You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
whatlike_withacloth on scored.co
6 hours ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
>Your only argument is "because jews told me so."
Ah, there it is. "Anything that disagrees with me was written by jews" while ignoring that much of the stuff that *does* agree with you was *also* written by jews.
I'm remembering our conversations before and why I've told myself not to engage you - you aren't coherent. Like here:
>White is a descendant of Adam, whom God made. Whites don't have non-White babies
Okay, would LOVE to see the genetic profile of Adam. Let me know when you find him to isolate his DNA.
>Non-Whites come from Cain
Hmm... Whites don't have non-White babies, but Cain, firstborn of the OG Whites Adam and Eve, fathered non-White babies... So he must've been non-White. But he was born of the OG Whites, and Whites don't have non-White babies, so he must've been White. But he had non-White babies, and Whites don't have non-White babies, so he must've been non-White.
See? With that loop running in your head, no wonder you can't think straight. You should reevaluate the line of thinking that led you to that loop and correct it such that the logical fallacy doesn't exist. Or not, your life. I'll do better to exchange ideas with serious people.
It's not that I'm not open to your ideas, it's just that they make no sense. Kinda like trans - your worldview collapses in upon itself with the slightest logic check, let alone a reality check.
>"Anything that disagrees with me was written by jews" while ignoring that much of the stuff that does agree with you was also written by jews.
Another straw man, you concede the argument because you don't address any points.
>Okay, would LOVE to see the genetic profile of Adam
"The light skin colour of today's Europeans is primarily based on non-synonymous SNPs of the genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, the geographical origin of which is western Asia and the Near East [Eden]." - Prof. Carsten Carlberg & Andrea Hanel - Skin colour and vitamin D: An update, Experimental Dermatology Volume 29, Issue 9, p. 864- 875, September 2020 (DOI: 10.1111/exd. 14142)\
In addition to this, the very word "Adam" literally means in ancient unchanged Hebrew "to be White and ruddy, to blush in the face." If you try to say it means "man" somehow like jews claim today, then why does Dam mean blood red and Adamah mean red ground? It makes no sense.
> but Cain, firstborn of the OG Whites Adam and Eve, fathered non-White babies...
Cain was White. Esau was White. Ishmael was White. All the Adamites were White. They mixed with the other 200 fallen angel demons to create the non-Whites, because *they mixed*. You started this argument by claiming apocryphal but you haven't even read it, because all of this is exactly explained in Enoch. It's also referenced in Genesis 6. So either you think the apocryphal is fake and gay or you think God didn't create nons
i dont know why im reading all this but im just gonna say that whatever genesissoc has in mind is the only way i can be consistent religiously, im not gonna get into semantics. you are doing a fine job doing that both of you
Ah, there it is. "Anything that disagrees with me was written by jews" while ignoring that much of the stuff that *does* agree with you was *also* written by jews.
I'm remembering our conversations before and why I've told myself not to engage you - you aren't coherent. Like here:
>White is a descendant of Adam, whom God made. Whites don't have non-White babies
Okay, would LOVE to see the genetic profile of Adam. Let me know when you find him to isolate his DNA.
>Non-Whites come from Cain
Hmm... Whites don't have non-White babies, but Cain, firstborn of the OG Whites Adam and Eve, fathered non-White babies... So he must've been non-White. But he was born of the OG Whites, and Whites don't have non-White babies, so he must've been White. But he had non-White babies, and Whites don't have non-White babies, so he must've been non-White.
See? With that loop running in your head, no wonder you can't think straight. You should reevaluate the line of thinking that led you to that loop and correct it such that the logical fallacy doesn't exist. Or not, your life. I'll do better to exchange ideas with serious people.
It's not that I'm not open to your ideas, it's just that they make no sense. Kinda like trans - your worldview collapses in upon itself with the slightest logic check, let alone a reality check.
Another straw man, you concede the argument because you don't address any points.
>Okay, would LOVE to see the genetic profile of Adam
"The light skin colour of today's Europeans is primarily based on non-synonymous SNPs of the genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, the geographical origin of which is western Asia and the Near East [Eden]." - Prof. Carsten Carlberg & Andrea Hanel - Skin colour and vitamin D: An update, Experimental Dermatology Volume 29, Issue 9, p. 864- 875, September 2020 (DOI: 10.1111/exd. 14142)\
In addition to this, the very word "Adam" literally means in ancient unchanged Hebrew "to be White and ruddy, to blush in the face." If you try to say it means "man" somehow like jews claim today, then why does Dam mean blood red and Adamah mean red ground? It makes no sense.
> but Cain, firstborn of the OG Whites Adam and Eve, fathered non-White babies...
Cain was White. Esau was White. Ishmael was White. All the Adamites were White. They mixed with the other 200 fallen angel demons to create the non-Whites, because *they mixed*. You started this argument by claiming apocryphal but you haven't even read it, because all of this is exactly explained in Enoch. It's also referenced in Genesis 6. So either you think the apocryphal is fake and gay or you think God didn't create nons