Consume Product

It fundamentally boils down to the basic argument about moral systems.

1. You believe in moral absolutism, in which you draw the lines at what is good and bad (aka unethical up to criminal). Religion does provide such foundation.
2. You have a moral progressivism stance in which you believe humanity progresses their moral system in a way where eventually everybody loves faggotry and feminism and considers racism bad.
3. You believe in moral relativism, meaning you see morality subject to any given time and culture.

In the latter there is a flaw though. While leftists believe because every culture has its own moral system, everyone is somehow valid. But the more rational stance is to accept that every culture has different moral systems, thus your own culture has one which you should follow, and you should oppose other moral systems.

I personally believe that there are varying moral systems, but that actually it doesn't matter much. Niggers are going to nigger, kikes are going to kike, pajeets are going to scam. People in general just avoid conflict and confrontations, and do not have brownoid aggression levels. It's moreso genetic and environmental rather than a matter of conviction.

Niggers for example aren't aggressive and lack impulse control because they somehow have false convictions. It's genetic there too.