I will give you possible futures based on what will happen over the following years and decades. Note that these are predictions, so it's unclear what will happen, but there are still logical processes. Also there are unforeseeable events possible, but they are completely unpredictable. Covid is an example of something that basically comes out of nowhere (a damn lab leak).
Option 1: The current development continues, right-wing activity remains too small. This means the EU will continue to import 3rd world brownoids, they distribute them into every country in Europe, Britain becomes an even more tyrannical dystopia, the ratio of non-Whites increases in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand. While right-wing emergences occur, they are too late and too small. In 100 years the ratio of Whites is around ~1% of the world population, but that's the most optimistic view. In reality, countries that fall to brownoids will become extremely hostile towards Whites, and they will accelerate murdering us. Thanks to Democracy, brownoid-favoring parties will be in charge most of the time, and the most radical right-wing parties will want to cut down the massive funneling of money and resources from Whites to nons a tiny bit.
Option 2: Over the next years or decades, people get aware of the jewish problem enough to gain political power. But thanks to Democracy, the effects are quite mitigated and timid. Countries will seek to deport recent illegal migrants, which will have a process spanning years for all cases. Things improve slightly, stopping the trend of continuous decline. The jews will only be opposed to a lesser degree - only insofar it relates to israel. The outcome is still unchanged from option 1: In 100 years we are close to extinction.
Option 3: People realize that you cannot vote your way out of this, and it will be enough to start civil wars with their governments. It will be a time of conflicts across White countries, and the worse it got, the more heated the fights. Whites do not really win, as they stand against White ZOG armies who protect the system. It will be like Ukraine, where things continue to function in Kiev, ZOG agendas are pushed, but somehow men are sent to die in the war. The importation of brownoids continues, mass surveillance increases, but there are enclaves of people who reject it. It's a messy world, the lines are blurred, most people are interested in their luxuries continuing to function (heating, sanitation, electricity, internet, grocery shops). The resistance is not enough, but while the ZOG fraction gets inundated with brownoids, there will be White-only enclaves all over the place, and they aren't using excuses to keep it that way, they will be openly, proudly racist. In 100 years, Whites will be ~4% of the world population.
Option 4: Same as option 3, but the people turn overwhelmingly racist, notice, and win. The governments couldn't withstand the onslaught of people turning against them. Those who revolt also applied violence to a high degree, going after jews, traitors, brownoids with lethal means. The media screeched and crying, but they weren't spared either. The new government ended the 3rd world immigration project, they removed non-Whites (non-natives) from positions of finance, influence and power. Projects like "foreign aid" ended, the Climate Change agendas too, Covid was seen as a surge of tyranny they opposed, but weren't listened to. The goal was to restore a 100% ethnic homogeneity in all White countries. In fact, the goal was aligned across most countries, and as it lead to massive prosperity, it inspired other countries to follow the same path as well. All along the jews were the biggest resistance against it, and the population was inundated with the brownoids still in the country. Votes have been made to the populations, and the overwhelming outcome is that they wanted jews and brownoids gone at all costs - only a minority wanted more peaceful solutions, and even less wanted to do nothing. The governments followed this will, and engaged in diplomatic negotiations with countries to deport them there - but it failed. They did not want them back, so the only outcome was to put them into camps. From there on they either died, got executed or got deported - but no matter what, jew/brown -> camp. As it occurred, people also realized how irrational the holocaust was (aka fake), because this time it was a real extermination program, and it was nothing like that. Actually realistic procedures, not some gas chamber trickery, or electric swimming pools, or death masturbation machines, or overfed eagles and bears. In 100 years, Whites will be ~20% of the world population. Consider that ending feeding Africans will lead to mass starvation events, which will be highly appreciated by everyone involved.
Option 1: The current development continues, right-wing activity remains too small. This means the EU will continue to import 3rd world brownoids, they distribute them into every country in Europe, Britain becomes an even more tyrannical dystopia, the ratio of non-Whites increases in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand. While right-wing emergences occur, they are too late and too small. In 100 years the ratio of Whites is around ~1% of the world population, but that's the most optimistic view. In reality, countries that fall to brownoids will become extremely hostile towards Whites, and they will accelerate murdering us. Thanks to Democracy, brownoid-favoring parties will be in charge most of the time, and the most radical right-wing parties will want to cut down the massive funneling of money and resources from Whites to nons a tiny bit.
Option 2: Over the next years or decades, people get aware of the jewish problem enough to gain political power. But thanks to Democracy, the effects are quite mitigated and timid. Countries will seek to deport recent illegal migrants, which will have a process spanning years for all cases. Things improve slightly, stopping the trend of continuous decline. The jews will only be opposed to a lesser degree - only insofar it relates to israel. The outcome is still unchanged from option 1: In 100 years we are close to extinction.
Option 3: People realize that you cannot vote your way out of this, and it will be enough to start civil wars with their governments. It will be a time of conflicts across White countries, and the worse it got, the more heated the fights. Whites do not really win, as they stand against White ZOG armies who protect the system. It will be like Ukraine, where things continue to function in Kiev, ZOG agendas are pushed, but somehow men are sent to die in the war. The importation of brownoids continues, mass surveillance increases, but there are enclaves of people who reject it. It's a messy world, the lines are blurred, most people are interested in their luxuries continuing to function (heating, sanitation, electricity, internet, grocery shops). The resistance is not enough, but while the ZOG fraction gets inundated with brownoids, there will be White-only enclaves all over the place, and they aren't using excuses to keep it that way, they will be openly, proudly racist. In 100 years, Whites will be ~4% of the world population.
Option 4: Same as option 3, but the people turn overwhelmingly racist, notice, and win. The governments couldn't withstand the onslaught of people turning against them. Those who revolt also applied violence to a high degree, going after jews, traitors, brownoids with lethal means. The media screeched and crying, but they weren't spared either. The new government ended the 3rd world immigration project, they removed non-Whites (non-natives) from positions of finance, influence and power. Projects like "foreign aid" ended, the Climate Change agendas too, Covid was seen as a surge of tyranny they opposed, but weren't listened to. The goal was to restore a 100% ethnic homogeneity in all White countries. In fact, the goal was aligned across most countries, and as it lead to massive prosperity, it inspired other countries to follow the same path as well. All along the jews were the biggest resistance against it, and the population was inundated with the brownoids still in the country. Votes have been made to the populations, and the overwhelming outcome is that they wanted jews and brownoids gone at all costs - only a minority wanted more peaceful solutions, and even less wanted to do nothing. The governments followed this will, and engaged in diplomatic negotiations with countries to deport them there - but it failed. They did not want them back, so the only outcome was to put them into camps. From there on they either died, got executed or got deported - but no matter what, jew/brown -> camp. As it occurred, people also realized how irrational the holocaust was (aka fake), because this time it was a real extermination program, and it was nothing like that. Actually realistic procedures, not some gas chamber trickery, or electric swimming pools, or death masturbation machines, or overfed eagles and bears. In 100 years, Whites will be ~20% of the world population. Consider that ending feeding Africans will lead to mass starvation events, which will be highly appreciated by everyone involved.
New Zealand will probably be the first country to choose your option 1, since it has rapidly descended to 56% White according to its last census. I think that it is inevitable that some countries simply won't awaken in time to turn around the 'rising tide of "colour"'. The question is: How many? Another question is: Will the downfall of a country like New Zealand be the catalyst for a course correction elsewhere?
> Right-wing activity
If we're talking about a vaguely Right-Wing populism, that seems to have, from our enemy's view, 'infected' most of Western European civilization over the past decade. The cat is probably out of the bag at this point, so the only thing that they can hope for is to accelerate their aims, increase censorship, and try to ban and destroy political parties (e.g. the Greek state destroying Golden Dawn from top-down in Greece).
The proximate cause seemed to be: 1) The mainstreaming of France's National Rally, which moved it from an ethnonationalist party to a civic nationalist one. 2) The rise of Germany's liberal-conservative, civic nationalist AfD.
This then led to a sort of domino effect, with the rise of Vox (Spain) and Chega (Portugal), UKIP/Brexit/Reform (Britain), Meloni (Italy), and the Trump phenomenon all fitting in to varying degrees. Some of the latest developments include Restore vaguely outflanking Reform from the Right and the resurgence of a decades-old, once prominent political party, One Nation, in Australia.
Nevertheless, our enemies are still making progress eastward, defeating several of their enemies in Eastern Europe, such as PiS in Poland, and, as you know all too well, Fidesz in Hungary.
Whether this vague populism will lead to actual Far-Right politics or at least to explicitly pro-ethnoracial politics remains to be seen. It does seem like ethnoracial politics has the sort of upper hand in the sense of winning arguments: I notice obvious anti-ethnoracial politicians like Nigel Farage co-opting ethnoracialist talking points (e.g. using explicitly racial terms like 'White'), whereas they would have no need for that whatsoever if they were so confident that civic nationalism is correct and can win elections without compromise with ethnoracial politics.
> countries that fall to brownoids
Brazil, South Africa, and Zimbabwe serve as the best crystal balls to how these countries will look. Only clueless Whites think that these countries are just isolated incidents rather than the *future* if there is no course change. The only thing that separates us from having been the same as them for decades is the demographics.
Generally, the nons will just take over the mainstream Left party, create an environment that is hostile even to White Leftists and which essentially purges them, and govern through a fragile coalition united by anti-White animus and fear. You can already see this in the US Democratic Party: notice that the White Democrats like Biden and Clinton are all the old ones, whereas the young Democrats are mostly nons like Mamdani, AOC, and Ilhan Omar. Put simply, the Democratic Party has had its own 'Great Replacement' and few are even cognizant of it. It will become more and more difficult for Whites to climb the ranks of the Democratic Party.
At the moment, nons still think of the state as White, colonialist, etc. rather than theirs. Once loose coalitions of spiteful nons have consolidated control over the state, *that* is when the 'coloureds' will greater show their true colours.
> Kikes
Kike history has a strong cyclicality, going from acceptance to exclusion and back again. Obviously this cycle can only end one of two ways: total acceptance (i.e. kike power becomes so potent that the goyim are either eradicated or permanently powerless) or total rejection (i.e. kike eradication). Anything else - anything short of the conclusive, absolute victory of one side - simply continues the cycle.
Post-October 7, what we have is a noticeable increase in Leftist anti-Zionism; but this is, bizarrely, simply a feature of the same anti-White animus that many nons have. Jewish supremacy is White supremacy, Israel is the new Nazi Germany, Netanyahu is the new Hitler, and all that. That alone isn't really useful to us in any real way: it actually misinterprets what kikes do as a subset of what Whites do, which ultimately helps kikes by increasing anti-White animus instead of 'anti-Semitism'.
It is of course possible that some Leftist anti-Zionism can lead to genuine 'anti-Semitism'. However, it is just as possible that the kikes can come up with new mental junk (like Marxism, racism, and the Holocaust) that returns to mush the minds of people who might otherwise be awakening. They have proven adept at creating concepts that move the cycle back to the (re)acceptance stage by making a later generation of goyim - one largely ignorant of kikes - feel apologetic for what an earlier generation did. Content creators like Handsome Truth are obviously right when they accuse our White ancestors of being abject failures at solving the yiddish problem because of their reliance on the obviously failed method of expulsion (or expulsion of all those who do not adopt Christianity, e.g., in Spain with the conversos and in Britain).
In fact, it is this limited success of an earlier generation that leads to the failure of a later generation: by successfully expelling kikes, a later generation becomes too unaware of the threat that they pose, becomes duped by honey-mouthed kikes bearing gifts and displaying ostentatious wealth, begins to doubt the rightness of their ancestors' actions, and sets the ball rolling for their reacceptance.
Consider leaders, for instance, Spain's Zapatero, who apologize for their ancestors' expulsion of the kikes. (Zapatero himself has kike ancestry.) Just what experience do these people or anyone of their generation have with the kikes? Very little, their opinions of kikes are largely shaped by concepts like racism and the Holocaust. And what experience did their ancestors from the time have with the kikes? Far more than they do, nor were there any such ridiculous, mind-scrambling concepts that clouded their judgement of them. Knowledge of kikes leads one to exclude them; ignorance, to accept them. What grounds do late-modern people have to believe that they are right and their more knowledgeable ancestors wrong, particularly on this specific matter on which they know practically nothing beyond the sanitized image of the kike which the kike himself obviously propagates by means of his power?
> Africa
African social structures are rapidly deteriorating: the old Africans have a kind of stability whereas the young ones are like the Americanized ones: having keeds with multiple niggers, the fathers vanish like magicians, glorifying (c)rap music (e.g. the son of Liberian former warlord and president Charles Taylor was a rapper whose stage name was 'Bentman') and the grandparents are left taking care of the niglets (i.e. their own grandkids) while their daughter is still in school or spends all her time in nightclubs; high on 'Wonim Red' (tramadol), 'kush' (nitazenes), or other kinds of opioids; or prostituting. It doesn't matter whether it is Sierra Leone, South Africa, or Kenya, whether west, south, or east on the continent, it is happening around all the 'black' parts of Africa.
I think to myself: What will happen when the old Africans die off? Then nobody will have stability. The children of today's young niggers will not be able to palm off their own keeds onto their parents, because their parents are already dysfunctional or will already be incapacitated or dead by that time.
All of this leads to one conclusion: in the coming decades, Africa is going to disintegrate into mass chaos and death of proportions no man has ever seen, and if non-Rightist Whites and nons are still running things when this happens, all 'non-racist' White countries (and plenty of non-white countries) will be swarmed by hundreds of millions of fleeing niggers.
Hmm... it is indeed cyclical, but it's also about how much they've pulled the string, and how much it will rebound. In this case they've done it to an extreme measure over an extensive time - the rebound will be brutal. It won't be just a simple emigration, it will be filled with a lot of rage and hatred. If Hitler would have won, perhaps they could have continued their back-and-forth kikery forever, but this way there is a good chance the jewish problem will end once and for all.
> i.e. kike power becomes so potent that the goyim are either eradicated or permanently powerless
Also given that they are always in a minority position, they *need* to control populations through effectively illusion (like the illusion of power). So even if they win, and manage to mongrelize our countries, the brownoids would turn on them immediately. After Whites are gone, jews will be the next. There is no win-scenario for them - UNLESS the goal is some kind of limbo state as we have today and the past decades. They thrive while nobody is really bad off enough to revolt, but people must be worse off so that resources flow to them (parasitism simply requires that). So you are absolutely right with "anything short of the conclusive, absolute victory of one side - simply continues the cycle."
> Africa is going to disintegrate into mass chaos and death of proportions no man has ever seen
Maybe. But if Whites stop feeding them endlessly, the same would occur as well. Or even intensify that process - that would be a good outcome.
However, if Whites are still obsessed with being "anti-racist", then you are right, it would be a total disaster for us.
In other words, peaceful coexistence doesn't work well either way: high-IQ people always run the risk of waking up, and low-IQ people are too lawless and violent to make good slaves like those that religious kikes believe that the Talmud promises them. Since the kike is essentially a parasite in human form, having a world of his own wouldn't work for him either. It's a kind of triple-bind scenario, because if he 'wins' and has only low-IQ muttoids to deal with, they make a poor host to parasite off of.
Clarifying the Africa point, 'black' Africa is screwed either way. Cutting food imports would obviously trigger a massive problem virtually overnight. However, my own prediction is that that won't even really happen in any uniform way (it is highly unlikely that every food exporting country will simply turn against Africa, so African countries will simply hop around between sellers if some countries cut them off), and yet Africa will still collapse into mass chaos and death regardless. The problems on the ground there with drugs and the like are just too great.
And jews are hopelessly weak btw. The IDF is specialized in killing civilians. They have to compel the brownoids to use the stick against other brownoids. Once that is gone, there is nothing left - neither quantity nor quality.
> high-IQ people always run the risk of waking up
Yes, and that is the risk they have to take. In order to be good parasites, they need a functional country that has a high average IQ with positive work ethics, thus inevitably high-IQ people. But they are also the biggest source of danger to them. *Somehow* they have to funnel them into productive endeavors (which returns as wealth and luxury to them), and keep them away from positions of power and influence.
See, if I'd have some degree of wealth and reputation, I'd organize something. I have ideas, but they won't work if I'd have to fight my own kin. I'd have to work towards dissolving that, but that's the biggest barrier. I have no problem in eliminating non-Whites at all. Their desensitivity worked on me, they can reap what they've sowed.