Hong Kong... You mean the British colony that White people built over 150 years? White people turned South Africa into a great country too until they were kicked out. Asians in general seem much better at operating functioning infrastructure instead of destroying it than blacks so Whites dominating the administrating if a Chinese area leading to that area being prominent and continuing to be so, makes sense.
His writeup is pretty accurate.
I'm quite confident that when China does IQ tests for any study, they specifically take from subgroups they know will result in higher IQs. Jews do the same trick. It's like gerrymandering but for IQ. People who do the studies fall for modern race theory and don't realize their sample has been tampered with.
Thankfully for china the largest subgroup is indeed the Han chinese, as their native range also happens to be the most populated part of china so the average is pretty decent and probably fairly accurate (though there is definitely some selection bias for sure). Significant Mixing with the Han chinese in ancient times also brings up the average in the southeast and South Central provinces to decent numbers.
Looking at a map of iq averages *by province* is significantly more damming. You will find IQs well above 100 in the northeast but sometimes less than 90 in the southwest. Tibet in particular is extremely dire, and it's really kind of hard to say why. Why there is such an astronomical difference between Han chinese and Tibetans, when they are in fact related, is a strange question to ponder. Tibetans score significantly lower than even purely austronesian countries like Cambodia. They might be making the numbers for Tibet look worse though, as proof that they need to control Tibet because tibetans are stupid. I don't believe in free Tibet myself, so I don't really care. Just my take on it.
This is also considering that china has selection biases in its studies. So it's selecting the best of its southwestern regions to skew the data. I believe that the data on northeasterners is accurate. The ancient Han chinese built one of the most advanced societies on the planet and were the torchbearers for every single east asian civilization that has ever existed (to a much greater extent than even rome was to the west. No the *entirety* of every neighboring countrys society comes from china, with the exception of *maybe* mongolia to an extent). If you want to get into deep schizo-tier archaeogenetics, theres some belief that the han chinese are of aryan descent because of either shared ancestry with tianyuan man and the indo europeans, or because of an indo european ruling class. I dont believe the 2nd one at all (chinese civilization long predates indo european arrival into china), the first one is true but i dont know how important it can really be considered. I do not believe the numbers for the people primarily descended from tribal jungle dwellers who the ancient chinese identified as hopeless retards.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
His writeup is pretty accurate.
I'm quite confident that when China does IQ tests for any study, they specifically take from subgroups they know will result in higher IQs. Jews do the same trick. It's like gerrymandering but for IQ. People who do the studies fall for modern race theory and don't realize their sample has been tampered with.
Looking at a map of iq averages *by province* is significantly more damming. You will find IQs well above 100 in the northeast but sometimes less than 90 in the southwest. Tibet in particular is extremely dire, and it's really kind of hard to say why. Why there is such an astronomical difference between Han chinese and Tibetans, when they are in fact related, is a strange question to ponder. Tibetans score significantly lower than even purely austronesian countries like Cambodia. They might be making the numbers for Tibet look worse though, as proof that they need to control Tibet because tibetans are stupid. I don't believe in free Tibet myself, so I don't really care. Just my take on it.
This is also considering that china has selection biases in its studies. So it's selecting the best of its southwestern regions to skew the data. I believe that the data on northeasterners is accurate. The ancient Han chinese built one of the most advanced societies on the planet and were the torchbearers for every single east asian civilization that has ever existed (to a much greater extent than even rome was to the west. No the *entirety* of every neighboring countrys society comes from china, with the exception of *maybe* mongolia to an extent). If you want to get into deep schizo-tier archaeogenetics, theres some belief that the han chinese are of aryan descent because of either shared ancestry with tianyuan man and the indo europeans, or because of an indo european ruling class. I dont believe the 2nd one at all (chinese civilization long predates indo european arrival into china), the first one is true but i dont know how important it can really be considered. I do not believe the numbers for the people primarily descended from tribal jungle dwellers who the ancient chinese identified as hopeless retards.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed