New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
It may as well be antiracism, since it's essentially the same as all the other liberal excuses to divert blame away from blacks.

Blame the owners, like an actual racist.

There was a recent video of some faggot talking to Howard Jew about pitbulls and he mentioned hatred for the breed is "dog racism", but I'm sure none of you watched to the end when that fag made a good point about how "thugs are attracted to the breed".

And yes, the breed is less aggressive than chihuahuas. The dog's behavior is absolutely related to their owner's, comparing dog breeds to races and blaming the breed over the owner is falling into the medja trap of blaming blacks exclusively for their culture and ignoring their *owners* (cuz for example they didn't create crack or gangster rap thenselves).

Typical pitbull attack is one of two scenarios:

1. Mudshark adopts a stray and takes pictures of it "cuddling" with her mulatto baby because she's addicted to social medja. And then the dog smells a meal.

2. Pitbull gets loose in the ghetto and mauls a black kid.

These are 99% of pitbull attacks. They are in the ghetto or they are stray found in the ghetto adopted by irresponsible people who don't know how to properly train them.

You want to cull pitbulls, when they almost exclusively attack blacks in the ghetto, and you think you're racist? You're not racist, you're an antiracist protecting blacks, both physically from their natural predator and politically from the blame of being the exclusive cause of the problem.

You want to blame the breed and not the dogfighting rings that mistrain the breed into violent beasts? You're just a libtard making excusing for blacks. Blame the owners like a real racist. Your *dog racism* is cringe and gay.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
BlackPillBot on scored.co
15 hours ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
This comparison of an Inanimate object/tool that you have 100% control over if you so choose, versus an animal you can never truly have 100% control over, no matter how much you think you do, will always be silly, and borderline retarded IMHO. There are plenty of examples of loving relatively responsible middle class, and higher white owners who take very good care of the nigbull, and treat it the very same way they would treat any other dog breed they loved, only for it to eat them, and/or their loved one.

Now, if you want to argue it’s because of how they were bred, and you can’t treat them like any other breed, I think this is where we can agree, but it also proves, and solidifies my point. Same goes for niggers. What’s the point in having a dog for 99% of the population if you have to worry about it going full landshark at any given moment, and/or you have to lock it up anytime you have friends, and family come over?
Toast message