New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
71
posted 1 year ago by CrusaderPepe on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +71Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
CrusaderPepe on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I've heard of it. It's just not consistent with Christianity.
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
It's consistent with Scripture, history and archaeology, just not the "church fathers" and rabbis.

What way in particular do you think it conflicts with Scripture?
CrusaderPepe on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The fact that it's NOT consistent with the Church Fathers is a HUGE problem. Being Christian means we are supposed to receive the Faith as it was understood by the Christians before us. If we allow the Faith to be changed somewhere along the way that contradicts what Christians before us believed, then that is obviously a problem. It means that a "new Faith" was essentially created.
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Why should we care how others before us perceived it if it conflicts with Scripture? We're under the curse of disobedience in Deuteronomy, so of course our understanding is going to be clouded and change as the veil is lifted. Dual seedline is the understanding that comes as a result.
CrusaderPepe on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
If you don't "hold firm to tradition" as St. Paul tells us, then this means you have fallen to prey to "false prophets" and are off the mark of Christian orthodoxy.
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
I'd suggest you keep reading past one phrase.

"Therefore, brethren, stand fast and hold to the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word or our epistle."

Word, as in the Scriptures, not the imagination of some church father, rather than the words of Christ.
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Well, any remark to this passage?
Toast message