1 on 1 Discussion (Please all others stay out)
(scored.co)
The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day. Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck. I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying.
Gradually I began to hate them.
Gradually I began to hate them.
1. Are the Jews cursed, and enemies of God and the human race even up to the present? I say yes. Swamp Jew says no.
2. Is the Old Covenant still ongoing? I say no. Swamp Jew says yes.
3. Is OSAS true? I say no. Swamp Jew says yes.
4. Is the "Hebrew-roots Christian" movement actually Christian? I say no. Swamp Jew says yes.
5. Is the Talmud anti-Christian? I say yes. Swamp Jew says no.
They are not good people, they are slippery serpents who will use every trick in the book to "win" the argument
Hence "the more i debated them, the more i grew to hate them" quote
I agree with others here, though, that having a good debate (civil, honest, logical, and prioritizing truth) with jews and jew defenders is impossible. However, I will add that it doesn't necessarily mean we shouldn't do it. Attempting to have a good debate with someone who is incapable of it helps in several ways. It reveals the bad character and false ideas of the person we're debating. It illuminates the truth and teaches the people who are observing. It gives resistance to evil. It allows us to hone our own arguments and thoughts through challenge. Weak men and weak ideas are never challenged. Strong men with strong ideas seek out to be challenged. And, if we're being honest, debate gives us the opportunity to see if our ideas, in part or whole, are false, so we can move forward in truth.
You seem to think that jews can become Christians, but no non-White can be a Christian. While jews are Esau's children, who was White, he was a race mixer and has no pure offspring. That's why Jacob rightfully took the birthright.
Why were there Edomites, who we now know as jews today, in Judea during Christ's time? Josephus book 13 tells us. Idumea is an Edomite land. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/ant-13.html#:~:text=it%20was%20built.-,35,-Hyrcanus%20took%20also
The first video is an example. The parable of the wheat and the tares a little below it is good too: https://media.christogenea.org/video-categories/christogenea-outtakes
What way in particular do you think it conflicts with Scripture?
Pretty telling.