Desegregation
(pbs.twimg.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Guns are a deterrent for both your own government *and* governments abroad from growing tyrannical over you.
While we're seeing our government going to shit, I'd argue it's slower than elsewhere. And, more importantly, I'd argue that it *will* eventually reach a point where those guns are used. Right now, they are taking careful steps in their tyranny to avoid this from being a possibility (which is why it is slower), but eventually it will boil over (which is why they are trying to take our guns away before then).
To say the 2nd amendment isn't working because the government has grown more tyrannical over about 100 years without enough pushback is premature. They've put a lot of systems in place to delay our reaction, but that does not mean our reaction is not coming. 100 years is a short amount of time, especially when it only recently got real bad.
And protecting us from foreign governments is obvious. A true, aggressive invasion into America will be incredibly unlikely, unless our government actively supports it (which we are seeing with "immigration," but that goes back to the point I just made about our own government).
That's already military action, which usually goes through governments anyway. Unless you want to go on nigger-hunting safaris.
> I'd argue it's slower than elsewhere
The US is spearheading all of the degeneracy. Germany is taking over English terms 1:1 like "gender" to push tranny ideology. The West is importing subhumans, but that's all based on the ideal the US provides.
> I'd argue that it will eventually reach a point where those guns are used
That is certain. Better sooner than later.
> Right now, they are taking careful steps in their tyranny to avoid this from being a possibility
[Here](https://files.catbox.moe/7vfmhd.jpg) is a quick drawing how I see it. The USA's increase in degeneracy was continual/linear, while the West skyrocketed to catch up and even surpass the US. And with or without guns, neither the US nor Europeans are putting up real resistance. It's not like without guns it's impossible, it's just harder.
And I am not advocating against guns. I am just saying that in countries without niggers that aren't nigger-importing jewish tyrannies you don't need guns. But it's only a matter of time until they take over. And when the jews take over Hungary, I might have to take action.
Yes, but the civilian population being armed is a tangible benefit here. If our government were actually on our side, for example, and a foreign nation invaded, we would have a massive stockpile of arms, already distributed.
>The US is spearheading all of the degeneracy
No, Israel is.
What White people lack is enough people with courage.
Lmao. No. Not having guns doesn't make you more effective against fighting back against the government. That is a completely ridiculous thing to say.
What is your logic there? I can make assumptions, but before I rebut, I'd like to make sure I fully understand your position.
Unarmed protests can paralize a country. Blocking key roads and railways would grind the economy to a halt, especially if it's done with trucks / heavy machinery.
When Trump had his election stolen for example, all the MAGAtards had to do was using tractors to block every major road (especially the ones around the centers of power). If done by enough people and motivated enough, the government will have to give up.
This kind of actions is almost always successful, both in America (see BLM) and in Europe.
Of course this relies on the country being mostly racially homogeneous (like in the OP). In Eastern European countries under the USSR this kind of actions failed because they brought in soldiers from Asia.
That's why ZOG tries to get niggers in the military and the police.
Look at J6. That was a protest of completely unarmed civilians. And look at what it got us.
The reality is that J6 *should* have been a group of armed protesters. Perhaps then it would not have been meaningless.
I'm not saying that we shouldn't have guns. In fact, we should try to get as many guns as possible because a violent confrontation seems inevitable.
The point I was making is that if the people were willing to rebel against the government, the means are there. We lack the numbers. For now.