You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
PurestEvil on scored.co
2 months ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)
Of course he was a threat, a major even. Kirk had millions of conservative followers, and he seemed to be quite effective in his approach. Imagine a former zionist turns anti-zionist. He alone would have caused major damage to the interests of israel, by turning away millions of conservatives (prime zionists btw, more than leftists) from the "pro-israel cause" (his words).
And Kirk would have turned ALL the jewish donor money and TPUSA that made him against them. Meaning it was treason to the jews, and also a major threat that had to be taken care of as soon as possible. It was even time-critical, because if it would have been widely known that Kirk turned anti-israel, and it would have went on for months, it would be too late.
Can you imagine the narrative impact it would have had? "I was a lifelong jew cocksucker, but even I have enough of them and their genocide!" + "Let's talk about how the stereotypes about jewish donors are true..."
And Kirk would have turned ALL the jewish donor money and TPUSA that made him against them. Meaning it was treason to the jews, and also a major threat that had to be taken care of as soon as possible. It was even time-critical, because if it would have been widely known that Kirk turned anti-israel, and it would have went on for months, it would be too late.
Can you imagine the narrative impact it would have had? "I was a lifelong jew cocksucker, but even I have enough of them and their genocide!" + "Let's talk about how the stereotypes about jewish donors are true..."