New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
36
posted 2 days ago by USSDefiantJazz on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +36Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
ShekelJa on scored.co
1 day ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
The problem with calorie tracking is that people often do it with the assumption that they can eat anything they want but stay in budget to achieve the same outcome. While this may be the case logistically and thermodynamically, each food has its own biological and physiological impacts on the body.

Beginners would think they could live a life of junk food (but within budget) and be able to succeed in weight management. While some have succeeded, results have always varied. In fact, if it were that easy, we would not be at 75% overweight and 45% obesity.

That said, the risk with CICO is if paired with terrible food, you will need to maximize will power to resist the physiological consequences that would drive overeating.

When eating an ancestrally approrpaite diet, people often lose weight because the body no longer signals food for fuel because the body becomes increasingly fat-adapted, allowing it to efficiently access stored energy for fuel instead.

It is for this reason that people who lose weight eating intuitively using quality food, they attribute their progress due to a lack of appetite and complete forgetfulness to eat, resulting in meal skipping, suggesting their bodies preferentially use its own fuel for deficits rather than preferentially signaling ravenous hunger and cragives for exogenous fuel.
deleted 1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Toast message