Consume Product - Arete Network

devotech2 on scored.co

1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / )

No. Jews don't worship Yahweh and they haven't for a long time.

Yahweh is not Satan.

Ba'al is a *title*, ba'al was never a god. Ba'al in the OT usually refers to ba'al hadad and ba'al hamon. Ba'al means "lord". Ba'al became a colloquialism for the actual name, Ba'al Hammon/Hadad etc as time passed, but ba'al is not a deity. Much in the same way that God is not "Yahweh" in Europe but is Dios, Dieu, and Dio in Spanish, French, and Italian (which is a directly pagan derived name from Jupiter in and of itself, but nobody is saying that God is jupiter), some variant of "God/Gott/whatever" in germanic languages (unknown origin), Theos in Greek (from Zeus, pagan), and a variant of Bog in Slavic languages (unknown origin).

Yahweh is *THE* Ba'al. The same way he is the Lord, Adonai, God, Dio, Bog, or whatever other name you want to call Him. The Israelites *did* call Yahweh Ba'al... and? He is *THE* Ba'al. Technically, everyone in southern Europe is calling him Jupiter too.

Also, on another note, "El" isn't a God either. It's also a title with similar meaning to Ba'al, and one that was also given to Yahweh (Elohim). I know it wasn't mentioned but I figured I would bring it up.

There is also no etymological connection between Hovah meaning evil and Yahweh/Jehovah. HWH means "to be" in biblical Hebrew. *HVH* is what means "destruction", essentially. The entire word is transliterated wrong in most texts because historical Latin has "V" making a "W" sound and corresponding with the biblical Hebrew Waw. This doesn't work in English or indeed most languages except maybe German because V doesn't make this sound anymore even in romance languages, so it looks like a completely different consonant at the end. Hebrew also dropped waw and replaced it with vav when the language was recreated, which muddies it further. Quite possibly on purpose, because jews hate God.

Jehovah would be more accurately pronounced not with "hovah" but with "howah" , which is why I believe Yahweh is much more faithful than Jehovah as far as names go.

Pure Gnosticism is what this post is.

However, I do fully agree that the jews worship Satan. But they sure as *fuck* don't worship Yahweh.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

OstFronter on scored.co

1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / ) 2 children

This shit trying to separate Christians from the OT is jewish.

This is how it is. We are now Israel. All the stuff about slaughtering infidels, deceiving the unbeliever, training yourself for war, separating the races, taking slaves APPLIES TO US.

Shit like circumcision and not wearing 2 different fabric materials only applied to the ancient Israelites because they fucked around.

The modern jews PROBABLY are not the ancient Israelites. And even if they are, they reject God therefore the covenant is broken between them and He. CHRISTIANS INHERITED IT.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

SFAM1A on scored.co

1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

No, I agree completely with separating Christianity from the OT. I believe God is immutable, and the same God was around back then, but the kikes were twisting His Word to suit their agendas. And I'm not talking about ancillary things, but *core values*. The author of the Epistle of Barnabas argues that jews had the practice of circumcision, and everything else, wrong from the very *beginning*. I'm not saying things like slaughtering infidels, training yourself for war etc. are *bad* things and that they don't apply to Christians, but the jews who wrote the torah were 100% doing it of their own volition. Deuteronomy contains a step-by-step path for jewish world domination and subjugation that was entirely written by their hand. And then we have the book of esther, of course. You can also tell that the crap about taking slaves was written by a kike hand:

>The jewish people are the best of the human species, created to know their creator and worship him, and worthy of having slaves to serve them. And if they will not have slaves of other peoples, they would have to enslave their brothers. Therefore, we are commanded to possess those for our service

--some rabbi, quoted from Shahak's *jewish history*. And there's plenty more where that came from.

I agree wholeheartedly that Christians, particularly White Christians, are the inheritors of the New Covenant, and that God has wholly rejected the jews. But we can be that without having to embrace jewish "scriptures" like the OT. I'm not saying *everything* in there is bad, just most of it, and you have to *really* keep a sharp eye on it to separate out what is good and useful, and what is kike babbling.

>The modern jews PROBABLY are not the ancient Israelites

There's no *probably* about it; they are completely and entirely a different genetic entity, twisted by centuries of inbreeding and devil worship into a crude mockery of God's greatest creation. https://files.catbox.moe/ykfrf8.png. They have of course usurped the title specifically to fool gullible judeo-"christians" into supporting them.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

OstFronter on scored.co

1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child

God extended the Mosaic law to the Israelites because they continuously strayed. It was essentially a curse, all that is within it can be more or less forgotten, but there are certain implications within that have significance. You are correct that Duet provides step by step instructions to conquer the world. That is exactly what God wants us to do. The NT says the same thing: go and spread the Gospel to all nations of the world.

>some rabbi

Who gives a fuck what some sheckle hording pedo has to say about *anything,* especially in a book that does not pertain to him?

Every single race and species that has existed has taken slaves. Personally I think slavery is abominable and would rather that it would cease to exist.

>I'm not saying everything in there is bad, just most of it

Ok, let's take an example that gets passed around as "bad." Jacob deceiving Shechem. Oy VeY tHe JeWs aLlOw ThEmSeLvEs tO LiE!! The average churchgoer says there is absolutely no justification for lying, which I agree with in some cases, but the scripture tells us a different story. I'll summarize the story in case you're unfamiliar.

>Shechem defiled a daughter of Jacob, then asked Jacob for the girl to marry. Jacob said "yes, but it is our law that your entire people be circumcised in order to marry into our nation. Then our nations will exchange many women between each other." Shechem agreed and the entire town circumcised themselves. While they were recovering from their self inflicted wounds, the sons of Jacob fell on them and slaughtered them with the sword.

Here is the moral of the story, if your people is dishonored by strangers, then it is permissible to lie to them and kill them. Today we see the unwashed hordes of the heathens showing up on the shores of Europe raping our sisters. What is justified by scripture? While the churches preach tolerance, peace and continued migration, scripture gives us a different lesson.

Is it good to lie for convenience or self serving? NO. In no case. But only to provide for your people against one who would dishonor or destroy them.

Jesus tells us when anything is permissible by the faithful. When something is done in love for your people, to save them from demise or to protect them from dishonor, there is no sin in action as long as that action is taken in absolute faith toward God. All the commandments hang on one, love thy neighbor even as you love yourself. This is the purpose to everything in the OT and New.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

SFAM1A on scored.co

1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

>You are correct that Duet provides step by step instructions to conquer the world. That is exactly what God wants us to do.

I'm not saying God *doesn't* want us to do that. I'm just saying that the correct justification for this does not come from jewish "scriptures".

>Who gives a fuck what some sheckle hording pedo has to say about anything, especially in a book that does not pertain to him?

You retarded or something? It's not just *some rabbit*, ALL JEWS believe this. It is taught to all of them. They quite literally believe that every jew is God incarnate and the entire world exists to serve them. I have plenty of other quotes demonstrating this.

>Here is the moral of the story, if your people is dishonored by strangers, then it is permissible to lie to them and kill them.

How can you read genesis 34 and *not* see how it is a case study in absolute peak kike behavior? What's next, are you going to defend purim too? Now that I've started paying attention, I'm quite surprised at the amount of /ourguys/ who are otherwise quite opposed to the jews who still derive most of their worldview from *jewish scriptures*. If the NT, written by *actual Christians*, says the same things, why not just stick with that?

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

OstFronter on scored.co

1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child

>ALL JEWS believe this

And I care even less about how ALL JEWS interpret the OT that doesn't apply to them anyway. It's like atheists quoting out of context scripture at Christians. Who gives a fuck?

The OT justifies national behavior. When our people are pressed by an enemy, we are to react in any way. This is permissible by God. This is what is taught in the OT. This is not the theme in the NT and the hyper focus on the NT is one of the many reasons why Christianity is so fucked right now. The NT gives reason behind the OT, and that reason is love in one's brothers and faith in God, but the OT gives us scriptural justification in wrath and war against the infidel.

>What's next, are you going to defend purim too?

At no point have I defended jewish holidays, Mosaic law or traditions.

>If the NT, written by actual Christians, says the same things, why not just stick with that?

Because it doesn't say the same thing unless it is contextualized by the OT.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

SFAM1A on scored.co

1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child

>And I care even less about how ALL JEWS interpret the OT that doesn't apply to them anyway

Well you should, because that is going to determine how they act, how they behave, and what their attack methods against us are going to be. Ignore that, and you won't be anywhere *near* adequately prepared to counter them and fight back.

>It's like atheists quoting out of context scripture at Christians.

atheists aren't trying to exterminate us from the face of the earth.

>The OT justifies national behavior. When our people are pressed by an enemy, we are to react in any way. This is permissible by God.

I'm not saying it isn't. How many times must I repeat this? Just because the broken clock happened to be right twice a day doesn't mean it is to be trusted for the rest of the time.

>and the hyper focus on the NT is one of the many reasons why Christianity is so fucked right now.

Not true. There *is* no hyper focus on the NT right now, but I wish there was.

>but the OT gives us scriptural justification in wrath and war against the infidel.

You're just cherry picking the parts you like. The OT also says to mutilate the genitalia of infant boys. Should we keep doing that too?

>At no point have I defended jewish holidays, Mosaic law or traditions.

You're doing it now. The OT *is* the "mosaic law". What do you think leviticus and numbers are? Everything that came after that (the zohar, talmud, etc) was just a *further* bastardization and twisting of what the jews had already bastardized and twisted once.

>Because it doesn't say the same thing unless it is contextualized by the OT.

So *briefly contextualize* it, recognize that the rest of the OT is largely jewish nonsense, and move on.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

Continue thread...

ScallionPancake on scored.co

1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child

> not wearing 2 different fabric materials

???

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

MrBaptist on scored.co

1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

Leviticus 19:19 and Deuteronomy 22:9-11. The Israelites were to be a pure and unmixed people, and these restrictions on mixing were to symbolise this.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

PeterHann13 on scored.co

1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / )

Linen and Wool are very pure fabrics to be wearing. I don’t mean to sound gay, but the natural frequencies of the two fabrics are equal and opposite at 5000Hz; meaning if we mix them, their properties cancel out. That study was done by a Jew though, so take it as you will, but the study also found that fake plastic clothing materials are horrible for you and cotton sits around the same frequency as humans.

What you said is true though; in many ways our father is both metaphorical and literal in his words.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co