New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
posted 2 days ago by SicilianOmega on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
devotech2 on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Thankfully for china the largest subgroup is indeed the Han chinese, as their native range also happens to be the most populated part of china so the average is pretty decent and probably fairly accurate (though there is definitely some selection bias for sure). Significant Mixing with the Han chinese in ancient times also brings up the average in the southeast and South Central provinces to decent numbers.

Looking at a map of iq averages *by province* is significantly more damming. You will find IQs well above 100 in the northeast but sometimes less than 90 in the southwest. Tibet in particular is extremely dire, and it's really kind of hard to say why. Why there is such an astronomical difference between Han chinese and Tibetans, when they are in fact related, is a strange question to ponder. Tibetans score significantly lower than even purely austronesian countries like Cambodia. They might be making the numbers for Tibet look worse though, as proof that they need to control Tibet because tibetans are stupid. I don't believe in free Tibet myself, so I don't really care. Just my take on it.

This is also considering that china has selection biases in its studies. So it's selecting the best of its southwestern regions to skew the data. I believe that the data on northeasterners is accurate. The ancient Han chinese built one of the most advanced societies on the planet and were the torchbearers for every single east asian civilization that has ever existed (to a much greater extent than even rome was to the west. No the *entirety* of every neighboring countrys society comes from china, with the exception of *maybe* mongolia to an extent). If you want to get into deep schizo-tier archaeogenetics, theres some belief that the han chinese are of aryan descent because of either shared ancestry with tianyuan man and the indo europeans, or because of an indo european ruling class. I dont believe the 2nd one at all (chinese civilization long predates indo european arrival into china), the first one is true but i dont know how important it can really be considered. I do not believe the numbers for the people primarily descended from tribal jungle dwellers who the ancient chinese identified as hopeless retards.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Toast message