New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I will give you possible futures based on what will happen over the following years and decades. Note that these are predictions, so it's unclear what will happen, but there are still logical processes. Also there are unforeseeable events possible, but they are completely unpredictable. Covid is an example of something that basically comes out of nowhere (a damn lab leak).

Option 1: The current development continues, right-wing activity remains too small. This means the EU will continue to import 3rd world brownoids, they distribute them into every country in Europe, Britain becomes an even more tyrannical dystopia, the ratio of non-Whites increases in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand. While right-wing emergences occur, they are too late and too small. In 100 years the ratio of Whites is around ~1% of the world population, but that's the most optimistic view. In reality, countries that fall to brownoids will become extremely hostile towards Whites, and they will accelerate murdering us. Thanks to Democracy, brownoid-favoring parties will be in charge most of the time, and the most radical right-wing parties will want to cut down the massive funneling of money and resources from Whites to nons a tiny bit.

Option 2: Over the next years or decades, people get aware of the jewish problem enough to gain political power. But thanks to Democracy, the effects are quite mitigated and timid. Countries will seek to deport recent illegal migrants, which will have a process spanning years for all cases. Things improve slightly, stopping the trend of continuous decline. The jews will only be opposed to a lesser degree - only insofar it relates to israel. The outcome is still unchanged from option 1: In 100 years we are close to extinction.

Option 3: People realize that you cannot vote your way out of this, and it will be enough to start civil wars with their governments. It will be a time of conflicts across White countries, and the worse it got, the more heated the fights. Whites do not really win, as they stand against White ZOG armies who protect the system. It will be like Ukraine, where things continue to function in Kiev, ZOG agendas are pushed, but somehow men are sent to die in the war. The importation of brownoids continues, mass surveillance increases, but there are enclaves of people who reject it. It's a messy world, the lines are blurred, most people are interested in their luxuries continuing to function (heating, sanitation, electricity, internet, grocery shops). The resistance is not enough, but while the ZOG fraction gets inundated with brownoids, there will be White-only enclaves all over the place, and they aren't using excuses to keep it that way, they will be openly, proudly racist. In 100 years, Whites will be ~4% of the world population.

Option 4: Same as option 3, but the people turn overwhelmingly racist, notice, and win. The governments couldn't withstand the onslaught of people turning against them. Those who revolt also applied violence to a high degree, going after jews, traitors, brownoids with lethal means. The media screeched and crying, but they weren't spared either. The new government ended the 3rd world immigration project, they removed non-Whites (non-natives) from positions of finance, influence and power. Projects like "foreign aid" ended, the Climate Change agendas too, Covid was seen as a surge of tyranny they opposed, but weren't listened to. The goal was to restore a 100% ethnic homogeneity in all White countries. In fact, the goal was aligned across most countries, and as it lead to massive prosperity, it inspired other countries to follow the same path as well. All along the jews were the biggest resistance against it, and the population was inundated with the brownoids still in the country. Votes have been made to the populations, and the overwhelming outcome is that they wanted jews and brownoids gone at all costs - only a minority wanted more peaceful solutions, and even less wanted to do nothing. The governments followed this will, and engaged in diplomatic negotiations with countries to deport them there - but it failed. They did not want them back, so the only outcome was to put them into camps. From there on they either died, got executed or got deported - but no matter what, jew/brown -> camp. As it occurred, people also realized how irrational the holocaust was (aka fake), because this time it was a real extermination program, and it was nothing like that. Actually realistic procedures, not some gas chamber trickery, or electric swimming pools, or death masturbation machines, or overfed eagles and bears. In 100 years, Whites will be ~20% of the world population. Consider that ending feeding Africans will lead to mass starvation events, which will be highly appreciated by everyone involved.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
LGBTQIAIDS on scored.co
5 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
We are finding plenty of agreement. And, yes, simply destroying the Whites and/or all high-IQ peoples wouldn't end the cycle simply because low-IQ muttoids are too lawless and can't really be controlled except through the stick (and the kikes are more of a manager, merchant type, not a warrior type) and can't tell the difference between yids and Whites.

In other words, peaceful coexistence doesn't work well either way: high-IQ people always run the risk of waking up, and low-IQ people are too lawless and violent to make good slaves like those that religious kikes believe that the Talmud promises them. Since the kike is essentially a parasite in human form, having a world of his own wouldn't work for him either. It's a kind of triple-bind scenario, because if he 'wins' and has only low-IQ muttoids to deal with, they make a poor host to parasite off of.

Clarifying the Africa point, 'black' Africa is screwed either way. Cutting food imports would obviously trigger a massive problem virtually overnight. However, my own prediction is that that won't even really happen in any uniform way (it is highly unlikely that every food exporting country will simply turn against Africa, so African countries will simply hop around between sellers if some countries cut them off), and yet Africa will still collapse into mass chaos and death regardless. The problems on the ground there with drugs and the like are just too great.
PurestEvil on scored.co
3 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> can't really be controlled except through the stick

And jews are hopelessly weak btw. The IDF is specialized in killing civilians. They have to compel the brownoids to use the stick against other brownoids. Once that is gone, there is nothing left - neither quantity nor quality.

> high-IQ people always run the risk of waking up

Yes, and that is the risk they have to take. In order to be good parasites, they need a functional country that has a high average IQ with positive work ethics, thus inevitably high-IQ people. But they are also the biggest source of danger to them. *Somehow* they have to funnel them into productive endeavors (which returns as wealth and luxury to them), and keep them away from positions of power and influence.

See, if I'd have some degree of wealth and reputation, I'd organize something. I have ideas, but they won't work if I'd have to fight my own kin. I'd have to work towards dissolving that, but that's the biggest barrier. I have no problem in eliminating non-Whites at all. Their desensitivity worked on me, they can reap what they've sowed.
Toast message