Desegregation
(pbs.twimg.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Lmao. No. Not having guns doesn't make you more effective against fighting back against the government. That is a completely ridiculous thing to say.
What is your logic there? I can make assumptions, but before I rebut, I'd like to make sure I fully understand your position.
Unarmed protests can paralize a country. Blocking key roads and railways would grind the economy to a halt, especially if it's done with trucks / heavy machinery.
When Trump had his election stolen for example, all the MAGAtards had to do was using tractors to block every major road (especially the ones around the centers of power). If done by enough people and motivated enough, the government will have to give up.
This kind of actions is almost always successful, both in America (see BLM) and in Europe.
Of course this relies on the country being mostly racially homogeneous (like in the OP). In Eastern European countries under the USSR this kind of actions failed because they brought in soldiers from Asia.
That's why ZOG tries to get niggers in the military and the police.
Look at J6. That was a protest of completely unarmed civilians. And look at what it got us.
The reality is that J6 *should* have been a group of armed protesters. Perhaps then it would not have been meaningless.
I'm not saying that we shouldn't have guns. In fact, we should try to get as many guns as possible because a violent confrontation seems inevitable.
The point I was making is that if the people were willing to rebel against the government, the means are there. We lack the numbers. For now.