If you see a nigger with glasses like that, know that it will be 10x more uppity than the average basketball american
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
18 comments:
32
1 month ago
32 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+32Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
For all the retards out there, this is one of the "good blacks" or when your dumbass says "not all of them are bad", this nigger cunt is who you're referring to.
So, yes, it is all of them, they are all niggers and they all need to go.
So, yes, it is all of them, they are all niggers and they all need to go.
We are in a race war, though.
Do they think that if they make the glasses big enough it compensates for the 67 IQ?
In the Planet of the Apes (I cant remember if it was one of the sequels or the TV series) that takes place in the time after the apes ascended but before the humans devolved into feral animals, there was an attempt to coexist. But the apes were in charge, and one of the worst crimes a human could commit was telling an ape 'no'. This was illustrated during a scene in a school where a human was teaching apes how to read, and a gorilla in frustration began tearing pages out of the book. "NO!" cried the teacher, and he was arrested and brought before a tribunal.
> You are thinking of the 1973 film "Battle for the Planet of the Apes," which depicts an uneasy, segregated society where apes are in charge. The human is "Abe the Teacher," who was responsible for educating young apes. In the opening scene, a frustrated gorilla (General Aldo) rips pages out of a book. When Abe yells "No!", it creates a legal and societal dispute between the humans and apes.
in literally 100% of circumstances where i've been in public with my nieces/nephews/children and some black kids have been around, 100% of the black kids act like savages. we're talking that by the age of 8, they already know black kids are a genuine threat.
Of course it’s best for them to not have to live this way, but Its better for them to be around, SUPERVISED OF COURSE, little niglets 10, and under at an early age to give them the opportunity to learn just how much of a pain, and threat they actually are. The reason I say that age is because they’re still a relatively low threat of serious bodily injury to your kids at that age when supersized. It allows your child to watch their dynamics, and how exhausting they can be with the worst thing likely happening is some property theft/damage, and/or a physical confrontation with little to no serious damage before you step in.
These experiences will likely serve them well as they grow, and are forced to be around the truly dangerous ones between the ages of 12, and 45 on occasion. It’s blows my mind that we have to have these types of discussions, and employ these types of strategies just to live and protect our families.
These experiences will likely serve them well as they grow, and are forced to be around the truly dangerous ones between the ages of 12, and 45 on occasion. It’s blows my mind that we have to have these types of discussions, and employ these types of strategies just to live and protect our families.
Toast message