You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
15
PermaHandshake on scored.co
1 year ago15 points(+0/-0/+15Score on mirror)3 children
It's a shame because MGTOW and ConPro actually have a lot of overlap. The ConPro people that can't see it are blind and the MGTOW people that can't see it are equally as blind. ConPro without the gynocratic lens that MGTOW has is missing a lot. It is estimated that roughly 85% of consumption in society is driven by women. In order to understand why our society is such a joke, one needs to understand women because the female influence on society is a large part of it. The worst thing the jew ever did to White people was empower White women and oppress White men. One could argue, that was the only truly damaging thing they've accomplished but it's all that's needed to bring down society. MGTOW without realizing the jews are the ones who empowered the women and are the ones preventing men from taking that power away are just blind leading the blind.
1 year ago14 points(+0/-0/+14Score on mirror)1 child
It's not equal blindness at all. We are concerned with digging up the roots of the (((problems))) in the world, they are swatting at branches like any other sperg that gets hyperfocused on one aspect of modern degeneracy because that was the one that affected them personally.
The way women and true femininity has been so corrupted is one of the foremost problems we face to be sure, but so is the epidemic of chicken shit numales that don't want to confront the fact that most of them flat out don't deserve the things they think they are being deprived of. I cannot abide the mewling little cunts that comprise most of those kinds of forums. And to break it down to the simplest possible level: we need our women. Or our race goes extinct. Period.
1 year ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)1 child
The MGTOW guys refuse to see jewish influence for sure. One could argue WW1 started from the overall societal collapse brought about by feminism and other modernist enlightenment projects. Half of that is weakness on our part and jews taking advantage and fostering weakness.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)4 children
Just because you see MGTOW as the opposite of feminists doesn't mean it's the wrong position. Hypothetically, women who maintain feminist views could be wrong on all their views while men who maintain the same views but flipped around could be right on all their views. It doesn't have to follow that because feminists are wrong about their worldview that MGTOW is wrong about theirs. Much of the feminist's viewpoint revolves around men having all the power in society and oppressing them but is that true? MGTOW men suggest the relationship is reversed and arguably, it is, so MGTOW might have the correct position being "male feminists" while actual feminists are wrong.
It's a discussion worth having anyhow. ConPro's solution is often to become simps or slaves which isn't really a good solution either.
1 year ago10 points(+0/-0/+10Score on mirror)1 child
I have NEVER seen a simping conpro user. I have NEVER seen some shit tier cucking in this forum. I have only ever seen people raising each other up through pointing out degeneracy and idolatry. "Stop cooming bro she's not an object" "fund a good wife and honor her as a wife should be, as she honors you and serves her purpose as a mother." Etc. That isn't simping or cucking it is how a man should be. Honestly the expectations of mtgow and conpro and the difficult and unrealistic expectations they give to most young men makes it damn near impossible for any of them to find a good relationship and causes the anger and resentment most see in these communities. The young don't know how to caveat those expectations with balance and reality. If anything that should be the doscussion.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
Just to be cleaar, MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) is not the opposite of feminism. If you want that, that's MRA (Men's Rights Activists). MGTOW literally means what it means, individual men going their own way, it's not a movement. The MGTOW here on this forum is not even MGTOW. The OG MGTOWs are at the absolute minimum 40 years old and most of the people in the forum are in their 20s or younger.
You got it, and because MGTOW is not a movement, you're not going to get a group of people to come here and argue that. I'm still a member of an old phpBB forum where these guys hang out, even if I told everyone the name of the forum and unless people Googled it in a very specific way, they would not find it and even if they did, registration is not open to new people because that's what MGTOW people do. They generally do their own thing quietly and stay under the radar.
Those people are mostly early retired now, travelling and buying $5000+ synthesizers (there's a guy there into music gear), another 60+ year old dude just bought a new Corvette and is taking a road trip across North America. Two other dudes are going to Thailand. They have no time to dick around on a forum with 20 year olds.
Some MGTOW men act like opposite of feminism. Not all MGTOW men are 40yo. The original MGTOW guy who created the movement is and he also went back to the plantation after giving up MGTOW. MGTOW is just a natural adaptation to overpriced women. The higher price women become the more MGTOW men there will be. As with any product or service, the higher you price it the less buyers you get.
>Some MGTOW men act like opposite of feminism. Not all MGTOW men are 40yo.
If you're talking about the OG MGTOW, then yes, there are a few in their mid/late 30's but for the most part, they are well over 40.
>The original MGTOW guy who created the movement is and he also went back to the plantation after giving up MGTOW.
I know exactly who you are talking about, the guy who founded the now-defunct website The Spearhead (Bill P). MGTOW was around way before he started his website, so no, he is not the original MGTOW guy. The term MGTOW was already in use for quite a few years by the time The Spearhead started. The original MGTOW guy was the guy who wrote the original dontmarry.com essay, long before the term even existed. No one knows who he is.
>MGTOW men suggest the relationship is reversed and arguably, it is
But they're doing the same thing that feminists do. "I'm a strong independent [wahmen/man] and I don't need no [man/wahmen]." So if feminists are wrong for doing that, then so is the male equivalent for doing the same. Women are the way they are and they have been for all time, and its always been man's burden to have to deal with that. Yes its much worse now, but its still our burden to have to deal with. Less White babies is not going to solve anything.
>ConPro's solution is often to become simps or slaves
Couldn't be more wrong. ConPro's solution has *always* been to grow up, become a strong man, find the right woman (a good or at least decent one), and *lead*. I'll admit, that third step is the hardest part, but that doesn't mean the solution is to give up and not even try. MGTOWs are entirely incorrigible on the topic of becoming a strong man though, so they can only equate things into terms of simps or slaves. Its patently obvious to anyone on the outside looking in that the more MGTOW a man is, the weaker he is as well. We see the same thing in the female equivalent as well, so its not a coincidence.
Your conception of be a "strong man" is merely "accepting overpriced women". That's slavish. That's like walking into a car dealership, seeing a Ford Focus priced at $200k and then the salesman tries to humiliate you into buying the Ford Focus for $200k by saying you're not a real man if you don't buy the Ford Focus. Be a real man and pay $200k for a Ford Focus! That's manipulative and not in good faith. Men who are walking away from women are not weak men. They are in fact the strong men. The men who are manipulated into paying $200k for a Ford Focus are in fact the weak men because they're overpaying for something simply because they've been told that is what they ought to do. A strong man evaluates what a fair price is for the vehicle and pays that price. If no one will sell him a vehicle at a fair price he walks away. That is what strong men do. Desperate weak men overpay no matter what.
Women are overpriced in today's society from a man's perspective. That's why men are correct in acting the opposite of feminists because that is a correct proposition. Feminists who think men are overpriced are outright wrong so their perception of reality is not correct unlike the man's perspective. If you walk into a car dealership and the Ford Focus is selling for $200k and you as a man believe it's overpriced but the car salesman who is a woman believes it's selling at a fair price does that mean both people's view is equal? A feminist and a male feminist are not equal in credibility simply because they are both thinking the same thing but opposite. The man is correct in his evaluation of price while the woman is incorrect so only the man is correct in having his beliefs not the woman.
More low quality White babies won't help anything either. Low quality White babies end up gay, lesbian, trans, police officers who oppress quality Whites and military grunts that kill quality Whites at the behest of jews. Low quality Whites are your Shabbos Goys. We don't need anymore low quality Whites either. We're better off with less low quality Whites rather than more low quality Whites. What we need is high quality Whites and that can only happen with a high quality woman. Most women are not high quality women so when MGTOW men walk away from low quality women they are doing more to help White people than the weak men who procreate with low quality White women simply for the sake of procreating this creating a new army of Shabbos Goys for the jews to use to leach resources off of and fight against and oppress high quality Whites.
Women have always been the same. All that has changed is that we lack the power to force women into being what they ought to be. That means it's even more important now to pick quality women but given how few there are out there it makes sense that most men won't procreate or have a relationship with a woman and that's a good thing. We don't want the low quality Whites to reproduce but every weak men who keeps reproducing with these low quality White women is creating another soldier being used by jews to harm the White race.
>Your conception of be a "strong man" is merely "accepting overpriced women".
See, this is what I mean by MGTOWs being incorrigible on the topic of bettering themselves and becoming stronger men. They are not willing to concede one *inch* and agree to even one iota of the current problem resting on their shoulders. I'll use your analogy. You want to go to the Ford dealership to buy the newest, latest and greatest, and biggest F150 that money can buy, with all the bells and whistles included. You want something *perfect*. Predictably, its ludicrously expensive and you don't want to pay that much. So you're complaining, complaining, and all that; meanwhile there's a 2010 XLT F150 at the back of the lot for a fraction of the price that you're completely ignoring. Came from a good home, used well and taken care of, but it doesn't have all the bells, whistles, and *modernity* involved. You refuse to look for the good women because all the ones *you* have seen have been bad. And even if you did, you still want the things that make them bad in the first place. You have been looking in the modernized, secularized worldly scene and you have (predictably) not found anything good. In other words, you've been fishing in a cesspool and all you've found is crap, so your (and all MGTOWs) solution is to take the coward's way out and just give up.
>More low quality White babies won't help anything either.
yeah I'm not telling you to just shack up with some trashy skank just for the sake of more White babies. I'm telling you to get your head out of your rear end and go out there and find one of the good ones. And if you really well and truly can't find one (I will concede that there is indeed a nonzero chance of this), then there are much more productive things you can do with the rest of your life than whining about it on the internet. One of the patron saints of the MGTOW movement was thinking in the right direction...
>Most women are not high quality women so when MGTOW men walk away from low quality women they are doing more to help White people than the weak men who procreate with low quality White women
No, not really. Because you (well, maybe not *you*, specifically) are now a constant demoralization beacon, trying to drag the rest of us down with you. Men who might be somewhere in the middle, if they were to listen to your propaganda and be influenced by your worldview, may be enticed into giving up or otherwise quitting when if they had just persevered a while longer, may have found what they were looking for. I don't have a problem with *you* and the other hardcore MGTOW types giving up, because generally they are staunchly weak men and there is probably no rehabilitating that. Or if they were already screwed over by a woman, in like a divorce or something. I don't have a problem with the weak men getting out of our way, because otherwise they're an obstacle to the strong men. What I do have a problem with is them trying to influence the youth or men much younger than them who *haven't* had it bad like that into not even trying in the first place.
>but given how few there are out there it makes sense that most men won't procreate or have a relationship with a woman and that's a good thing.
That's why sometimes you may have to compromise and try to take one out of the enemy camp, even though it might be more difficult. I've heard stories and known of *strong* men IRL who have taken completely indoctrinated liberal feminist types and turned them into le conservative tradwife. The kicker with women is that if they are (relatively) easily manipulated into an ideology, sometimes they can be (relatively) easily manipulated out of it. Strong men can do this, weak men cannot. Hence why MGTOWs fail, because they are not strong.
Bottom line, I'm not refuting your or MGTOWs positions on modern women, feminism, the feminization of society, etc. What I'm merely refuting are your solutions. The critical root of the problem is that they have taken God out of the equation. And it is no wonder that things have not been going well for them as a result. Ever seen a religious MGTOWer? I sure haven't.
The way women and true femininity has been so corrupted is one of the foremost problems we face to be sure, but so is the epidemic of chicken shit numales that don't want to confront the fact that most of them flat out don't deserve the things they think they are being deprived of. I cannot abide the mewling little cunts that comprise most of those kinds of forums. And to break it down to the simplest possible level: we need our women. Or our race goes extinct. Period.
The sad part is they would be right if they worked on themselves and became men of value and understood what that meant.
It's a discussion worth having anyhow. ConPro's solution is often to become simps or slaves which isn't really a good solution either.
They consider this simping. They consider anything short of endless women hatred and virulent anti-natalism to be simping.
That is blatantly false.
Those people are mostly early retired now, travelling and buying $5000+ synthesizers (there's a guy there into music gear), another 60+ year old dude just bought a new Corvette and is taking a road trip across North America. Two other dudes are going to Thailand. They have no time to dick around on a forum with 20 year olds.
If you're talking about the OG MGTOW, then yes, there are a few in their mid/late 30's but for the most part, they are well over 40.
>The original MGTOW guy who created the movement is and he also went back to the plantation after giving up MGTOW.
I know exactly who you are talking about, the guy who founded the now-defunct website The Spearhead (Bill P). MGTOW was around way before he started his website, so no, he is not the original MGTOW guy. The term MGTOW was already in use for quite a few years by the time The Spearhead started. The original MGTOW guy was the guy who wrote the original dontmarry.com essay, long before the term even existed. No one knows who he is.
But they're doing the same thing that feminists do. "I'm a strong independent [wahmen/man] and I don't need no [man/wahmen]." So if feminists are wrong for doing that, then so is the male equivalent for doing the same. Women are the way they are and they have been for all time, and its always been man's burden to have to deal with that. Yes its much worse now, but its still our burden to have to deal with. Less White babies is not going to solve anything.
>ConPro's solution is often to become simps or slaves
Couldn't be more wrong. ConPro's solution has *always* been to grow up, become a strong man, find the right woman (a good or at least decent one), and *lead*. I'll admit, that third step is the hardest part, but that doesn't mean the solution is to give up and not even try. MGTOWs are entirely incorrigible on the topic of becoming a strong man though, so they can only equate things into terms of simps or slaves. Its patently obvious to anyone on the outside looking in that the more MGTOW a man is, the weaker he is as well. We see the same thing in the female equivalent as well, so its not a coincidence.
Women are overpriced in today's society from a man's perspective. That's why men are correct in acting the opposite of feminists because that is a correct proposition. Feminists who think men are overpriced are outright wrong so their perception of reality is not correct unlike the man's perspective. If you walk into a car dealership and the Ford Focus is selling for $200k and you as a man believe it's overpriced but the car salesman who is a woman believes it's selling at a fair price does that mean both people's view is equal? A feminist and a male feminist are not equal in credibility simply because they are both thinking the same thing but opposite. The man is correct in his evaluation of price while the woman is incorrect so only the man is correct in having his beliefs not the woman.
More low quality White babies won't help anything either. Low quality White babies end up gay, lesbian, trans, police officers who oppress quality Whites and military grunts that kill quality Whites at the behest of jews. Low quality Whites are your Shabbos Goys. We don't need anymore low quality Whites either. We're better off with less low quality Whites rather than more low quality Whites. What we need is high quality Whites and that can only happen with a high quality woman. Most women are not high quality women so when MGTOW men walk away from low quality women they are doing more to help White people than the weak men who procreate with low quality White women simply for the sake of procreating this creating a new army of Shabbos Goys for the jews to use to leach resources off of and fight against and oppress high quality Whites.
Women have always been the same. All that has changed is that we lack the power to force women into being what they ought to be. That means it's even more important now to pick quality women but given how few there are out there it makes sense that most men won't procreate or have a relationship with a woman and that's a good thing. We don't want the low quality Whites to reproduce but every weak men who keeps reproducing with these low quality White women is creating another soldier being used by jews to harm the White race.
See, this is what I mean by MGTOWs being incorrigible on the topic of bettering themselves and becoming stronger men. They are not willing to concede one *inch* and agree to even one iota of the current problem resting on their shoulders. I'll use your analogy. You want to go to the Ford dealership to buy the newest, latest and greatest, and biggest F150 that money can buy, with all the bells and whistles included. You want something *perfect*. Predictably, its ludicrously expensive and you don't want to pay that much. So you're complaining, complaining, and all that; meanwhile there's a 2010 XLT F150 at the back of the lot for a fraction of the price that you're completely ignoring. Came from a good home, used well and taken care of, but it doesn't have all the bells, whistles, and *modernity* involved. You refuse to look for the good women because all the ones *you* have seen have been bad. And even if you did, you still want the things that make them bad in the first place. You have been looking in the modernized, secularized worldly scene and you have (predictably) not found anything good. In other words, you've been fishing in a cesspool and all you've found is crap, so your (and all MGTOWs) solution is to take the coward's way out and just give up.
>More low quality White babies won't help anything either.
yeah I'm not telling you to just shack up with some trashy skank just for the sake of more White babies. I'm telling you to get your head out of your rear end and go out there and find one of the good ones. And if you really well and truly can't find one (I will concede that there is indeed a nonzero chance of this), then there are much more productive things you can do with the rest of your life than whining about it on the internet. One of the patron saints of the MGTOW movement was thinking in the right direction...
>Most women are not high quality women so when MGTOW men walk away from low quality women they are doing more to help White people than the weak men who procreate with low quality White women
No, not really. Because you (well, maybe not *you*, specifically) are now a constant demoralization beacon, trying to drag the rest of us down with you. Men who might be somewhere in the middle, if they were to listen to your propaganda and be influenced by your worldview, may be enticed into giving up or otherwise quitting when if they had just persevered a while longer, may have found what they were looking for. I don't have a problem with *you* and the other hardcore MGTOW types giving up, because generally they are staunchly weak men and there is probably no rehabilitating that. Or if they were already screwed over by a woman, in like a divorce or something. I don't have a problem with the weak men getting out of our way, because otherwise they're an obstacle to the strong men. What I do have a problem with is them trying to influence the youth or men much younger than them who *haven't* had it bad like that into not even trying in the first place.
>but given how few there are out there it makes sense that most men won't procreate or have a relationship with a woman and that's a good thing.
That's why sometimes you may have to compromise and try to take one out of the enemy camp, even though it might be more difficult. I've heard stories and known of *strong* men IRL who have taken completely indoctrinated liberal feminist types and turned them into le conservative tradwife. The kicker with women is that if they are (relatively) easily manipulated into an ideology, sometimes they can be (relatively) easily manipulated out of it. Strong men can do this, weak men cannot. Hence why MGTOWs fail, because they are not strong.
Bottom line, I'm not refuting your or MGTOWs positions on modern women, feminism, the feminization of society, etc. What I'm merely refuting are your solutions. The critical root of the problem is that they have taken God out of the equation. And it is no wonder that things have not been going well for them as a result. Ever seen a religious MGTOWer? I sure haven't.