New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
24
posted 12 hours ago by RealWildRanter on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +24Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
whatlike_withacloth on scored.co
7 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>Explain

None of that requires an explanation. The modern jews aren't the Ancient Israelites, everyone who has the slightest consciousness about it knows that. They were scattered to the winds after the fall of Judah. That doesn't suggest in the slightest that they're fucking Norse Viking stock or some shit, nor do any of those screenshots you've posted. "We wuz Egyptians" so now it's Whites (Egyptians) enslaving Whites (Israelites)?

Genetically, the entire area of the Middle East is non-White going back millennia. But again, you haven't really defined what you mean by "White," so we're at a bit of a loss there. Or is Bathsheba a traditional White European stock name. Absilom? Adonijah? Ithream? Eglah? Maacah?

I don't follow the pope unless he's speaking from the Chair, in which case I still take it with a grain of salt because even Peter was wrong sometimes. But I also believe that faith looks like something (you will know them by their fruits), so one isn't saved through faith alone, at least not through a simple declaration, but the faith is manifest in their lives. So faith and works are inseparable. But I'm digressing.

What you've done is reached a conclusion, and you're backfilling the evidence, which leads to you ignoring the overwhelming evidence against your position. If you follow the evidence, all the historical sources and not just your cherry picked ones, you'll see that the Aryan purity you've foisted upon the Ancient Israelites is absurd.

But maybe not, because you still haven't really defined "White." Now I think you're just engagement farming.
genesisSOC on scored.co
6 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
https://www.thinkoutsidethebeast.com/100-proofs-that-the-israelites-were-white-people/\
Just one of many that prove you wrong.
>Genetically, the entire area of the Middle East is non-White going back millennia.

Only after the satyrs invaded when we left it, just like the Bible said would happen exactly.
>because you still haven't really defined "White."

White is a descendant of Adam, whom God made. Whites don't have non-White babies. Therefore, God did not make non-Whites. Non-Whites come from Cain, Esau, Ishmael and other Adamites mixing with the fallen angel demons out in the world after God created Adam. They do not come from God. How much longer are you going to be a coincidence theorist when literally all anthropological, biblical and DNA evidence is against you? Your only argument is "because jews told me so."
whatlike_withacloth on scored.co
6 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>Your only argument is "because jews told me so."

Ah, there it is. "Anything that disagrees with me was written by jews" while ignoring that much of the stuff that *does* agree with you was *also* written by jews.

I'm remembering our conversations before and why I've told myself not to engage you - you aren't coherent. Like here:

>White is a descendant of Adam, whom God made. Whites don't have non-White babies

Okay, would LOVE to see the genetic profile of Adam. Let me know when you find him to isolate his DNA.

>Non-Whites come from Cain

Hmm... Whites don't have non-White babies, but Cain, firstborn of the OG Whites Adam and Eve, fathered non-White babies... So he must've been non-White. But he was born of the OG Whites, and Whites don't have non-White babies, so he must've been White. But he had non-White babies, and Whites don't have non-White babies, so he must've been non-White.

See? With that loop running in your head, no wonder you can't think straight. You should reevaluate the line of thinking that led you to that loop and correct it such that the logical fallacy doesn't exist. Or not, your life. I'll do better to exchange ideas with serious people.

It's not that I'm not open to your ideas, it's just that they make no sense. Kinda like trans - your worldview collapses in upon itself with the slightest logic check, let alone a reality check.
genesisSOC on scored.co
6 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>"Anything that disagrees with me was written by jews" while ignoring that much of the stuff that does agree with you was also written by jews.

Another straw man, you concede the argument because you don't address any points.

>Okay, would LOVE to see the genetic profile of Adam

"The light skin colour of today's Europeans is primarily based on non-synonymous SNPs of the genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, the geographical origin of which is western Asia and the Near East [Eden]." - Prof. Carsten Carlberg & Andrea Hanel - Skin colour and vitamin D: An update, Experimental Dermatology Volume 29, Issue 9, p. 864- 875, September 2020 (DOI: 10.1111/exd. 14142)\
In addition to this, the very word "Adam" literally means in ancient unchanged Hebrew "to be White and ruddy, to blush in the face." If you try to say it means "man" somehow like jews claim today, then why does Dam mean blood red and Adamah mean red ground? It makes no sense.
> but Cain, firstborn of the OG Whites Adam and Eve, fathered non-White babies...

Cain was White. Esau was White. Ishmael was White. All the Adamites were White. They mixed with the other 200 fallen angel demons to create the non-Whites, because *they mixed*. You started this argument by claiming apocryphal but you haven't even read it, because all of this is exactly explained in Enoch. It's also referenced in Genesis 6. So either you think the apocryphal is fake and gay or you think God didn't create nons
Coronelington on scored.co
5 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
i dont know why im reading all this but im just gonna say that whatever genesissoc has in mind is the only way i can be consistent religiously, im not gonna get into semantics. you are doing a fine job doing that both of you
Toast message