"It only takes 1-3% of the population for a revolution"
(twitter.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
I watched enough to get a good impression of him. Various interviews, various podcasts. I watched through some channels on YouTube that was favorable of him.
> Nick has said that Trump winning '24 is what pacified everyone.
I am not saying that he is wrong. There are plenty of reasonable things he says, which is why I watched him for so long to begin with. But then come the questionable parts which are just too weird.
I can tell you the actual problems. I've recently written about it: https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ATCIpU2JL/happy-birthday-nickjfuentes-/c/4ed5vE8Ytan
> Nick has said all these things for months during which you claim to have been watching the show ... remember?
Here on ConPro we expressed for a long time anti-Trump sentiment, long before I watched (or even knew about) Fuentes. I am banned on TDW for multiple years already, banned 4 days after some timid comment I made that was critical of jews.
So what does Fuentes actually provide? More details on israel and Vance.
Did he talk about the holocaust? WWII? Hitler and National Socialists? Why the central banking system is so important to jews that they were eager to start a world war against them? Did he talk about the jews running the Transatlantic Slave Trade that brought niggers to America? Or about the connection of jews and Bolshevism, communism and Soviet Union? Or how the international jew declared war on Germany in 1933, stating that war will come upon Hitler if he wants it or not? And 6 years later *for some unknown reason* Poland massacred Germans in occupied Danzig?
Did he, as a dedicated talker, actually talk about these topics? You seem to know if he did - I doubt it, but tell me. Because israel isn't even the problem - it's the jews. All of them. Not over there in israel, but within our countries.
Now, if he'd do that, that would be much better than any movement he wants to create. He'd remain a talker, which is fine, but at least he'd talk about critically important matters.
> which he's explained many, many times on the show you claim to watch.
I obviously didn't watch all of his shows.
Those channels are often idiot grifters looking to monetize his popularity. Imagine if someone judged you based on what your neighbors thought about you? Why not just watch the show and hear from Nick directly, without the third-party interpretation?
Nick has talked about Scott Bessent, how he's a Soros plant, how he made his billions crashing economies for profit, and that Bessent's appointment is proof that Trump's admin is 100% kiked and a red flag that Trump would also get rich off Bessent crashing the U.S. economy. The show focuses on the present, but it does provide some history for context. It's a nightly show. How many times in a year can you do the same history lecture?
But Nick is talking about ZOG almost every night -- not that you'd know, since you (like everyone that talks shit about Nick) doesn't actually watch the show! 🙄
Probably. But Fuentes is banned on YouTube, but people who posted his videos with minimal commentary were not barred from it.
> Why not just watch the show and hear from Nick directly, without the third-party interpretation?
It was 90% him talking and 10% of the guy agreeing with him and glazing him. It's not some neighbor, but rather a fanboy who picks the best out of his idol.
> How many times in a year can you do the same history lecture?
Well, how often did he talk about the topics I mentioned? I suspect never.
> But Nick is talking about ZOG almost every night -- not that you'd know
I know. But it is not enough. It's rather entertainment if it doesn't lead to some fundamental conclusion like "oh, it's actually *all* jews" or "Democracy destroys us by having emotionally driven women make half the voting block, plus niggers who only want gibs."
I mean wow, government and jewish billionaires bad. Trump bad, Vance bad. Ah, what's ya gonna do? Nothing, vooot harder. Perhaps threatening to vote Democrats will totally terrify the Republicans and change them drastically!
No. Democrats would win, again, do 4 years of kikery at maximum degree, and then people will naturally want to vote Republicans again because Democrats suck. And then Republicans can be just as they were before, fervent zionist shabbos goyim, israel firsters, pro war on behalf of the jews.
And the best part? This is basically how Democracy is ideally supposed to work. Which still means heading towards our extinction, as shitskins are mass imported and the ratio of Whites decreases, and women vote retardedly.
The reason Fuentes is partly approved/tolerated by leftist-jewish institutions and corporations is because he goes against Trump and advocates to vote Democrats and swings the vote towards the left. And even leftists are critical of israel nowadays.
Given that he doesn't touch truly important topics (and I waited long for him to do so), he is just a benign talker. And that bored me, partially even annoyed me. Especially because he was somehow obsessed with going after other right-wing individuals, while he himself was nowhere close to ideal. He is also clearly arrogant, thinking *he* is the high-IQ antisemite, while we lowly peasants who want to solve the jewish problem are low-IQ antisemites.
Yeah, yeah, me unga-boonga kill all jews, jewish problem 100% solved.