CONSOOM The Right Belief System
(media.scored.co)
>if you don't accept the constant propaganda you're wrong
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
7 comments:
20
18 hours ago
20 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+20Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
9 hours ago
2 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+2Score on mirror
)
Basically if you don’t accept Judaism as your religion, while hating yourself, worshiping nons, and sodomy, you should KYS.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0 understanding of cultural currents. By that logic, if this redditor were transported back to Germany in the 1930s, he would either have the wrong beliefs and be completely immoral (by his own standards, not by the standards of the time and/or place) or he would agree with every bit of it because the movies say it's correct.
Let's extrapolate further. What if he got transported to a cannibal tribe? Well, everyone else is going to war and eating their captives after the victory... so it must be alright. He would be wrong because he views murder and cannibalism as wrong, but all of the culture that surrounds him says it's okay.
Or, let's say that he is transported to Israel while believing that child sacrifice and shooting innocent people is wrong.
Does this take into account what is/is not considered moral depending on where you are? No, it just projects modern weimar american "moral" values onto everything. By his own admittance, you can call this redditor a racist, because certainly the cannibal tribe in fiji, the warlord in africa, and the sharia courts in Saudi arabia have differing views on morality. And being racist is the most immoral thing you can be, shame on you, redditor.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Let's extrapolate further. What if he got transported to a cannibal tribe? Well, everyone else is going to war and eating their captives after the victory... so it must be alright. He would be wrong because he views murder and cannibalism as wrong, but all of the culture that surrounds him says it's okay.
Or, let's say that he is transported to Israel while believing that child sacrifice and shooting innocent people is wrong.
Does this take into account what is/is not considered moral depending on where you are? No, it just projects modern weimar american "moral" values onto everything. By his own admittance, you can call this redditor a racist, because certainly the cannibal tribe in fiji, the warlord in africa, and the sharia courts in Saudi arabia have differing views on morality. And being racist is the most immoral thing you can be, shame on you, redditor.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
It fundamentally boils down to the basic argument about moral systems.
1. You believe in moral absolutism, in which you draw the lines at what is good and bad (aka unethical up to criminal). Religion does provide such foundation.
2. You have a moral progressivism stance in which you believe humanity progresses their moral system in a way where eventually everybody loves faggotry and feminism and considers racism bad.
3. You believe in moral relativism, meaning you see morality subject to any given time and culture.
In the latter there is a flaw though. While leftists believe because every culture has its own moral system, everyone is somehow valid. But the more rational stance is to accept that every culture has different moral systems, thus your own culture has one which you should follow, and you should oppose other moral systems.
I personally believe that there are varying moral systems, but that actually it doesn't matter much. Niggers are going to nigger, kikes are going to kike, pajeets are going to scam. People in general just avoid conflict and confrontations, and do not have brownoid aggression levels. It's moreso genetic and environmental rather than a matter of conviction.
Niggers for example aren't aggressive and lack impulse control because they somehow have false convictions. It's genetic there too.
1. You believe in moral absolutism, in which you draw the lines at what is good and bad (aka unethical up to criminal). Religion does provide such foundation.
2. You have a moral progressivism stance in which you believe humanity progresses their moral system in a way where eventually everybody loves faggotry and feminism and considers racism bad.
3. You believe in moral relativism, meaning you see morality subject to any given time and culture.
In the latter there is a flaw though. While leftists believe because every culture has its own moral system, everyone is somehow valid. But the more rational stance is to accept that every culture has different moral systems, thus your own culture has one which you should follow, and you should oppose other moral systems.
I personally believe that there are varying moral systems, but that actually it doesn't matter much. Niggers are going to nigger, kikes are going to kike, pajeets are going to scam. People in general just avoid conflict and confrontations, and do not have brownoid aggression levels. It's moreso genetic and environmental rather than a matter of conviction.
Niggers for example aren't aggressive and lack impulse control because they somehow have false convictions. It's genetic there too.
>because some jew writers, jew directors, and jew production crews say you are wrong, you may be wrong
Thats how I read that
Thats how I read that
Toast message