New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
27
Spell it Right (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by TheRedPilledArtist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +27Score on mirror )
So racist in fact that the only way I can live tolerably is to have a White Ethnostate. Now I know its currently illegal, but do you want me to inflict my racism field on non Whites whereever I go and cause them undue stress?

No of course you dont.

So to help the BiPOC plight and remove racists from your society like myself, I kindly ask you make it legal to have a White Ethnostate.

We both win. You dont have racists and my racism field holding your BiPOC from reaching their potential. You also get to diversify your society more with the removal of Whites to our Ethnostate. And in return I get a White Ethnostate that will surely fail because Diversity is your strength and we wont have that, thus we will be weak and be an example to prove your statement.

What do you say?
28
FEMA (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by DukeCannon on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +28Score on mirror )
75
posted 1 year ago by PopularCancer on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +75Score on mirror )
46
posted 1 year ago by diogenesOTarch on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +46Score on mirror )
12
posted 1 year ago by Parcival on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror )
118
New Foxford (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by Careless_Ejaculator on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +118Score on mirror )
59
posted 1 year ago by PopularCancer on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +59Score on mirror )
15
posted 1 year ago by Ihatetheanti-Christ on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +15Score on mirror )
Even today, Jewish lackeys attempt to disrupt our storm march against the Jewish world rulers, trying to stop us or even cause us to fail. Below are some tips on how to wrest these cudgels from your opponent and turn them against him.

*Argument 1:* "Religion, you say, is a private matter. But you are fighting against the Jewish religion!"

- Counterargument: “Actually, the Jewish religion is nothing other than a doctrine to preserve the Jewish race.” (Adolf Hitler). “In resisting all government attempts to nationalise them, the Jews build a state within the state" (Count Helmuth von Moltke). “It is one of the most ingenious tricks ever invented to call this state a ‘religion'." (Adolf Hitler). “From this first and greatest lie that Jewry is a religion, not a race, further lies inevitably follow.” (Adolf Hitler).

*Argument 2:* “There are also decent Jews!”

- Counterargument: “This little phrase ‘also’ proves that these few exceptions have no bearing significance on our battle against Jewry as a whole. Martin Luther recognised four hundred years ago that this “decency,” proven by charitable deeds done as publicly as possible, is nothing but a hidden cost of business, which is repaid a thousand times by unenlightened Germans: “Know, dear Christian, and have no doubt that after the Devil you have no more bitter, more poisonous and more violent enemy than a genuine Jew. . . If they do something good, know that it is not done out of love or for your own good, but because they seek to win our favour, they must demonstrate goodness. But their heart remains as I have said!”

*Argument 3:* “The Jew sells cheaper than the German businessman.”

- Counterargument: Any fraudster can sell junk cheaply. Jewish fraudsters have mad thousands of German businessmen destitute through the glittering, fraudulent splendor of their department store palaces. Anyone who has bought good products more cheaply from the Jews than from Germans, could only do so because the united Jewish firms force down prices from the manufacturers, thereby depressing workers’ wages. He who has bought good products cheaply from the Jew should never forget that on every such piece there is the curse of a German worker and the tears of his starving children!

*Argument 4:* “There are also ‘white Jews’

- Counterargument: “This is not proof for, but against the Jew! The fact that the crooked Germans among us are called ‘white Jews’ is proof that being a Jew implies something bad. Otherwise, crooked Germans could be called ‘gutless Christians.’ The fact that there are many ‘white Jews’ shows that the destructive Jewish spirit has already contaminated wide circles of our country. Another warning for us to take up the fight against the Jewish world plague across the board.” (Joseph Goebbels). That is why Point 24 of our party program states: “The party battles the Jewish-materialistic spirit within and outside of us.”

*Argument 5:* “Mr. Levi is no longer a Jew because he was baptised!” — Counterargument: Jewry, as I have already stated, is not a religion.

- This must have been, as the Führer once mocked during the period of struggle, a peculiar sort of religion whose adherents could be recognised by their smell from a great distance! No, a Jew always remains a Jew. Chaim Herz Bückeberg, better known as “Heinrich Heine,” joked: “These long noses are a kind of uniform by which the God King Jehovah recognises his old guardsmen, even if they have deserted.” “I have no desire to convert the Jews,” Martin Luther wrote, “since that is impossible.” A Jew remains a Jew. “In the worst case, a dose of baptismal water saves both business and Jewry at the same time!” (Adolf Hitler).

*Argument 6:* “Mr. Moses Freundenstein is a Jew, but his parents and grandparents lived here. He is an Old German.”

- Counterargument: Just as a goat cannot mare a horse, even if his father and grandfather were in the same stable, a Jew can never become a German, even if his forebear came to Germany as an attendant to Quinctilius Varus.

*Argument 7:* “The Jew is a human being, too!”

- Counterargument: “Of course the Jew is a human being. None of us has ever doubted this. But the flea is also an animal. But not a pleasant one. Since a flea is not a pleasant animal, we have no duty before us to guard and protect it, to let it thrive so that it stings and torments and tortures us. Rather, we render it harmless. It is the same with the Jews.” (Joseph Goebbels).

*Argument 8:* “Everything with a human nature is equal.”

- Counterargument: Thirteen years ago, the Stürmer carried a cartoon. In it, a miserable pig looked up from his sty to a royal lion. “Everything with an animal nature is equal!” But what did the lion growl in reply? “That’s what you swine would like to think!”

*Argument 9:* “Anti-Semitism is only for the stupid!”

- Counterargument: You no longer hears this lie in National Socialist Germany. But one still reads it in the Jewish emigrant press abroad, and even today the Jew whispers it here and perhaps some Jewish lackeys think it. In contrast we smile, that the Jews have never produced a single creative man, but that all great men of all countries have been irreconcilable enemies of the Jews. Many “intellectuals” may be distressed by this call of superiority, but we unswervingly follow the battle cry against Jewry that our great men have made since ancient times!

*Argument 10:* “Can you accept responsibility for the misery that the Third Reich has brought upon thousands of Jewish families?”

- Counterargument: “It is nothing short of a miracle that absolutely nothing has happened to the Jews of Germany, but rather little by little are the rights they stole from the Germans in politics and culture being restored.” (Alfred Rosenberg). But even if a few hundred Jewish families in Germany really did have to starve. Nothing, absolutely nothing, can compare to the many millions of German families that the Jews have murdered over the centuries through wars, revolutions, and civil strife, and brought to ruin through usury, fraud, and deceit. “In the fight for the Race, there is no pact. If you are determined finally to defend yourself, German people, then be merciless!” (Adolf Hitler).
28
posted 1 year ago by Redpilled2Depression on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +28Score on mirror )
69
Yes jewish. Every single time (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by derjudenjager on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +69Score on mirror )
53
What a Weird Employee Pool... (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by diogenesOTarch on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +53Score on mirror )
50
We don't hate them enough (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by PopularCancer on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +50Score on mirror )
33
posted 1 year ago by MLJFireDragon747 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +33Score on mirror )
21
just like us (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by Ihatetheanti-Christ on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +21Score on mirror )
79
May i ask why? (cdn.videy.co)
posted 1 year ago by Delon on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +79Score on mirror )
58
Niggers are not human (www.youtube.com)
posted 1 year ago by nogangonbang on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +58Score on mirror )
27
posted 1 year ago by TribeAndTrain on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +27Score on mirror )
In my time on this forum I read of several users who were addicted to pornography, and most users on here consider it a great evil. As a real expert of sex and pornography, I'll share my thoughts on the matter in the hope that this may be useful to someone.


------- WHY IS PORNOGRAPHY BAD FOR YOU? -------

In "normal" hardcore porn you watch a man fucking a woman. Everything is focused on the woman. You see the woman enjoy it, moaning, having fun, reaching orgasm, being satisfied. Conversely, there's nothing about the man's pleasure. You never see the man's face, you don't hear the man moan, you don't see the man enjoying himself. While you may think this is a good thing, this is actually a terrible thing. Because your brain receives the message that being fucked (and not fucking) is pleasurable. This is the key point. Your brain learns that receiving dick leads to pleasure. This over time turns you into a faggot. I'm absolutely serious about this. I've seen a lot of evidence of this process on the internet. I would estimate that at least half of men who have sex with men do not like men at all. They only like the act of being fucked. If you hang out in gay communities, this is openly talked about. Plenty of guys in gay forums openly say that they are not attracted to men. I've even seen some guys saying that they are "homosexual" but not "homoromantic" because while they like engaging in sodomy, they would never see themselves with a man romantically. Think about this: for a normal man it's much easier to make a woman kiss you, than to suck your dick. For homos it's the opposite. Gay men like dick, few of them like men. It is hard for a normal person to conceive wanting to have sex with someone but not wanting to kiss him or her, but that's just normal for faggots: it's easier to get your dick sucked than to be kissed.

Porn will take you away from your natural role of man, and turn you into a faggot. This will make you weaker in every aspect of your life, especially (but not only) approaching women. You've trained your brain into thinking that being humiliated and being in hands of someone else is pleasurable, therefore you're not strong and assertive and a warrior anymore; you're passive and weak. You will feel less manly in your daily life, which will have a negative impact in your job, your relationships, etc. It will also compromise your sense of self-preservation, as the most pleasurable thing you can think of (being sodomized) is a very risky activity and sooner or later you'll come to accept the health risks.

------- WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT IT? -------

Sexual instinct is perfectly natural, and so is the desire to see naked women. It's just part of our nature, and fighting against our nature will lead you to be miserable and ultimately fail. This is why users on here tried to quit porn cold turkey and even stopped jerking off, but they relapse. Your body needs sexual stimulation, and if you can go more than a week without sexual stimulation then go to check your testosterone levels because you're not healthy. Only high stress, overwork, physical illness, or depression can make a man not feel sexual stimuli.

Obviously the best solution is finding a girlfriend / wife, but that's like saying to a homeless man to just become a millionaire.

The best solution is to reduce the intensity of the porn that you watch. We've established that the problem is watching a woman (or a troon) being fucked by another man, while wanting to look at naked women is normal. Therefore, you're now allowed to watch only women on their own.
You probably don't know this, but places like Reddit have porn of all kind, including stuff that you've never even imagined. On Reddit you can find lots of porn which is too hardcore for PornHub, but you can also find all sort of "soft" pornography. This ranges from women playing with dildos in their ass, to women showing off their butt in yoga pants. And everything in between. You should quit hardcore pornography by going in stages, for example: woman who plays with dildo > woman who masturbates with her hand > woman naked spreading > woman naked not spreading > woman in bikini. You should also try to get aroused less by the asshole and more by the pussy, and then more by the tits.

------- WHY DOES THIS WORK? -------

Because watching a naked woman (alone, without a man) will stimulate your brain to have the opposite reaction of what hardcore porn does. Seeing a naked woman will raise your testosterone, your manliness, your assertiveness, and your aggressiveness, as you image yourself fucking her. In watching another man fucking a woman you are being cucked: you are on the sideline watching and playing a passive role. A woman on her own tells your brain that she is there for you to take her. Therefore it makes you more manly, because you image yourself fucking the woman that you're seeing. This will also give you a great motivation to improve your life so that you can actually find a woman. I've often looked at photos of hot naked sluts to motivate me to go out of the house to go to the gym, thinking of them while I was lifting weights (obviously looking at hot sluts IRL has the same effect). It's scientifically proven that seeing women raises your testosterone.

Importantly, this will substantially decrease the amount of porn that you consume. Why is that? Because a porn addiction can only be sustained by hardcore porn, as very sick images will turn a natural sexual need into a compulsion. You know you are addicted to porn if you don't feel aroused, but still want to watch it and you jerk off more out of boredom. If you limit yourself to only watching women (not performing a sexual act) then your sexual desires will remain within normal bounds. In fact, you will find it incredibly hard to get aroused by only watching a naked woman at first. This is a pain period that you will have to go through, and you will have to be abstinent for several days or even a couple of weeks before your brain resets and you start getting aroused with normal stuff. But eventually it will become normal to be aroused only by seeing a naked woman, as nature intended, and you won't feel the need to watch hardcore porn. You'll feel the need to jerk off only when you have your balls fulls, and not as a compulsion, and you'll see that you won't jerk off more often than once every couple of days on average. Nobody with a porn addiction is jerking off to pictures of women's tits. Soft core stuff is not able to elicit the emotional reaction that is needed to form an addition. In the old days, kids would jerk off to magazines like Playboy and nobody was a coomer. Coomers are a product of hardcore pornography. And yes of course, [every single time](https://jewishcontributions.com/cards/110-al-goldstein/).



60
Balls Deep in a 4 Year Old (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by diogenesOTarch on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +60Score on mirror )
I just watched this video in YT recommended --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNjgltkqTzc&ab_channel=EmperorTigerstar

The tldw of the video is that there was some feudal state part of the UK that technically existed until 2008. It came to an end when two (((billionaires))) show up and started buying up property on the island. Then they started demanding (((democracy))) and (((lobbying))) for lower taxes and reduced power of Seigneur (the owner of the fief). When (((they))) didn't get what they wanted they started closing down businesses and destroying the economy of the island in retaliation.

Some guy claim to be the heir to the title watched the video and made a comment. Someone replied to him asking him why they don't raise a militia and kick the (((billionaires))) off the island and seize the property back for the people. He responded by saying that would be a violation of (((international law))). (((international law))) states that a state can't seize property from an individual using military force without some kind of justification.

So there it is. This island got kiked and couldn't retaliate because (((international law))) wouldn't allow them to use force. They would have to use legal maneuvers or buy up all the property back (aka compete with money). The entire system is designed to remove your power, and exploit the power that the (((elites))) have over you. With jews, you always lose.
25
A forum poem. (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +25Score on mirror )
Toast message