New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
11
Almost 400k for these “living” conditions. (youtu.be)
posted 1 month ago by BlackPillBot on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror )
10 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You must log in or sign up to comment
10 comments:
7
CharcoalWyrm on scored.co
1 month ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 2 children
So they bought a house constructed right next to the property line and are shocked when the other house is also built right next to the same property line?
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Yup. Someone called their bluff.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
RoulerBleu on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
The allowed building zone per lot was made to prevent houses from basically touching like that. The neighbour was not authorized to build this close.

The neighbour's plan, or construction crew, ignored the legal building zone, and the neighbour asked the council for a "relaxation", which was granted.

It should not have been granted. This is a hazard in multiple way.

Dangerous to do any maintenance between the buildings and a fire hazard.

Of course all of this would have been avoided by the developper not making ridiculously tiny lots to min-max his profits.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
CharcoalWyrm on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> This is a hazard in multiple way.

> Dangerous to do any maintenance between the buildings and a fire hazard.

Like a duplex or a townhome?
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
3
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Seriously, I would have been cutting all those 2x4s as they were lining them up along the side of my house. They would have never finished construction once I knew they were seriously trying to pull that shit.

I’d bet my life it’s going to end up being a rental.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
4
KyleIsThisTall on scored.co
1 month ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Worse, an indian.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Why not both? Hehe
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
CanticleFlugelhorn on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
At that you might as well have a condo. Are there even windows between the two? How would you go about painting, cleaning or maintaining the wall between?
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I know right?
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
deleted 1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message