New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
It may as well be antiracism, since it's essentially the same as all the other liberal excuses to divert blame away from blacks.

Blame the owners, like an actual racist.

There was a recent video of some faggot talking to Howard Jew about pitbulls and he mentioned hatred for the breed is "dog racism", but I'm sure none of you watched to the end when that fag made a good point about how "thugs are attracted to the breed".

And yes, the breed is less aggressive than chihuahuas. The dog's behavior is absolutely related to their owner's, comparing dog breeds to races and blaming the breed over the owner is falling into the medja trap of blaming blacks exclusively for their culture and ignoring their *owners* (cuz for example they didn't create crack or gangster rap thenselves).

Typical pitbull attack is one of two scenarios:

1. Mudshark adopts a stray and takes pictures of it "cuddling" with her mulatto baby because she's addicted to social medja. And then the dog smells a meal.

2. Pitbull gets loose in the ghetto and mauls a black kid.

These are 99% of pitbull attacks. They are in the ghetto or they are stray found in the ghetto adopted by irresponsible people who don't know how to properly train them.

You want to cull pitbulls, when they almost exclusively attack blacks in the ghetto, and you think you're racist? You're not racist, you're an antiracist protecting blacks, both physically from their natural predator and politically from the blame of being the exclusive cause of the problem.

You want to blame the breed and not the dogfighting rings that mistrain the breed into violent beasts? You're just a libtard making excusing for blacks. Blame the owners like a real racist. Your *dog racism* is cringe and gay.
You must log in or sign up to comment
19 comments:
13
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
20 hours ago 13 points (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror ) 2 children
i'd blame both

the owner for being a libtard/nigger who owns a Nigbull

and the Nigbull for being a canine nigger
BlackPillBot on scored.co
17 hours ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Exactly, but “libtards” of all races think they can fix anything with enough “love”, and virtue signaling, including niggers, and niggers are just retarded, and shouldn’t ever have domain over anything even their own children especially in western white nations.
CulturalSeasoning on scored.co
20 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
That's cringe and gay. Blame the nigger exclusively. The animal has no autonomy.

Blame the niggers, not for owning dogs, but for mistraining them.

Any blame you put on the dog is blame taken away from the niggers who run dogfighting rings in their basement. That is libtard-level cringe.
11
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
20 hours ago 11 points (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror ) 1 child
Do you realize why they call pitbulls PITbulls?

they used them exclusively for fighting other dogs for money betting, the whole specie is cursed (much like niggers, who were bred to Do Sauron's work)
CulturalSeasoning on scored.co
20 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
So you know the history. You know they are mistrained to fight and that's why they attack. Yet you still disregard the human factor.

Do you really think that we make a monster whenever we breed a bulldog with a terrier? That's retarded. Any dog can be properly trained unless they have been abused beyond repair.

And even if you are too stubborn to see that reality, being anti pitbull is still the pro-black stance. Blacks are their victims. Blacks are to blame for abusing them. Being politically antipitbull is a way to appease blacks and there is no other way I see it.
SicilianOmega on scored.co
16 hours ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
They aren't just trained to attack, they are *bred* for it. The breeding process that created them was to have dogs fight to the death, and then breed the survivors, and then have the pups fight to the death when they grew up, and breed *those* survivors, for about 20 generations.
CulturalSeasoning on scored.co
12 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Good point but isn't that kinda how all canines bred naturally for millions of years?
BlackPillBot on scored.co
17 hours ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
Two things, can be true at once. Just like niggers are genetically awful, and can, and often do, become extremely violent with little to no warning signs over absolutely nothing while causing an extreme amount of damage in a short amount of time just like nigbulls. We all know that their kike owners are POS that use them as biowpeons of destruction. It doesn’t change the fact that they’re genetically predisposed to being way more trouble than they’re worth other than in some very very niche circumstances that idiots would ague for, that in the end aren’t net positives overall, and can be accomplished just as good, IF NOT BETTER, by another breed without all the pitfalls, and dangers associated with them.

“And yes, the breed is less aggressive than chihuahuas.”

🤣

This is such an extreme low IQ take, that I almost didn’t even reply to it.

-There is “aggression”. Can be all kinds of different things with nothing physical ever taking place.

-There is nipping where just the front of the jaw/mouth opens slightly, and bites down followed by an immediate release. This is almost always out of fear, and of defensive nature used as a more stern warning after other signs have been ignored.

-There is full on biting where the whole mouth is opened, and the dog bites down, and then lets go within a few seconds(under 5) AT MOST either own it’s own, or due to fear of its owners commands, and/or others getting involved. The main point here is that the dog can usually be corrected, and stopped by just commands, or at most physically grabbing, and/or hitting it with fists alone. These type can go either way depending on the situation. They can be both offensive, and defensive attacks.

-Last but not least, there are what I consider full on attacks where the dog fully bites, latches own, and holds on for over five seconds shaking, and dragging its victim, and captor to try to do is much damage as possible often times refusing to let go until it kills said victim, or takes extreme physical damage from an outside third party source. 99% of these are offensive attacks.

The last two types of attacks are overwhelmingly, and disproportionately committed by nigbulls with the last type of attack I described being almost exclusively nigbulls. The scariest part about said attacks is that they often come with no real warning from said nigbulls. Shit, its worse than that. Often times the nigbull will actually be playful, and wag its tail in what is usually a playful, and POSITIVE interaction manner in any other breed only to attack in the very same moment.

You can keep ignoring the reality of what I typed above, but it’s not going to change it, and there are millions of videos from all around the globe now showing what the breed is all about, and how dangerous they are even when raised from an 8 week old puppy in an extremely loving, and attentive home.

“The dog's behavior is absolutely related to their owner's, comparing dog breeds to races and blaming the breed over the owner is falling into the medja trap of blaming blacks exclusively for their culture and ignoring their owners (cuz for example they didn't create crack or gangster rap thenselves).”

Either I’m really fucking tired right now, or ☝🏻this shit☝🏻is nigger logic, and doesn’t make sense. It’s contradictory within itself.

🤷🏼‍♂️???

LoveYourFolk on scored.co
16 hours ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Just cuz nigs like nig dogs and get the majority of the inevitable results doesn't mean they're not nigger dogs. Some bull dogs are not niggers, but pit bulls should be exterminated imo. I got bit by one when I was a kid, and its the only dog that ever bit me and I didn't do shit to him. Dogs usually love me. Fuck pit bulls
CulturalSeasoning on scored.co
12 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
It's not their fault. Not saying that they aren't shitty dogs, maybe they're good for some circumstances as a guard dog, just saying that it's not their fault.
HerrBBQ on scored.co
16 hours ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Hey everyone look! A retard!
CulturalSeasoning on scored.co
12 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Derp
DrySharkPussy on scored.co
15 hours ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
I'll give you that "1%". My buddy (White) had one that I had been around and dogsat for since he was a puppy, he'd lay on my chest and anyone that got near he'd viciously bear his teeth and growl at and was very protective of me and I wasn'teven his owner. Overall I thought he was "different" than the rest as all evidence up until that point had supported this theory. Then one time I was dogsitting him and was about to walk into another room and forgot something so I turned around now knowing he was on the sofa behind me and my hand hit him on the side of his snout. Not hard just, the back of a hand hitting something with just the force you could imagine a limp hand could hit with 12" of centrifugal motion. Anyway, a switch flipped and I have never actually been scared of a dog in my life until that point. I tried to step closer and "apologize" and he only got more pissed. I actually grabbed my dog and just left my apartment for a walk. When I came back he was happy as could be like nothing happened. I never let him sleep in bed with me again after that.
CulturalSeasoning on scored.co
12 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
This dog was well trained since a little puppy? He wasn't a rescue?
DrySharkPussy on scored.co
1 hour ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Yup. Since 8 or so weeks and well trained hence why I was swaying thr other way with my opinion until it snapped.
CulturalSeasoning on scored.co
20 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
> but the stats say...

Yeah and the stats also say that handguns are the most dangerous firearm

You know that's not true and you know the only reason stats say that is because blacks use them.

It's the same for pitbulls.
BlackPillBot on scored.co
17 hours ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
This comparison of an Inanimate object/tool that you have 100% control over if you so choose, versus an animal you can never truly have 100% control over, no matter how much you think you do, will always be silly, and borderline retarded IMHO. There are plenty of examples of loving relatively responsible middle class, and higher white owners who take very good care of the nigbull, and treat it the very same way they would treat any other dog breed they loved, only for it to eat them, and/or their loved one.

Now, if you want to argue it’s because of how they were bred, and you can’t treat them like any other breed, I think this is where we can agree, but it also proves, and solidifies my point. Same goes for niggers. What’s the point in having a dog for 99% of the population if you have to worry about it going full landshark at any given moment, and/or you have to lock it up anytime you have friends, and family come over?
LGBTQIAIDS on scored.co
10 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Whatever that yid was whinging about that did the rounds on X to set off this topic is *easily* more retarded than race denialism.

Why? Most people alive today have been convinced that race doesn't exist. *Nobody* has been convinced that breeds do not exist among dogs, excluding that kike and whoever thinks that he is right.

Imagine being a dog breed denialist. Yet that's effectively what this is: race denialism extrapolated to dogs, resulting in the ludicrous, false claim that every dog is essentially equal and that the idea that one breed of dog is somehow in its nature more violent than another is simply overgeneralization and what we might call 'breed-ism', analogous to racism.

'Hey, you, you little soycialist, I'm a Great Dane supremacist, and I discriminate against chihuahuas. What are you going to do about it, you little soycialist faggot?'

'I'll have you know that I'm a committed anti-breedist and an avowed opponent of discrimination in all its forms! Your anti-chihuahua breedism is completely and utterly unacceptable! I'm part of Anti-Breedist Action! We know that you secretly want to gas six million chihuahuas, you dirty chihuahua-phobe! No room for breedism! This is an Anti-Breedist Zone! All Breedists Are Bastards! ABAB! Chihuahua Lives Matter!'

Types are divisible into sub-types: people who get het up about all of these '-isms' and '-phobias', for whom the world is perpetually divided into top dogs and underdogs, are all loser pieces of garbage. They all think that if a perceived oppressor would just stop withholding *something* that is supposedly kept from them, that their garbage lives and the lives of other garbage would somehow improve. It's all just a coping mechanism. 'My life is only contingently bad because I'm oppressed, but the true me is good. I would have all this power, wealth, and success if it wasn't for the oppressor!'

These people say that they hate the 'oppressor'. That is only superficially true. Actually, the idea of being oppressed is psychologically *beneficial* to these people, because it gives them an immediate excuse for each and every one of their myriad failings. It is also cognitively simple, requiring no great intelligence to comprehend or communicate. That is why they will *never* let go of this idea. They are the professionally oppressed, just like Obama was once labelled a 'professional nigger' by some groid comedian. It is like their drug of choice. 'If I am not oppressed... to whom then can blame be shifted? Don't I have to accept that blame belongs to me, something which hurts, something which I desperately wish to avoid? No, I can't accept that. So I am oppressed.'

No, there is no oppressor withholding anything from these people. What is this 'bourgeoisie', without whom you would supposedly live in material super-abundance? What is this 'patriarchy'? What are all of these supposed 'systems' from which emanate systemic this and systemic that? By claiming that you are oppressed without any oppressive agents, only oppressive structures, your oppression becomes unfalsifiable!

The self-styled oppressed are simply the detritus of humanity positivizing themselves, declaring themselves good. The detritus of humanity, possessing only immutably bad natures, ever immersing themselves in falsehoods, ever reaping the consequences of bad decisions. But accepting that one is nothing more than detritus is displeasing, to say the least, hence all their fantasies about how they have a true inner goodness, true inner talents, etc., all of which would radiate outwards and manifest themselves in all kinds of achievements and successes were it not for the power of an oppressor preventing that from happening.
CulturalSeasoning on scored.co
20 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
They're not *niggerdogs*, they are nigger's dogs.
removed 5 minutes ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Toast message