This is something i was pondering as a young lad, back when i still believed in history books. Why are Hitler's achievements never ever mentioned? The man took the absolute wretch of a dying nation that was the weimar republic into the most mighty single nation in all of europe, within a few short years.
Now on the topic of genocides, let's say, for the sake of argument, that the nazis did indeed murder 60 trillion chosen people in da shoah. We of course know better, but bear with me. Communism, as an ideology, killed WAY, WAY MORE, in way more nations, and most importantly, THEY KILLED INDISCRIMINATELY.
Let's say, again, for the sake of the argument, that 6 gazillion did indeed perish in da holohoax, and that the germans did indeed scapegoat the chosen people for no reason whatsoever. They killed people they saw as a threat to their nation. Is that not less evil than indiscriminate industrial mass slaughters for the sheer goal of global domination? The communists slaughtered everyone, EVERYONE but the useful, low intelligence workers (and the chosen people at the top of course). All intellectuals, artists, anyone who was not an able manual laborer.
Another thing is the people themselves, all communist nations EVER have been miserable. However, in all observable historical records, including pictures and videos, the germans adored Hitler. How could they not love the man that saved them from the weimar times? Communists not only were poor and unsuccessful, they hated life.
Even if all these crimes were committed, national socialism worked, communism did way, WAY, WAY WAY WAAAYY worse, and not only that, but it never even fucking worked! in the many times it was tried, it never created a successful nation (of course we know that it is only a tool for jewish control, but i am echoing the thoughts of my younger self here)
So looking at this objectively. How can anyone claim it is a better ideology than national socialism and support it in any way whatsoever? Even more so if they view Hitler's regime as evil, because of the contrast i mentioned in my post.
>muh it wasn't tried really i mean in my version everyone is happy just let me try again maybe this time after the 500th industrial scale slaughter my childish fantasy will be achieved
surely has to get old sometime
I've studied in detail the economic situation and here's what actually happened.
Germany owed tons of reparations (war debts) after WWI to other countries. In fact, they owed so much that Germany was unable to invest money into their own economy. Essentially, Germans were treated as slave labor for the rest of Europe. Germany was so in debt they weren't paying what they owed because they couldn't so they were paying as much as they could. This wasn't good enough for many countries (especially France) in Europe and it was creating a lot of tension. In order to calm the tensions in Europe, the Americans decided they were going to lend money to Germany to develop their industry so Germany could become richer in order to afford to repay their debt. The Americans lent a shitton of money to Germany for development and it was this money that essentially turned Germany around. When Hitler came to power, all Hitler did to "turn the economy around" is decide not to repay the debt back. That was it. There was no other master plan or anything. The Americans had already laid the foundation for Germany's economy through significant investment in the prior years and Hitler simply realized the prosperity of this investment without having to repay anyone back for the investment.
Anyone and I do mean anyone could have assumed control of Germany and if their only decision was to not repay Germany's debt then they would have had just as much economic success as Hitler. He was no economic genius and National Socialism is not some amazing economic political doctrine. It's just a simple case of foreign investment without repayment. That would enhance the wealth of any country that did the same.
I bet you also claim that America gave a net sum of money to Germany after the war. Muh Marshall plan.
America didn't give money to Germany. In the [Young Plan in 1930](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Plan) they simply stated how much Germany was to pay for reparations.
Hitler didn't pay the reparations that he was supposed to pay according to the Young Plan, but it's not that he borrowed money from America and didn't pay *that* back. He didn't borrow shit.
> their only decision was to not repay Germany's debt
As I said, it wasn't debt for something they borrowed. It was war reparations that they should not have given in the first place.
> He was no economic genius and National Socialism is not some amazing economic political doctrine.
He was, and it is. The genius is that when you give a nation hope and community consciousness and collective solidarity, they work much harder than in a capitalist system, because every Aryan genuinely wants to do well for his community.
Jews on the other hand only think of their own individual self-interest, and this is their framework for every economic system they invent. This is why Jews are not biologically capable of understanding how Hitler fixed the economy.