Some y'all know me. You know I'm no fan of Christianity, and that I consider it to be a jewish backdoor into functioning White societies, and an agent of popular passivity. Oh, and your epistemology is totally fucked.
Well that hasn't changed.
But I can't deny it: I'd rather live in a Christian country than any other flavor of NPC programming.
NPCs/normies have no moral compass. Zero. Zilch. They can't tell up from down or truth from fiction. This is true of both the Christian normie and the liberal normie. Because their own brains are immature, they both rely on authority and consensus, they just trust different authorities and rub elbows with different zealots.
Conversion (in either direction) pops out the old NPC chip and pops in the new one. But they have extremely different behavior profiles. Secularized normies are degenerates. Christianized normies are like a Norman Rockwell painting by comparison. They're still sinful and fat and selfish and unreasonable and rude, but *at least they try* to hold themselves to some standards of behavior. Liberal normies don't. They try to satisfy their impulses. They have the brain of a normie with the heart of a nigger. Tragic.
You can't avoid cultural normie programming. Every society has to do it, because EVERYONE goes through the normie phase before achieving sentience. White kids and preteens are almost all normies - they understand "naughty vs nice". But they can't discover it themselves. They have to be taught.
Only AFTER sentience is achieved, morality is possible without God. But that's not for normies. They never became sentient.
I'm completely willing to hear other suggestions for the best way to culturally program White normies, but I don't see a better one anywhere.
But the Founders were too liberal in their suffrage, and it led to universal suffrage, which is ~anarchy. So we have to guard the vote against normies even more than they did. To protect freedom. Because freedom has a pinnacle, and if you keep pushing for "more freedom" after that, you end up with less freedom.
Christian feudalism keeps the peace, keeps the normies working, while the above-average bloodlines run the show and make approximately rational decisions. The nobility honors Jesus in public, but don't bring him up much in private. That's because the programming chip is for the peasants.
Can I be a White-Christian nationalist while not being a Christian?
I'm pretty sure that's what Jefferson was.
The Bible is essentially a how to manual to create civilization. If followed correctly it will create a patriarchal society. Most people are incapable of governing themselves thus we've always forced rules upon them. The Christian norms are the ones that work.
What did you just experience? I'm not the only one that will be curious.
But don't get me wrong. The churchgoers in question, like almost all Christians, are deep into liberal moral presuppositions. For example, moms sending their kids to daycare at <15 months so they can get back to working. Those monsters.
I can tolerate this church because AT LEAST they keep women out of their leadership. For me, that's the absolute bare minimum.
Furthermore, it's not like the secular folks were raging liberals or anything. It's a very conservative town. Someone put a trans-hole flag in a window in June, and in a few days someone else threw a rock through their window.
I didn't realize teaching kids to "do good, not evil" was so wrapped up with religion. I thought that was basic human shit. Not so for the peasants!
But it is basic human stuff, past a certain IQ+maturity threshold.
Signs you've graduated from NPCdom:
1. Immediately grasping generalizations (instead of saying NAXALT)
2. Capable of understanding complex, interacting rulesets (such as M:tG or D&D)
3. Showing more interest in the evidence than in who presented it
4. Seeking consensus through truth, instead of just seeking consensus
5. Capacity for objectivity
For a very long time I have been involved with some groups focusing on building our own white communities. I am an advocate for a unified binding religion to use as a standard for morality. For it is not enough just to be white skinned. A white skinned degenerate does not help your community. Thus I advocate Christianity, even to the non believers. The reason for this is it becomes the common backdrop for everyone. Every action is checked against a listed of approved norms. If it is not approved, then it must be bad. Simply morality. Logic applied correctly.
Successful religions *absolutely must* advocate for certain positions, such as:
"Have lots of kids" and
"Shut up and obey God('s rules)"
It's a necessary layer of society, because the majority of "adults" are just old. Mentally, they're still children.
As I said, I believe Christianity is the tool for the job. It's imperfect, but it gets so many things right, and it's already popular.
*Most* atheists are rational adults, not old children. But because they don't understand cognition tiers, they blame religion for locking people into normie thinking. Their understanding of cause and effect re:normies+religion is just incorrect. They are usually also very bitter about having *completely believed* something that they later realized was a lie - same thing that happens when you realize the Holocaust wasn't real.
So it's no surprise atheists win debates, because the average atheist has critical thinking, and the average Christian does not. But winning a debate is different than understanding the truth.
The closest I've ever been to "atheist" was as a pantheist, but then God showed up and showed me his personality.