New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
11
posted 1 month ago by BlackPillBot on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
RoulerBleu on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
The allowed building zone per lot was made to prevent houses from basically touching like that. The neighbour was not authorized to build this close.

The neighbour's plan, or construction crew, ignored the legal building zone, and the neighbour asked the council for a "relaxation", which was granted.

It should not have been granted. This is a hazard in multiple way.

Dangerous to do any maintenance between the buildings and a fire hazard.

Of course all of this would have been avoided by the developper not making ridiculously tiny lots to min-max his profits.
CharcoalWyrm on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> This is a hazard in multiple way.

> Dangerous to do any maintenance between the buildings and a fire hazard.

Like a duplex or a townhome?
Toast message