"It only takes 1-3% of the population for a revolution"
(twitter.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Nick has said that he's against violence and is looking to build a political movement. Nick talked about that just last week; he's not going to get in front of a camera and tell anyone do commit "direct action" the way these outright commies can on YouTube and elsewhere without getting cancelled or arrested.
Besides, if he did make that video, would you follow through? Obviously not, so what would be the point? He's trying to build a political movement with momentum, not get anyone on a watchlist. He even tells guys NOT to announce themselves as Groypers, to work from the shadows, like jews do. Meanwhile, the clowns at Patriot Front are literally asking for names and addresses on their website.
Nick has sacrificed SO MUCH for naming the jews all these years, consistently. He's the ONLY real one!
"[Maybe his BEST monologue!](https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/19BsxmugAy/fuck-you-gtfo-/c)" 👉
Sure. And because he rejects violence, it has no chance of success. Violence *needs* to happen sooner or later, it is inevitable if we assume it's a political movement that is more than 1% better than the rest. He believes in "just vote harder goy" and "infiltrating the systems" across decades. The type of people attracted to positions of power and small-scale tyranny are the very people already in them.
> and tell anyone do commit "direct action"
Fair. If he'd do *anything* that could threaten the system, he'd be shut down. So far he serves as an ideal catcher for all people who became jew-aware over the past years to pacify them.
> Besides, if he did make that video, would you follow through?
If he were genuine and shows that he has the potential to be effective, I'd consider him worthy to be followed. I have watched him for a few months recently, and I grew rather annoyed by him, his views and plans. It's basically the "two-weeks-to-flatten-the-curve" for jew-aware people.
> He's trying to build a political movement with momentum
Or: Capture as many people who could do something effective and pacify them to do nothing but voot harder.
> He even tells guys NOT to announce themselves as Groypers, to work from the shadows, like jews do.
Fair. But there is no way there will be enough groypers in positions of power, finance and influence even in decades, to even make a dent.
> Nick has sacrificed SO MUCH for naming the jews
He... is a millionaire, right?...
Yeah, you don't watch the show.
> Or: Capture as many people who could do something effective and pacify them to do nothing but voot harder.
Yeah, you really don't watch the show. Nick has said that Trump winning '24 is what pacified everyone. That's why he says it would have been better for Kamala to win, because it would have pissed people off to be cheated twice and forced everyone to realize that voting is fake, that the Matrix is fake. The jews, however, realized that too and let Trump win, but forcing Vance on him as "insurance" if Trump didn't play ball. Nick has said all these things for months during which you claim to have been watching the show ... remember?
> He... is a millionaire, right?...
Yes, he is now. And that's what it takes to do what he does, to ward off the jews and ANTIFA grifters who try to use "lawfare" to bully and bankrupt people in court. It's also what it takes to run a media company with any kind of outreach, travel for interviews, buy video equipment, pay video editors and host conventions. Nick isn't wasting his money on junk, he's going to be organizing phone banks and other campaign activities in the next election. That takes money ... which he's explained many, many times on the show you claim to watch.
I watched enough to get a good impression of him. Various interviews, various podcasts. I watched through some channels on YouTube that was favorable of him.
> Nick has said that Trump winning '24 is what pacified everyone.
I am not saying that he is wrong. There are plenty of reasonable things he says, which is why I watched him for so long to begin with. But then come the questionable parts which are just too weird.
I can tell you the actual problems. I've recently written about it: https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ATCIpU2JL/happy-birthday-nickjfuentes-/c/4ed5vE8Ytan
> Nick has said all these things for months during which you claim to have been watching the show ... remember?
Here on ConPro we expressed for a long time anti-Trump sentiment, long before I watched (or even knew about) Fuentes. I am banned on TDW for multiple years already, banned 4 days after some timid comment I made that was critical of jews.
So what does Fuentes actually provide? More details on israel and Vance.
Did he talk about the holocaust? WWII? Hitler and National Socialists? Why the central banking system is so important to jews that they were eager to start a world war against them? Did he talk about the jews running the Transatlantic Slave Trade that brought niggers to America? Or about the connection of jews and Bolshevism, communism and Soviet Union? Or how the international jew declared war on Germany in 1933, stating that war will come upon Hitler if he wants it or not? And 6 years later *for some unknown reason* Poland massacred Germans in occupied Danzig?
Did he, as a dedicated talker, actually talk about these topics? You seem to know if he did - I doubt it, but tell me. Because israel isn't even the problem - it's the jews. All of them. Not over there in israel, but within our countries.
Now, if he'd do that, that would be much better than any movement he wants to create. He'd remain a talker, which is fine, but at least he'd talk about critically important matters.
> which he's explained many, many times on the show you claim to watch.
I obviously didn't watch all of his shows.
Those channels are often idiot grifters looking to monetize his popularity. Imagine if someone judged you based on what your neighbors thought about you? Why not just watch the show and hear from Nick directly, without the third-party interpretation?
Nick has talked about Scott Bessent, how he's a Soros plant, how he made his billions crashing economies for profit, and that Bessent's appointment is proof that Trump's admin is 100% kiked and a red flag that Trump would also get rich off Bessent crashing the U.S. economy. The show focuses on the present, but it does provide some history for context. It's a nightly show. How many times in a year can you do the same history lecture?
But Nick is talking about ZOG almost every night -- not that you'd know, since you (like everyone that talks shit about Nick) doesn't actually watch the show! 🙄
Probably. But Fuentes is banned on YouTube, but people who posted his videos with minimal commentary were not barred from it.
> Why not just watch the show and hear from Nick directly, without the third-party interpretation?
It was 90% him talking and 10% of the guy agreeing with him and glazing him. It's not some neighbor, but rather a fanboy who picks the best out of his idol.
> How many times in a year can you do the same history lecture?
Well, how often did he talk about the topics I mentioned? I suspect never.
> But Nick is talking about ZOG almost every night -- not that you'd know
I know. But it is not enough. It's rather entertainment if it doesn't lead to some fundamental conclusion like "oh, it's actually *all* jews" or "Democracy destroys us by having emotionally driven women make half the voting block, plus niggers who only want gibs."
I mean wow, government and jewish billionaires bad. Trump bad, Vance bad. Ah, what's ya gonna do? Nothing, vooot harder. Perhaps threatening to vote Democrats will totally terrify the Republicans and change them drastically!
No. Democrats would win, again, do 4 years of kikery at maximum degree, and then people will naturally want to vote Republicans again because Democrats suck. And then Republicans can be just as they were before, fervent zionist shabbos goyim, israel firsters, pro war on behalf of the jews.
And the best part? This is basically how Democracy is ideally supposed to work. Which still means heading towards our extinction, as shitskins are mass imported and the ratio of Whites decreases, and women vote retardedly.
The reason Fuentes is partly approved/tolerated by leftist-jewish institutions and corporations is because he goes against Trump and advocates to vote Democrats and swings the vote towards the left. And even leftists are critical of israel nowadays.
Given that he doesn't touch truly important topics (and I waited long for him to do so), he is just a benign talker. And that bored me, partially even annoyed me. Especially because he was somehow obsessed with going after other right-wing individuals, while he himself was nowhere close to ideal. He is also clearly arrogant, thinking *he* is the high-IQ antisemite, while we lowly peasants who want to solve the jewish problem are low-IQ antisemites.
Yeah, yeah, me unga-boonga kill all jews, jewish problem 100% solved.