Why didn't Sikh "religious leaders" report Vikram to the police when he moved beyond the bounds of their religion? He had the knive(s) because of his religion, but he was, effectively, excommunicated and the people who did so said nothing.
They need to be held to account for their followers.
They need to be held to account for their followers.
I think that's a step too far. They'd rather kill, genocide, die and get genocided in the most brutal way than to admit that. Normally I'd say these terms are acceptable, but we are talking about a takeover from brownoids and kikes, turning Britain into some volatile hellscape that cannot be tolerated as a neighbor. It would become something like Hawaii.
Wrong