Consume Product

The term vanguard itself just means "the leading figure in a thing" (as it relates to this, but the word has 2 meanings.

In political terms though a vanguard party has to exist because the masses are incapable of suddenly gaining consciousness and expelling their slavers (real or perceived). This is true of both fascism and leninism. I think that this has a lot of merit because nobody has ever accomplished any political goal with the sporadic, random violence that the masses as an entity can enact. It takes a sustained effort, strong leaders, and sufficient and recurring propagandization of a group of revolutionaries to do something worthwhile.

The lack of a political vanguard is also the reason that anarchists, trotskyites, libertarians, etc have never accomplished anything *ever*. They all fundamentally disagree with the vanguard concept, and think that the maas of the people can randomly act and do things. Notice how there has never been a single state (or lack thereof) predicated on any of these ideologies. Ever. There has never been one. No trotskyite state, no libertarian state, no anarchist (non) state (that lasted for any time whatsoever). You can find countless states with various random ideologies throughout history, but none of these ones. All the same ideologies that explicitly reject party rule. Curious.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed