This is something i was pondering as a young lad, back when i still believed in history books. Why are Hitler's achievements never ever mentioned? The man took the absolute wretch of a dying nation that was the weimar republic into the most mighty single nation in all of europe, within a few short years.
Now on the topic of genocides, let's say, for the sake of argument, that the nazis did indeed murder 60 trillion chosen people in da shoah. We of course know better, but bear with me. Communism, as an ideology, killed WAY, WAY MORE, in way more nations, and most importantly, THEY KILLED INDISCRIMINATELY.
Let's say, again, for the sake of the argument, that 6 gazillion did indeed perish in da holohoax, and that the germans did indeed scapegoat the chosen people for no reason whatsoever. They killed people they saw as a threat to their nation. Is that not less evil than indiscriminate industrial mass slaughters for the sheer goal of global domination? The communists slaughtered everyone, EVERYONE but the useful, low intelligence workers (and the chosen people at the top of course). All intellectuals, artists, anyone who was not an able manual laborer.
Another thing is the people themselves, all communist nations EVER have been miserable. However, in all observable historical records, including pictures and videos, the germans adored Hitler. How could they not love the man that saved them from the weimar times? Communists not only were poor and unsuccessful, they hated life.
Even if all these crimes were committed, national socialism worked, communism did way, WAY, WAY WAY WAAAYY worse, and not only that, but it never even fucking worked! in the many times it was tried, it never created a successful nation (of course we know that it is only a tool for jewish control, but i am echoing the thoughts of my younger self here)
So looking at this objectively. How can anyone claim it is a better ideology than national socialism and support it in any way whatsoever? Even more so if they view Hitler's regime as evil, because of the contrast i mentioned in my post.
>muh it wasn't tried really i mean in my version everyone is happy just let me try again maybe this time after the 500th industrial scale slaughter my childish fantasy will be achieved
surely has to get old sometime
No, it comes from a *perversion* of Christian teachings by Heretics like Locke, as you mentioned. Anyone who actually has read the bible could tell you that just because God claims all men as Children created in His Image (but so too are the angels), that does not mean they are equal to each other or to God himself. In fact, if the children all coming from a single family are often vastly different and certainly not equal, how much more would the Children of God be? The Bible has a literal parable detailing how different Christians can be from one another (the parable of the talents, to be exact). To read the bible and to believe God in any way believes in Egalitarianism is to be profoundly illiterate. Jews and heretics quote many passages in it out of context to justify such a misreading to those who are too lazy to read it themselves, but reading the entire work makes it abundantly clear modern Liberalized "Christianity" has *nothing* to do with the actual teachings of Christ Himself, and is merely a shallow jewish imitation of the real deal, created on the foundation of Liberal Humanism, and in direct opposition to the will of God.
As for "racist" Christians, literally any random peasant from before the 1800s would be openly in favor of putting his own nation as his first priority above others, because it is a fulfillment of Christ's command to love your brother. Nationalism is brotherly love applied to ones extended family, one cannot reject one's own nation (unless it has sunk so far into wickedness that it is unsalvageable and the only course one has is to warn others not follow in its path) and be a Christian.
I agree with you that the New Testament does not claim that all men are equal. However, the denial of the importance of genetic inheritance is what opened the door to libtards to at least claim that their egalitarian theories were based on Christianity.
> As for "racist" Christians, literally any random peasant from before the 1800s would be openly in favor of putting his own nation as his first priority above others
Random peasants, yes. But how about members of the Church? Can you find any quote from a Pope that is nationalist? I don't think so.