That statue is really sublime
who's the sculptor?
who's the sculptor?
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
14 comments:
James Earle Fraser. It's the Guardianship sculpture in front of the National Archives Building in Washington, D.C.
Based, apparently America’s statues, symbols, impressions etc feature more depictions of actual fascists than any country in Europe.
because Europe is literally occupied
there is a reason why we have American bases all over, its not to guard against "evul Rassia" its to guard against US
there is a reason why we have American bases all over, its not to guard against "evul Rassia" its to guard against US
America was founded as a fascist ethnostate. The [American School](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_School_(economics)) is pretty much how fascism works in the economic field.
Libtards like Jefferson were not the only Founding Fathers, and even Jefferson was for taxpayer funded education, for example. The idea that America was founded as lolbertarian utopia is just a lie.
And yes, there's a lot of examples of the use of the fasces. They are very prominent [in the House](https://blog.tampaprep.org/hubfs/Being%20Earnest%20Blog/Images/Menu%20Images/House%20of%20Reps.png#keepProtocol) to this day.
Libtards like Jefferson were not the only Founding Fathers, and even Jefferson was for taxpayer funded education, for example. The idea that America was founded as lolbertarian utopia is just a lie.
And yes, there's a lot of examples of the use of the fasces. They are very prominent [in the House](https://blog.tampaprep.org/hubfs/Being%20Earnest%20Blog/Images/Menu%20Images/House%20of%20Reps.png#keepProtocol) to this day.
I just finished a short book 'how to be a fascist - a manual' by michela murgia (Italian translation). It reads like a manifesto of how much better and more prosperous a country is under fascism as opposed to bi-party democracy which is a useless waste of everybody's time and resources. It is concise and an easy read, I recommend it
I’ve read some reviews of the book, and quite a couple view it as a work of satire.
Sorry, I should have pointed that out. It is kind of pitched as satire but unashamedly states many many positive elements of fascism. It probably wouldn't go to print in the UK otherwise. If you wanted a book that made you dislike fascism you would be very disappointed, I think the 'satire' is the only way to get the ideas in front of the right audience.
Toast message
By making westerners afraid of “Fascism”, we have been programmed to be afraid of unity.
Why are our groups in the nationalist sphere not united? Because we have been programmed to be against unity.
For all those who question the narrative of history, think of who were the historical enemies of Fascism. Have these groups who have been pushing against Fascism since the 1920’s been in our favor?
History shows us, that the nations that embraced Fascism, that weren’t scared of Fascism, that learned from Fascism, went on their greatest national revival in modern times.
The solution has been in our faces the whole time, yet we were programmed to be afraid of it because the “good guys” always won in history.
Is it not appropriate to be united under a word that properly defines unity in the Roman sense, that word being “Fascist”?
If we told you, that you can save your countrymen and people by not being afraid of a word (words have power), would you take it?
Would you embrace Fascism(unity)?
The truth is the truth, even if it has 100 votes. A lie is a lie, even if it has 100 million votes.
Even worse, we have been programmed to see disunity as a virtue and not a weakness. Jew (((diversity))) is quite literally disunity at the natural level, every time two different species that fulfill the same niche in nature come into contact, one will inevitably wipe out the other. The only time this *doesn't* happen is when these two species are kept separate, and humans are much the same, whether it be in regards to race or other conflicting types of identity. Only an absolute lunatic or someone who *wants* conflict would deign to attempt to put competing groups of humans in the same area. The shabbos practitioners of liberals fall into the former category, while the jews (or at least the ones running the show) fall into the latter, since the stated goal of their satanic religion is attempting to reduce everything into complete disorder by dissolving all boundaries and breaking all barriers.