https://youtu.be/-PamR28b8K0
TL;DR: Hezbollah (Lebanon) is curb-stomping and immobilizing the IDF using $200 FPV (First Person View) drones to attack IDF troops and tanks using anti-tank payloads. Entire IDF bases are being abandoned as kike terrorists flee for their lives.
-----------------------------------
* [Although Hezbollah drones carry anti-tank explosives, they have been focusing on targeting IDF troops rather than empty IDF tanks as an act of psychological warfare because fuck the jew.](https://i.imgur.com/t4jrjdI.jpeg)
* IDF are abandoning their bases because they don't like Hezbolla drones destroying all of their vehicles and flying through base windows to kill them.
* Hezbollah's drones circumvent IDF electronic countermeasures using thin fiberoptic cable connecting the drone to the operator. Primitive yet effective technology.
* 80% of IDF operations have been immobilized because these drones are so effective, preventing troops from moving during the day or operating vehicles or walking in the open.
* IDF are attempting to mitigate these drone attacks by huddled together inside huge tents covered by fishing nets. Hezbollah have responded by dropping big fucking bombs on these rodent nests.
* Hezbollah drones have recently destroyed two IDF Iron Dome batteries, leaving only eight operating.
Have you played Ukraine Fight Drone Simulator? How realistic is it? For example in the game if you hit a T-72 "wherever", it almost never knocks it out. Besides missing the ERA blocks you really need to aim precisely at the magazine or exact location of the crew inside. I don't disagree that hitting the engine by attacking the hull from the back is not hard.
Why is it that the FPV footage on the internet often shows Russians and Ukrainians carefully lining up a hit in stable mode, rather than just diving in like the we see Hezbollah doing.
Second question. One Ukrainian source I read was emphatic about the focused nature of the cumulative jet. According to the article if you hit the cab of a light vehicle it is not uncommon to only kill one man in the jet path, while the others get just a concussion. They said that warhead produces very little shrapnel. I guess if you pen the cab of a tank there would be spalling to kill the crew?
Can a Markeva really not take a frontal hit from a RPG7? That seems crazy to me.
**Edit:** After looking at your comment history I seriously doubt you are a war FPV pilot.
>I always avoid Walmart but recently had to go there to buy something.
>Reminds of some Canadian tourists whose ride broke down here a while back, so they were stuck. I offered to give them a ride and they agreed. But then they saw that I had rifles in my truck (I live in bumfuck nowhere country with wildlife everywhere)
What country on earth has daily driver trucks, and walmart, but is also currently participating in a war involving tanks? I'm calling bullshit. Even if you're in the US military you wouldn't have actual combat experience against tanks using FPV drones.
Everyone uses acro mode on the front lines, again I have no idea where you see stable mode being used. Its easier to line up a hit in acro mode if you're a good operator. Much harder on a moving vehicle. Stable mode is easier to shoot down.
We use a lot of tandem warheads.
Merkavas have thick armor but not enough to prevent the engine from being disabled, especially with tandem warhead.
The rest I'm not answering for opsec reasons.
Correct me if Im wrong here, but stable would not be used on a moving target, it would be used to sneek through narrow gaps and manuver in quarters barely larger than the drone. You do see this in the video footage. Example, enemy tank heavily covered in foliage. The pilot carefully manuvers through the branches and hits the driver hatch or similar. For this use stable is superior.
And I say that as someone who only flew acro prior to playing UFDS. Now I see that there are times where stable is superior.