☢️ WARNING: Radioactive Levels of Boomer Kike Retardation! ☢️
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
And even if things do get bad enough, you can't trust the people to accomplish anything without a vanguard to direct that violence towards something. Otherwise, people will lash out sporadically against random bullshit but will never have the organization necessary to enact anything. Every successful revolt has a vanguard party directing it. Most failed revolts come from the masses. Note: "vanguardism" is considered in the same vain as bolshevism, but it's far from exclusive to it. Vanguardism as a defined political movement is actually more fascistic than it is bolshevist, given that the entire (defined) concept comes from the forefather of fascism. But precedents to formally defined "vanguardism" have existed since ancient Greece and Rome. It isn't anything new, at all.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
That’s why government is such a huge bureaucracy so we can’t target one person, but local officials that sell out the citizens for corporations are readily available targets.
In political terms though a vanguard party has to exist because the masses are incapable of suddenly gaining consciousness and expelling their slavers (real or perceived). This is true of both fascism and leninism. I think that this has a lot of merit because nobody has ever accomplished any political goal with the sporadic, random violence that the masses as an entity can enact. It takes a sustained effort, strong leaders, and sufficient and recurring propagandization of a group of revolutionaries to do something worthwhile.
The lack of a political vanguard is also the reason that anarchists, trotskyites, libertarians, etc have never accomplished anything *ever*. They all fundamentally disagree with the vanguard concept, and think that the maas of the people can randomly act and do things. Notice how there has never been a single state (or lack thereof) predicated on any of these ideologies. Ever. There has never been one. No trotskyite state, no libertarian state, no anarchist (non) state (that lasted for any time whatsoever). You can find countless states with various random ideologies throughout history, but none of these ones. All the same ideologies that explicitly reject party rule. Curious.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed