spengler

I have a few ideas on how to accomplish the above goal that vary in complexity, but im curious to hear some other takes on this.
 
One idea that i had was to form an on campus, unofficial self-improvement bookclub. During discussions of "chad" books that are still socially acceptable(stuff like junger and mishima) I would ask probing open ended questions. Based on the responses, I would continue private discussion with those that answered favorably, and then organically form a circle of those who passed my filters.

For a different age I was born,
every man has once said,
where each was to honor sworn,
rather to all this cowardice bred,
thus for a gilded time we mourn,
insisting such days forever dead.
 
Yet of all the feelings ever known,
longing for a time not your own,
is when true cowardice is shown,
especially if dark the age is grown,
for like dawn light in black sown,
all darkness will be overthrown.
 
All darkness will be overthrown.
 
Instead one is given a great gift,
born in darkness and darkest days,
he’s given trials, mountains to lift,
aye, the very minotaur in his maze,
he’s called to be strong, to be swift,
a hero upon which his sons gaze.
 
So appear you king or appear you slave,
among the good or a people strayed,
with actions now, the future pave,
for the coward is he who delayed,
product of his age, cradle to grave,
but an age makes not, it is man made.
 
It is man made.

There is this notion, popularized by the alt-right movement, that we will meme our ideas into existence and then, somehow, our new supporters will coalesce into a new version of the Nazi party. When the inevitable collapse hits, these people think that their group will sieze power. In short, they believe that history will repeat itself and give us a second chance. This idea is flawed for a few reasons, and i will list them out below.
  
1)The first issue is that of the power structure that we operate under. In the 1930's there were still many reactionary elements present in European governments, and there were even some working monarchies in place. The elites were willing to turn a blind eye to the fascists because they saw them as an antidote to the far left insurgents. Nowadays, our elites share many views with those far left insurgents. The elites do not want you to succeed. The elites have set up whole agencies that are tasked with stopping any sort of centralized movementarians. We have seen the effects of such a strategy clearly in the generation identity movement. The movement was doing very well, their numbers were swelling, but then their symbols were banned from public, their members were harrased, and most importantly, they were kicked off of social media.
  
2)In line with #1, the social media companies, which are property of the elites, are vital to the alt-right strategy. On social media platforms, you can find masses of normies in a situation that is perfect for propaganda. What a perfect place to send your memes(propanda) and change the minds of the normies, right? Well, the elites are also very well aware of this, and for this reason, they will do all that they can to deplatform you. They will call your memes hate speech. they will ban your accounts. they will destroy your communities. Your whole campaign will fizzle away, and in its place, the social media platform will be tweaked to showcase left wing propaganda. Also, since you were mostly posting memes, people dont have any substantial beliefs, so they will jump to the different thing for many different reasons(normies tend to have ephemeral views in this regard). Now they are forced to try and meme on alt-media, which sadly has a much smaller audience. Now, i do think that social media has its place in spreading right wing propaganda, but the alt-right went about this in the most inefficient way possible.
  
  
  
3)How do people go from snickering at memes online to actually organizing? Afterall, power = organization + money. We need some way to jump the bridge, and i saw no suggested solutions.
  
4)I think that the biggest argument against this strategy is the fact that it failed right before our eyes. We saw this rise from gamergate to its gradual decline after the election of trump. Now, its effectively dead
  
We need something that will actually get us serious people, who are organized and provide a viable alternative during the convergence of catastrophes. You can already see the solution, and it is largely the parallel society and decentralized resistance. These are proven techniques that have worked in countries like Poland, Palestine, Israel, America, the SA, South Africa, and the list goes on

Power = existing power * creativity, and maybe it is even squared. When it comes to power, creativity can be likened to nitrous in a car. Power allows you to exploit vectors of attack that the enemy never anticipated. Creativity allows you to maximize your resources, and creativity allows you to be nimble and outmaneuver a large, bloated enemy. In this aspect, the enemy has inadvertently given us a massive advantage. Due to the harsh constraints that the enemy has imposed on us, the creative faculties of the dissident right have now been forced to go into overdrive. No longer do we play in their system and expect the GOP to save us or have a cult of personality that can easily be taken out. Now we are exploring many different iterations of the parallel economy, decentralized movement, meta-politics, subversion, propaganda, analysis of the power structure, and so on.

Power = organization of likeminded people. Our enemies desperately want the dissident right to just shitpost and remain atomized. Well, I say NO to such an idea. I am aiming to achieve self mastery for something, after all.
  
Seek to use creative guerilla marketing tactics to meet likeminded people, look in the right places, ask probing open ended questions and if all that fails at least find serious people online.
  
When we establish networks then our networks receive emergent properties that allow us to achieve collectively more than we can than we could ever do on our own.