New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
17
On the denial of the achievements of national socialism and perceived double standards
posted 1 year ago by Delon on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +17Score on mirror )
21 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
This is something i was pondering as a young lad, back when i still believed in history books. Why are Hitler's achievements never ever mentioned? The man took the absolute wretch of a dying nation that was the weimar republic into the most mighty single nation in all of europe, within a few short years.

Now on the topic of genocides, let's say, for the sake of argument, that the nazis did indeed murder 60 trillion chosen people in da shoah. We of course know better, but bear with me. Communism, as an ideology, killed WAY, WAY MORE, in way more nations, and most importantly, THEY KILLED INDISCRIMINATELY.

Let's say, again, for the sake of the argument, that 6 gazillion did indeed perish in da holohoax, and that the germans did indeed scapegoat the chosen people for no reason whatsoever. They killed people they saw as a threat to their nation. Is that not less evil than indiscriminate industrial mass slaughters for the sheer goal of global domination? The communists slaughtered everyone, EVERYONE but the useful, low intelligence workers (and the chosen people at the top of course). All intellectuals, artists, anyone who was not an able manual laborer.

Another thing is the people themselves, all communist nations EVER have been miserable. However, in all observable historical records, including pictures and videos, the germans adored Hitler. How could they not love the man that saved them from the weimar times? Communists not only were poor and unsuccessful, they hated life.

Even if all these crimes were committed, national socialism worked, communism did way, WAY, WAY WAY WAAAYY worse, and not only that, but it never even fucking worked! in the many times it was tried, it never created a successful nation (of course we know that it is only a tool for jewish control, but i am echoing the thoughts of my younger self here)

So looking at this objectively. How can anyone claim it is a better ideology than national socialism and support it in any way whatsoever? Even more so if they view Hitler's regime as evil, because of the contrast i mentioned in my post.

>muh it wasn't tried really i mean in my version everyone is happy just let me try again maybe this time after the 500th industrial scale slaughter my childish fantasy will be achieved

surely has to get old sometime
You must log in or sign up to comment
21 comments:
deleted 1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror )
Mirrored from scored.co
4
KingSweyn on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
>How can anyone claim it is a better ideology than national socialism and support it in any way whatsoever?

They didn't reason their way into this opinion. They were guilted and shamed into believing it.

Hitler's National Socialism is "the worst thing ever" because there is exactly no room for jewish parasitism. Plus they made jews shave their jewcurls and do unpaid labor, oh god the horror. They hate any system where they can't control the currency, NatSoc uses labor-backed currency, and since the jews wouldn't acknowledge the reichsmark they were forced to trade in goods. But that reveals something profound:

**The answer to the international banking system is the international BARTER system.**

No place to put usury, y'see?
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
Delon on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
i am speaking of modern day normie "communists" who are not subverters. Clearly one look at history should tell them that supporting this ideology is retarded.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
> why

Because they do every single thing possible to smear Germany as much as possible. It's ridiculous, but it seems to work.

> and most importantly, THEY KILLED INDISCRIMINATELY.

Well, primarily Christians and dissidents. But they had arrest quotas, and sometimes they literally arrested random people walking on the street. And being arrested means being shipped to some place, being kept at minimal knowledge, and being tortured into signing a confession, which landed you in a gulag.

> killed WAY, WAY MORE

Yes. I said that many times, even when I wasn't aware of the jewish problem. How comes we all conveniently forget that communism is by FAR worse and evil than what they claim NatSoc was? And btw, being a literal slave in a gulag for 8-25 years with eventual death from exhaustion isn't exactly pleasant. jews came up with all sort of fictional nonsense about the holocaust, but even that doesn't even come close to the cruelty communists applied FOR MANY DECADES.

> because of the contrast i mentioned in my post.

I never heard an answer when I mentioned these things btw.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
> let's say, for the sake of argument, that the nazis did indeed murder 60 trillion chosen people in da shoah. We of course know better, but bear with me. Communism, as an ideology, killed WAY, WAY MORE, in way more nations, and most importantly, THEY KILLED INDISCRIMINATELY.

So did the British.

That the Bolsheviks were worse than the Germans is the entry level redpill. The real redpill is that the British were even worse then that.

It was the British who started mass murdering civilians indiscriminately, for no military purpose, for the whole war.
The British even developed a plan to mass murder millions of Europeans with anthrax.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
Delon on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
i didn't even touch on the genocide of germans after the war. what was articulated in the op were my thoughts at a younger age before "getting redpilled". simple logic arrived at through mere observation.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
The answer is racism.

Due to Christianity, racism is seen as the greatest evil. Racism contradicts the whole ideology of Christianity (that the Jewish god made us all "in his image" and that each soul has free will). Communism does not. In fact, communism is trying to implement what is described in the book of Acts.

The fact that we are Christian society is the sole reason for why normies will always consider National Socialism worse than communism, regardless of bodycount.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>Due to Christianity, racism is seen as the greatest evil.

I'm sorry, what? Christianity has acknowledged the right for nations to exist and defend their borders from the very beginning. It is liberal humanism, which is basically an implicit rejection of Christianity, where the whole "one race, the human race" nonsense began. In fact, the only thing the jews have attacked with more fervor than Racial Awareness is Christianity itself, substituting for it Liberal Humanist teachings disguised as Christian ones where they couldnt outright destroy it.

>communism is trying to implement what is described in the book of Acts

Communism is not trying to implement a distributist society where everyone owns property but is willing to share it for the greater good of the community, and communism certainly is not trying to implement a society based on the worship of Jesus Christ as Lord and God.

>The fact that we are Christian society

Havent been one for 500 years, even the Mohammedans are more Christian the modern Liberal Humanist west, which has killed Christianity and hidden the body, flayed its skin, and put it on as some sort of grotesque and blasphemous garment.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
> It is liberal humanism, which is basically an implicit rejection of Christianity, where the whole "one race, the human race" nonsense began.

"One race the human race" comes from Christianity. Can you not see it? The original libtards (e.g. Locke) where Christians. They believed that as we are all children of the same god who created us all in his image, and not children of our biological father, then we are all equal - at least we have equal worth, if we're not identical.

I challenged this forum to give me the name of one member of the Church who was openly racist, present or past. Nobody could do it.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>"One race the human race" comes from Christianity.

No, it comes from a *perversion* of Christian teachings by Heretics like Locke, as you mentioned. Anyone who actually has read the bible could tell you that just because God claims all men as Children created in His Image (but so too are the angels), that does not mean they are equal to each other or to God himself. In fact, if the children all coming from a single family are often vastly different and certainly not equal, how much more would the Children of God be? The Bible has a literal parable detailing how different Christians can be from one another (the parable of the talents, to be exact). To read the bible and to believe God in any way believes in Egalitarianism is to be profoundly illiterate. Jews and heretics quote many passages in it out of context to justify such a misreading to those who are too lazy to read it themselves, but reading the entire work makes it abundantly clear modern Liberalized "Christianity" has *nothing* to do with the actual teachings of Christ Himself, and is merely a shallow jewish imitation of the real deal, created on the foundation of Liberal Humanism, and in direct opposition to the will of God.

As for "racist" Christians, literally any random peasant from before the 1800s would be openly in favor of putting his own nation as his first priority above others, because it is a fulfillment of Christ's command to love your brother. Nationalism is brotherly love applied to ones extended family, one cannot reject one's own nation (unless it has sunk so far into wickedness that it is unsalvageable and the only course one has is to warn others not follow in its path) and be a Christian.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> that does not mean they are equal to each other or to God himself

I agree with you that the New Testament does not claim that all men are equal. However, the denial of the importance of genetic inheritance is what opened the door to libtards to at least claim that their egalitarian theories were based on Christianity.

> As for "racist" Christians, literally any random peasant from before the 1800s would be openly in favor of putting his own nation as his first priority above others

Random peasants, yes. But how about members of the Church? Can you find any quote from a Pope that is nationalist? I don't think so.


Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Well, Popes are generally supposed to remain neutral in national disputes to ensure that both sides can come to a peaceable agreement.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Once you realize that the majority of humans operate on emotions, and the jews exploit this, all the commie love and hitler hate makes sense. I remember that in public school, when we were being fed the holocaust propaganda, it was *incredibly* emotionally charged. And of couse, very few people question what theyre taught from birth unless the (((media))) tells them to. Most people are given a one-sided view of history as early as it can be shoved down their throats (if our society were honest, it would call it what it is, brainwashing), and thus will *never* question it, especially if it is constantly reinforced in all media that they consume later in life. It is a mountain of lies and half truths, and the only way to fight against it (that is, without physical violence) is to turn their weapons of propaganda against them, by packaging the truth in an emotionally charged manner, perhaps the brainwashed masses can be reached.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
IndomitiusOfCapua on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
The economic achievements of Hitler are overstated by many on the right.

I've studied in detail the economic situation and here's what actually happened.

Germany owed tons of reparations (war debts) after WWI to other countries. In fact, they owed so much that Germany was unable to invest money into their own economy. Essentially, Germans were treated as slave labor for the rest of Europe. Germany was so in debt they weren't paying what they owed because they couldn't so they were paying as much as they could. This wasn't good enough for many countries (especially France) in Europe and it was creating a lot of tension. In order to calm the tensions in Europe, the Americans decided they were going to lend money to Germany to develop their industry so Germany could become richer in order to afford to repay their debt. The Americans lent a shitton of money to Germany for development and it was this money that essentially turned Germany around. When Hitler came to power, all Hitler did to "turn the economy around" is decide not to repay the debt back. That was it. There was no other master plan or anything. The Americans had already laid the foundation for Germany's economy through significant investment in the prior years and Hitler simply realized the prosperity of this investment without having to repay anyone back for the investment.

Anyone and I do mean anyone could have assumed control of Germany and if their only decision was to not repay Germany's debt then they would have had just as much economic success as Hitler. He was no economic genius and National Socialism is not some amazing economic political doctrine. It's just a simple case of foreign investment without repayment. That would enhance the wealth of any country that did the same.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
Delon on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
the point is who else would have had the balls to see this and do it?
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
IndomitiusOfCapua on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
Fair but also Hitler lost and arguably the reason the Americans got involved is because they wanted their investment back.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
Delon on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
they got involved because the kikes said so
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Fucking liar.
I bet you also claim that America gave a net sum of money to Germany after the war. Muh Marshall plan.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
How's the weather in Tel Aviv, Moshe?

America didn't give money to Germany. In the [Young Plan in 1930](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Plan) they simply stated how much Germany was to pay for reparations.

Hitler didn't pay the reparations that he was supposed to pay according to the Young Plan, but it's not that he borrowed money from America and didn't pay *that* back. He didn't borrow shit.

> their only decision was to not repay Germany's debt

As I said, it wasn't debt for something they borrowed. It was war reparations that they should not have given in the first place.

> He was no economic genius and National Socialism is not some amazing economic political doctrine.

He was, and it is. The genius is that when you give a nation hope and community consciousness and collective solidarity, they work much harder than in a capitalist system, because every Aryan genuinely wants to do well for his community.

Jews on the other hand only think of their own individual self-interest, and this is their framework for every economic system they invent. This is why Jews are not biologically capable of understanding how Hitler fixed the economy.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
free-will-of-choice on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
>How can anyone claim it is a better...

If nature implies moving value, and each one within evaluation thereof...then affixing (claim) a value (better or worse) tempts one to ignore being (life) moved (inception towards death).

Consenting to suggested (information); while ignoring perceivable (inspiration) makes one a CLAIMER which establishes self as claimant (slave) and another as benefactor (master).

Within a moving nature one needs to resist the wanted temptation to hold onto anything.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message