You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
OstFronter on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)
> Ignore that, and you won't be anywhere near adequately prepared to counter them and fight back.
I have been debating these kikes for the past 10 years. I know very well how they operate.
>atheists aren't trying to exterminate us from the face of the earth
They are.
>Just because the broken clock happened to be right twice a day doesn't mean it is to be trusted for the rest of the time.
It was right about everything. The coming of Christ, the destruction of the jewry, the breaking of the covenant, the nature of the jews.
>There is no hyper focus on the NT right now, but I wish there was
Go tell a modernist Christian that the bible calls homosexuality an abomination and see what the response is. "That's the OT, it's obsolete!"
>You're just cherry picking the parts you like. The OT also says to mutilate the genitalia of infant boys.
That is the Mosaic law. That is not the permissible law of nature. This is where you're hung up. The Mosaic law is finished. Jesus fulfilled it. Circumcision is nothing, and it always was nothing. The laws in Duet and Lev are meant ONLY for the ancient Israelites, period. The lessons we get from the saints is not at all connected to the mosaic law.
>The OT is the "mosaic law"
Wrong. The OT contains history and the prophets. Only a select few books are related at all to the law given by Moses.
>So briefly contextualize it, recognize that the rest of the OT is largely jewish nonsense, and move on.
If a man murders and innocent woman, what should come of him? Please use only the NT to justify your answer.
I have been debating these kikes for the past 10 years. I know very well how they operate.
>atheists aren't trying to exterminate us from the face of the earth
They are.
>Just because the broken clock happened to be right twice a day doesn't mean it is to be trusted for the rest of the time.
It was right about everything. The coming of Christ, the destruction of the jewry, the breaking of the covenant, the nature of the jews.
>There is no hyper focus on the NT right now, but I wish there was
Go tell a modernist Christian that the bible calls homosexuality an abomination and see what the response is. "That's the OT, it's obsolete!"
>You're just cherry picking the parts you like. The OT also says to mutilate the genitalia of infant boys.
That is the Mosaic law. That is not the permissible law of nature. This is where you're hung up. The Mosaic law is finished. Jesus fulfilled it. Circumcision is nothing, and it always was nothing. The laws in Duet and Lev are meant ONLY for the ancient Israelites, period. The lessons we get from the saints is not at all connected to the mosaic law.
>The OT is the "mosaic law"
Wrong. The OT contains history and the prophets. Only a select few books are related at all to the law given by Moses.
>So briefly contextualize it, recognize that the rest of the OT is largely jewish nonsense, and move on.
If a man murders and innocent woman, what should come of him? Please use only the NT to justify your answer.