New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
posted 29 days ago by genesisSOC on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
genesisSOC on scored.co
27 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Yes. Because they all get exposed to the same toxin. There's literally no evidence of any "virus" ever provided, and all studies trying to prove "contagious disease" also failed, such as the "Spanish Flu" and "Measles" and "Polio" and more, all the way until jews outlawed doing more studies by calling it "unethical" due to them getting proved wrong all the time.\
It's also the same reason I don't get sick even though everyone in the house does. There is no "immune system," I'm just not a retard who gets flu shots or eats goyslop.
steele2 on scored.co
27 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>Because they all get exposed to the same toxin

How, when the family members each live different lifestyles, spend their time in different locations and eat different foods?

This is important, a critical part of your alternate theory that needs to be explained before I can take it seriously.

In the past, this is the point where people presenting your theory just start getting big mad and making personal attacks: because I want to understand the specifics.

>There's literally no evidence of any "virus" ever provided

That's what the curly haired guy in the video kept repeating, but it's untrue because you don't need a electron-microscope to analyze DNA.

Here's some compelling evidence about the genetic breakdown of the Covid-19 virus which chemically demonstrates how it targets different races:

https://archive.is/lPN6d
genesisSOC on scored.co
27 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>How, when the family members each live different lifestyles, spend their time in different locations and eat different foods?

It can be literally any toxin, even EMFs. Chemtrails. Water supply. Off gassing in the house from wet modern building materials. Literally anything.
>his is important, a critical part of your alternate theory that needs to be explained before I can take it seriously.

Why? The onus is on you and jews to prove viruses are real, which you never did. You just repeated it enough that people think they've always been real when they were never proved.
>his is the point where people presenting your theory just start getting big mad and making personal attacks

Just because you do this doesn't mean I do.
>but it's untrue because you don't need a electron-microscope to analyze DNA.

Yet he and I already explained it can't view carbon material, so it's only viewing iron radiated toxic unpurified or isolated culture with oxides artifacting off the lens. Do you not understand how electron microscopes work? And do you even realize DNA is an assumption based on phosphate?
>Here's some compelling evidence

Which part of this is compelling? All I see are assumptions on theories never proven, while all evidence proves otherwise, such as [how Wuhan rolled out 5G the exact same time "covid" started](https://archive.fo/cPm28). It's just a coincidence, goy
steele2 on scored.co
27 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>It can be literally any toxin

That's a massive coincidence that it happened every year during winter and affects entire households at the same time.

Which only makes me question why such a common use-case hasn't been isolated to a cause. If it's not magic and we have millions of testable cases each year... but no specific cause only makes the coincidental claims less credible.

>Why? The onus is on you

The theory is yours and so is the burden of proof.

>DNA is an assumption based on phosphate

Wew - let's deal with one of your baseless claims at a time, rather than just hosing me with your beliefs.

We can get back to this and the existence of nucleotides after exploring your earlier baseless claims.

>Which part of this is compelling?

Nucleotides and mapping the entire human genome is compelling.

Do you not believe in nucleotides either???

>It's just a coincidence, goy

And here come the personal attacks, as I predicted and right on schedule.

Also, 20 minutes ago you were claiming that it's common for entire households of people who live vastly different lifestyles to all come down with the "seasonal sniffles" at the same time of year... because of coincidental unknowable mysterious toxins that nobody has yet been able to trace to a source.
genesisSOC on scored.co
27 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>That's a massive coincidence that it happened every year during winter and affects entire households at the same time.

Yeah, we detox the most in the winter months usually. It's no different than how every autumn, the tree leaves turn yellow and orange and fall off. Does that mean some "contagious virus" caused that, too? Of course not, especially when no "contagious virus" has ever been proven to exist.
>Which only makes me question why such a common use-case hasn't been isolated to a cause.

It has: toxins.
>If it's not magic and we have millions of testable cases each year... but no specific cause only makes the coincidental claims less credible.

You really think jews let us keep doing the studies proving them wrong?
>The theory is yours and so is the burden of proof.

No, germ theory is yours and you never provided the burden of proof. You forgot that, but I didn't. I don't have to prove Terrain Theory because Germ Theory was never proven first. *You* started saying viruses existed around 1900s and caused diseased, but you never proved it.
>Wew - let's deal with one of your baseless claims at a time, rather than just hosing me with your beliefs.
We can get back to this and the existence of nucleotides after exploring your earlier baseless claims.

Okay, so you don't understand basic science and DNA. Got it, now I know you're more of an NPC normie and will adjust my speech for you accordingly. You gotta stop with the appeal to authority logical fallacy then, or you'll always keep losing to me.
>Nucleotides and mapping the entire human genome is compelling.
Do you not believe in nucleotides either???

You mean the things that have never been proven to exist? Correct, I don't believe in jewish nonsense, especially when they all rely on PCR, which you know, is jewed. I could literally take your "DNA sample" and make it say you're a female nigger with PCR if I wanted to.
>And here come the personal attacks, as I predicted and right on schedule.

It wasn't directed at you, it was proving the point. You already began the personal insults way earlier, so even if I was directing at you, it only makes me more right.
>because of coincidental unknowable mysterious toxins that nobody has yet been able to trace to a source.

I don't know why you think it's not been able to be traced to a source. We all know toxins and EMFs cause these symptoms and way more. We also know that viruses and contagions have never been proven to exist, much less shown to cause any disease or illness. For [example](https://zoryglaser.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/BIBLIOGRAPHY-OF-REPORTED-BIOLOGICAL-PHENOMENA-EFFECTS-AND-CLINICAL-MANIFESTATIONS-ATTRIBUTED-TO-MICROWAVE-AND-RADIO-FREQUENCY-RADIATION-C.pdf)\
Now, answer me: is it just a coincidence that every single "epidemic" ever including Covid perfectly coincides with the release and location of 5G and other EMFs? Right now we even have 6G and "hantavirus," so how many more times does this have to happen before you say "Wow this antivaxx germ theory denying flat earther White supremacist Christian Identity guy is actually right and I should probably start studying this stuff instead of blindly listening to epstein jews"?
steele2 on scored.co
27 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>It has: toxins.

No it hasn't - you just made that up.

Prove me wrong by showing me the study which names the specific toxin / toxins responsible for the seasonal sniffles that is commonly referred to as the flu virus.

>You really think jews let us keep doing the studies proving them wrong?

So you are presenting a baseless theory?

In other words, a feeling or opinion.

I can't take your theory seriously if you can't substantiate it with anything but your belief.

>I don't know why you think it's not been able to be traced to a source.

You said you have no studies to present, yet claim they have been done and prove you correct.

The credibility of your baseless claims has been stretched too thin to be taken seriously. You present nothing but feelings and a video of a fuzzy-haired man making false claims about electron microscopy.

I gave you every opportunity to present a compelling argument based on substance and you presented your baseless opinions instead.

 You have wasted both of our time.
Toast message