Desegregation
(pbs.twimg.com)
All leftism is satanism.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
27 comments:
u/BringTheCat789
Also see this. Guns have 2 primary purposes: To be able to fend off niggers and to fight your own government becoming tyrannical. The former is a problem mostly in the US, so walking around with guns in places where niggers are is reasonable, possibly necessary.
But even if the oh-so well armed people of the US do nothing against that, and instead go "muh' heckin' based conservative faggots, trannies, niggers" to defend them, what use do they really have? To protect and enforce jewish rule?
So either the US is too cucked to combat its abusive, exploitative, tyrannical governments, or it's generally not feasible. In that case the only purpose is guns as nigger-busters. If there are no niggers, it's not really needed.
Also see this. Guns have 2 primary purposes: To be able to fend off niggers and to fight your own government becoming tyrannical. The former is a problem mostly in the US, so walking around with guns in places where niggers are is reasonable, possibly necessary.
But even if the oh-so well armed people of the US do nothing against that, and instead go "muh' heckin' based conservative faggots, trannies, niggers" to defend them, what use do they really have? To protect and enforce jewish rule?
So either the US is too cucked to combat its abusive, exploitative, tyrannical governments, or it's generally not feasible. In that case the only purpose is guns as nigger-busters. If there are no niggers, it's not really needed.
I think we are seeing a few things.
Guns are a deterrent for both your own government *and* governments abroad from growing tyrannical over you.
While we're seeing our government going to shit, I'd argue it's slower than elsewhere. And, more importantly, I'd argue that it *will* eventually reach a point where those guns are used. Right now, they are taking careful steps in their tyranny to avoid this from being a possibility (which is why it is slower), but eventually it will boil over (which is why they are trying to take our guns away before then).
To say the 2nd amendment isn't working because the government has grown more tyrannical over about 100 years without enough pushback is premature. They've put a lot of systems in place to delay our reaction, but that does not mean our reaction is not coming. 100 years is a short amount of time, especially when it only recently got real bad.
And protecting us from foreign governments is obvious. A true, aggressive invasion into America will be incredibly unlikely, unless our government actively supports it (which we are seeing with "immigration," but that goes back to the point I just made about our own government).
Guns are a deterrent for both your own government *and* governments abroad from growing tyrannical over you.
While we're seeing our government going to shit, I'd argue it's slower than elsewhere. And, more importantly, I'd argue that it *will* eventually reach a point where those guns are used. Right now, they are taking careful steps in their tyranny to avoid this from being a possibility (which is why it is slower), but eventually it will boil over (which is why they are trying to take our guns away before then).
To say the 2nd amendment isn't working because the government has grown more tyrannical over about 100 years without enough pushback is premature. They've put a lot of systems in place to delay our reaction, but that does not mean our reaction is not coming. 100 years is a short amount of time, especially when it only recently got real bad.
And protecting us from foreign governments is obvious. A true, aggressive invasion into America will be incredibly unlikely, unless our government actively supports it (which we are seeing with "immigration," but that goes back to the point I just made about our own government).
> and governments abroad from growing tyrannical over you.
That's already military action, which usually goes through governments anyway. Unless you want to go on nigger-hunting safaris.
> I'd argue it's slower than elsewhere
The US is spearheading all of the degeneracy. Germany is taking over English terms 1:1 like "gender" to push tranny ideology. The West is importing subhumans, but that's all based on the ideal the US provides.
> I'd argue that it will eventually reach a point where those guns are used
That is certain. Better sooner than later.
> Right now, they are taking careful steps in their tyranny to avoid this from being a possibility
[Here](https://files.catbox.moe/7vfmhd.jpg) is a quick drawing how I see it. The USA's increase in degeneracy was continual/linear, while the West skyrocketed to catch up and even surpass the US. And with or without guns, neither the US nor Europeans are putting up real resistance. It's not like without guns it's impossible, it's just harder.
And I am not advocating against guns. I am just saying that in countries without niggers that aren't nigger-importing jewish tyrannies you don't need guns. But it's only a matter of time until they take over. And when the jews take over Hungary, I might have to take action.
That's already military action, which usually goes through governments anyway. Unless you want to go on nigger-hunting safaris.
> I'd argue it's slower than elsewhere
The US is spearheading all of the degeneracy. Germany is taking over English terms 1:1 like "gender" to push tranny ideology. The West is importing subhumans, but that's all based on the ideal the US provides.
> I'd argue that it will eventually reach a point where those guns are used
That is certain. Better sooner than later.
> Right now, they are taking careful steps in their tyranny to avoid this from being a possibility
[Here](https://files.catbox.moe/7vfmhd.jpg) is a quick drawing how I see it. The USA's increase in degeneracy was continual/linear, while the West skyrocketed to catch up and even surpass the US. And with or without guns, neither the US nor Europeans are putting up real resistance. It's not like without guns it's impossible, it's just harder.
And I am not advocating against guns. I am just saying that in countries without niggers that aren't nigger-importing jewish tyrannies you don't need guns. But it's only a matter of time until they take over. And when the jews take over Hungary, I might have to take action.
>That's already military action, which usually goes through governments anyway.
Yes, but the civilian population being armed is a tangible benefit here. If our government were actually on our side, for example, and a foreign nation invaded, we would have a massive stockpile of arms, already distributed.
>The US is spearheading all of the degeneracy
No, Israel is.
Yes, but the civilian population being armed is a tangible benefit here. If our government were actually on our side, for example, and a foreign nation invaded, we would have a massive stockpile of arms, already distributed.
>The US is spearheading all of the degeneracy
No, Israel is.
People could fight back against their government even without guns, and probably would be even more effective without guns.
What White people lack is enough people with courage.
What White people lack is enough people with courage.
>probably would be even more effective without guns.
Lmao. No. Not having guns doesn't make you more effective against fighting back against the government. That is a completely ridiculous thing to say.
What is your logic there? I can make assumptions, but before I rebut, I'd like to make sure I fully understand your position.
Lmao. No. Not having guns doesn't make you more effective against fighting back against the government. That is a completely ridiculous thing to say.
What is your logic there? I can make assumptions, but before I rebut, I'd like to make sure I fully understand your position.
When people protest without weapons, the government cannot just shoot them. That's because the vast majority of the armed forces and the police would not open fire against unarmed civilians.
Unarmed protests can paralize a country. Blocking key roads and railways would grind the economy to a halt, especially if it's done with trucks / heavy machinery.
When Trump had his election stolen for example, all the MAGAtards had to do was using tractors to block every major road (especially the ones around the centers of power). If done by enough people and motivated enough, the government will have to give up.
This kind of actions is almost always successful, both in America (see BLM) and in Europe.
Of course this relies on the country being mostly racially homogeneous (like in the OP). In Eastern European countries under the USSR this kind of actions failed because they brought in soldiers from Asia.
That's why ZOG tries to get niggers in the military and the police.
Unarmed protests can paralize a country. Blocking key roads and railways would grind the economy to a halt, especially if it's done with trucks / heavy machinery.
When Trump had his election stolen for example, all the MAGAtards had to do was using tractors to block every major road (especially the ones around the centers of power). If done by enough people and motivated enough, the government will have to give up.
This kind of actions is almost always successful, both in America (see BLM) and in Europe.
Of course this relies on the country being mostly racially homogeneous (like in the OP). In Eastern European countries under the USSR this kind of actions failed because they brought in soldiers from Asia.
That's why ZOG tries to get niggers in the military and the police.
Toast message
What a shame.
FDR (the communist) turned the federal government into an oppositional force against the American people. The ww2 generation really fucked us, way more than the boomers.