Some y'all know me. You know I'm no fan of Christianity, and that I consider it to be a jewish backdoor into functioning White societies, and an agent of popular passivity. Oh, and your epistemology is totally fucked.
Well that hasn't changed.
But I can't deny it: I'd rather live in a Christian country than any other flavor of NPC programming.
NPCs/normies have no moral compass. Zero. Zilch. They can't tell up from down or truth from fiction. This is true of both the Christian normie and the liberal normie. Because their own brains are immature, they both rely on authority and consensus, they just trust different authorities and rub elbows with different zealots.
Conversion (in either direction) pops out the old NPC chip and pops in the new one. But they have extremely different behavior profiles. Secularized normies are degenerates. Christianized normies are like a Norman Rockwell painting by comparison. They're still sinful and fat and selfish and unreasonable and rude, but *at least they try* to hold themselves to some standards of behavior. Liberal normies don't. They try to satisfy their impulses. They have the brain of a normie with the heart of a nigger. Tragic.
You can't avoid cultural normie programming. Every society has to do it, because EVERYONE goes through the normie phase before achieving sentience. White kids and preteens are almost all normies - they understand "naughty vs nice". But they can't discover it themselves. They have to be taught.
Only AFTER sentience is achieved, morality is possible without God. But that's not for normies. They never became sentient.
I'm completely willing to hear other suggestions for the best way to culturally program White normies, but I don't see a better one anywhere.
But the Founders were too liberal in their suffrage, and it led to universal suffrage, which is ~anarchy. So we have to guard the vote against normies even more than they did. To protect freedom. Because freedom has a pinnacle, and if you keep pushing for "more freedom" after that, you end up with less freedom.
Christian feudalism keeps the peace, keeps the normies working, while the above-average bloodlines run the show and make approximately rational decisions. The nobility honors Jesus in public, but don't bring him up much in private. That's because the programming chip is for the peasants.
Can I be a White-Christian nationalist while not being a Christian?
I'm pretty sure that's what Jefferson was.
I disbelieve Christianity on every level, though of course, there are many useful nuggets of truth and wisdom within. Rather than myself falling short of Biblical standards, Biblical standards fall short of mine. It's not moral enough for me.
I didn't leave the church because I wanted to sin, nor because I lost faith in God. I left because other Christians disgusted me with their bad attitudes and behavior. I see now, I was overly idealistic.
I attack Christianity for the harmful consequences of its beliefs, but I'm inclined to cut it a bit nore slack than before. I agree that its moral standards create MUCH MORE functional societies than Hinduism, or Islam, or wokism, and it's NOT just a race thing. It's just MOSTLY a race thing. 80/20 nature/nurture. The 20% still matters a lot.
All morality, at its root, in every social species, is about sexual reproduction. They become moral accidentally, to optimize birth rates over longer time periods and more generations. That's why raping a White woman is wrong, but raping a negress is not.
Blacks and White people have very different "perfect paths" on how to make children and grandchildren in perpetuity.
Optimizing sexual reproduction for the next 7 generations (with no tech) is indistinguishable from peak morality. Happy, healthy, wholesome people have the most great grandkids.
However, if we go the birthtech route, eventually our collective moral framework will adapt to fit that, because morality is downstream from reproduction.