New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
55
Who they’re after (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by MLJFireDragon747 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +55Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
26 comments:
14
detransthrowaway on scored.co
1 year ago 14 points (+0 / -0 / +14Score on mirror ) 1 child
If anyone's wondering as to the outcome of the first story, after talking to a judge the fine was reduced to $500, which at least isn't life-ending.
17
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 17 points (+0 / -0 / +17Score on mirror ) 3 children
Still weird tho how people get punished for the crime of theft, even though they wasn't even aware it was theft, when they meant no harm, and when they returned the stolen clams. But shoplifters, oh they know theft is illegal, they have intent and they don't return the stolen merchandise. Yet they walk free.
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
They were a family of beaners (how did any of you dolts miss that one) who were poaching. You can't "accidentally" dig up seventy-two fucking clams. Nobody goes to a beach vacation and takes seventy-two live mollusks home as a "souvenir" either. I could believe four or five. Seventy-two was an intentional operation.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
> You can't "accidentally" dig up seventy-two fucking clams.

That wasn't the claim, you don't dig them up by accident. It's all on purpose, because you didn't know it was illegal to do so. Beaners you say, then that explains it, maybe it's not illegal in Mexico? And this further proves why illegal immigration must be stopped.
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
>That wasn't the claim, you don't dig them up by accident

It really was, she specifically claimed they didn't even know what clams were.

https://nypost.com/2024/05/23/us-news/california-mom-fined-88k-after-kids-collect-72-clams-from-pismo-beach-thinking-they-were-seashells/

>“They know now at the beach don’t touch anything, ***but they know now what a clam is***, compared to what a seashell is now, I’ve had to explain that to them,” she said.

Clams are 6-8" deep in the part of the beach that's always wet, so you don't just stumble across them building a sand castle or burying someone in the sand.

Clams are found looking for the little telltale spout of water out of the sand, they aren't just lying around in the open, so if you're looking for seashells why would you go digging in six inches of wet sand for them exactly where a clam is? That's seventy-two holes they dug. Unless they excavated the entire beach then they knew right where to dig and that means they knew what they were looking for.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
So you're telling me there's actual proof of malicious intent for once? That's great, go ahead and punish them for their crime.
covok48 on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 2 children
It’s to protect the integrity of the park / beach.

For example what if every one of Yellowstone’s 4 million visitors a year took a souvenir?
RoulerBleu on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
Then we rename the place OutOfStones.
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
Case in point, she was poaching (this was no accident) Pismo clams, which were harvest nearly to extinction a few decades ago, back when California's coastal cities were still relatively 'normal' sized. The 50s/60s saw the huge explosion in growth (look up pictures of San Diego from then it's crazy). The explosion in population met the popularity of Pismo clam digging, so all these faggots ran out to the beach to scoop up everything they found.

Pismo clams grow pretty slow, the 4" standard takes about a decade of growth to achieve, so of course with the typical shortsightedness in people they just assumed the clams were infinite and killed everything.
xxxxxxxxxxxx on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
I figured that was probably part of this story. She probably owns a souvenir shop or something and knows better. I was at Pawleys Island (SC) several years ago and my family were the only ones on the beach until this lady pulls up in a van with her 3 kids and they immediately go to work picking up every starfish on the beach, putting them into 5 gallon buckets and then laying them out on a blanket to dry them out. They did one round of that before I told her to stop and had to threaten to call the cops. People are pieces of shit.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
I'm aware of such laws, just disagreeing with the methods. If you don't tell anyone why they shouldn't pick up the clams and then fine them you're not doing anything to protect the clams, these things can get ruined even if returned. They have no interest in protecting the clams, they just milking money from unaware people.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 2 children
It's not theft, it's that to protect the environment we need laws to prevent random assholes from taking native species from their environment.
Albeit accidental, the girl's crime is worse.
systemthrowaway on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Well depends how you look at it. Groceries at goymart are resources taken from the Earth as well, just less limited. I'm willing to bet one nigger does more environmental damage than this lady. Not that I'm advocating for harvesting your own wild clams either.
deleted 1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 2 children
Clams don't live on rocks you utterly low-IQ shitwit fucking retard nigger-lover, they *burrow*. If they're picking them off of rocks, they're picking *mussels*. You don't even know this crucial difference between two wildly different types of animals, but you think you're qualified to somehow talk about conservation?

>of course you would rather have big corporations profit from this than ordinary people

"Big corporations" aren't harvesting mollusks off of beaches either, you dumb asshole. They farm them themselves, which is a far less jewish effort than trying to scoop up free shit to sell for profit.

>new clams appear on a daily basis pretty much

It literally takes ten years for a Pismo clam to grow to a nice plump 4" in size, with lots of meat.

>mexicans

You know what else I've *personally* seen Mexicans do to their coasts? Have tour companies and advertising showing beautiful reefs off the coast of some small town, which brings in tourists with money, who then go scuba diving and see nothing but a dead brown pile of rocks, because all the local taconiggers are *literally* breaking off what live coral remains with hatchets so they can sell it to you as a souvenir. Their tiny little nigger-brains cannot comprehend that once the word is out that they killed their reef, the tourists stop coming altogether. All they care about is their shekels *now* so they can buy more beer *now*.

I know without asking you're one of those dumb trashy rednecks who thinks Jesus magically supplies infinite deer in the forests for your personal use and WE DAWN NEED NAW REG-YOO-LAY-SHUNZ.

Hey where'd the Passenger Pigeon go? Is Jesus going to repopulate that after your fuckignorant kind killed all of them? Is that before or after he restores all those reefs I mentioned?

Fuck off back to your MAGA ghetto, lolbert.
xxxxxxxxxxxx on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
I usually disagree on about 80% of the stances you take but this is one that I firmly stand with you on. The fucking island monkeys that break off pieces of the reef should have their hands cut off. I'd volunteer to hide in an underwater cave and strangle them to death when they dive down to steal resources and kill the reef. Hunters that go out every season of every species and kill off all the wildlife in an area should be hunted themselves. We get a lot of hunters in my rural area. They have no ties to the area. They shot and killed my neighbor's (extremely friendly, almost golden retriever tempered) dog. They throw McDonald's trash onto the dirt road. But by golly, they paid the big ranch next door their guide fee so they are entitled to come out and trash up the place and kill anything that moves. We need to wall off the cities and napalm them.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
This is the best comment I read all week.
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 2 children
The clam story was a bunch of beaners poaching. The entire thing is a lie. Anyone who's ever dug for clams knows that. They should've all been put in prison and then deported.

You can't "accidentally" pick up clams. Pismo clams burrow 6" deep in the sand. When's the last time you just casually dug 6" deep into the sand at the beach that's right in the surf? That isn't 'making a sand castle' territory.

Unless you are intentionally looking for clams you'd pass them right by. So these greasy taconiggers didn't just "happen" across them.

Nobody "collects" seventy-two seashells for souvenirs either. And if anyone would do that, that's 100% classic beaner behavior - scoop up and steal everything 'free' without regard for anyone else. That's the "take one piece" open Halloween candy bowl that every beaner family dumps for themselves and leaves.

I could believe it if they grabbed two or three.

Seventy-two is an operation.

https://nypost.com/2024/05/23/us-news/california-mom-fined-88k-after-kids-collect-72-clams-from-pismo-beach-thinking-they-were-seashells/

Pictures of this fat mongrelized spic whore, her big wide nigger nose, and her spiclings are here.

They claim they didn't know what clams were. Why would they have thought to dig them up then? Even if you just stumbled across one with your feet in the sand, without knowing what a clam was, you'd think it was just a rock and pay it no mind.
Xachariah on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Yep. Doesn't even have a happy ending.

The police caught her for poaching and rightly fined her to ruin. Then at court they noticed she was a spic instead of a white so they let her go free with a slap on the wrist.
deleted 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
The clam story is just similar to that disgusting wetback who killed a bunch of people ramming his truck into them in Colorado and then got nearly everything dropped by the governor on account of being a wetback because the 'news' falsely carried his bullshit fake victim story.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/12/30/colorado-rogel-aguilera-mederos-110-year-sentence/9059174002/
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Toast message