New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
https://youtu.be/-PamR28b8K0

TL;DR: Hezbollah (Lebanon) is curb-stomping and immobilizing the IDF using $200 FPV (First Person View) drones to attack IDF troops and tanks using anti-tank payloads. Entire IDF bases are being abandoned as kike terrorists flee for their lives.

-----------------------------------

* [Although Hezbollah drones carry anti-tank explosives, they have been focusing on targeting IDF troops rather than empty IDF tanks as an act of psychological warfare because fuck the jew.](https://i.imgur.com/t4jrjdI.jpeg)

* IDF are abandoning their bases because they don't like Hezbolla drones destroying all of their vehicles and flying through base windows to kill them.

* Hezbollah's drones circumvent IDF electronic countermeasures using thin fiberoptic cable connecting the drone to the operator. Primitive yet effective technology.

* 80% of IDF operations have been immobilized because these drones are so effective, preventing troops from moving during the day or operating vehicles or walking in the open.

* IDF are attempting to mitigate these drone attacks by huddled together inside huge tents covered by fishing nets. Hezbollah have responded by dropping big fucking bombs on these rodent nests.

* Hezbollah drones have recently destroyed two IDF Iron Dome batteries, leaving only eight operating.
You must log in or sign up to comment
9 comments:
hitlerismyidol on scored.co
2 days ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
If this post is truthful which I hope it is...

Plz hurt the nose nigger, so bad they come crying to the world about the fact they are outclassed by people they don't even consider human.
steele2 on scored.co
2 days ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
Keep in mind that Hamas aren't even a military - they're a civilian force of husbands and fathers wearing sandals who've outsmarted the United States of Israel's best military technology by:

* blocking AI drone technology by running around with bed sheets over their heads.

* hiding in tunnels

* overcoming Merkava tank missile interception technology by running up to the tanks and leaving the explosives on the hull

* constructing $100 anti-tank grenades to pop in the open hatch of $6 million IDF Merkava tanks because they know those tanks get uncomfortably hot in summer.

* having snipers hiding in building for weeks to make the IDF think the area is secure

* building cable networks of video surveillance using the reversing cameras from cars

* Even Yemen, the poorest nation in the middle east, have developed $200 balsa stealth drones capable of flying 1,500 miles just so they can trigger bomb shelter warnings in Tel-Aviv as an economic attack to force their entire economy (especially airports) to die and ensure bomb shelter sirens sound most nights in Tel-Aviv at 2am as a psychological attack to fuck with every civilian.

* I've seen unarmed Hamas fighters chase down IDF tanks, as the tanks attempted to flee, until they got close enough to start pressing buttons and pulling handles on the hull of the tank in an attempt to get inside to kill the jews inside. Breathtaking and magnificent.
hitlerismyidol on scored.co
2 days ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
It was! Very magnificent

I can get behind this, isreal doesn't want us knowing that they've losing like little bitches
Delroy on scored.co
2 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
Nice. Honestly the reason for the tanks is probably that even with a rpg7 warhead its pretty hard to kill a tank. The cumulative jet is only about half a meter long and 1cm wide. If you don't hit something spicy inside the tank, then no joy. It wont pierce those ERA blocks on the front and sides either. Based on the videos I've seen Hezbollah sucks at hitting weak points. You not only have to hit the right spot, the warhead has to be aimed correctly.

Killing infantry is much more straightforward. Get close, detonate. Even there you see them often run into a guy or the ground, instead of manual det at head level.
RussianWarCriminal on scored.co
2 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Total bullshit. I'm an FPV drone operator. T-72s can be easily disabled with a PG-7 warhead hitting pretty much any part of the back of the tank, you will destroy the engine/ transmission. If you hit the back of the turret you will also kill the crew. On a Merkava you will destroy the engine/ transmission with a frontal hit and kill the crew with a back hit.
Delroy on scored.co
2 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Alright fair enough. I'm not the kind of guy who's proud of ignorance and you sound like you know what you're talking about so I've got some questions.

Have you played Ukraine Fight Drone Simulator? How realistic is it? For example in the game if you hit a T-72 "wherever", it almost never knocks it out. Besides missing the ERA blocks you really need to aim precisely at the magazine or exact location of the crew inside. I don't disagree that hitting the engine by attacking the hull from the back is not hard.

Why is it that the FPV footage on the internet often shows Russians and Ukrainians carefully lining up a hit in stable mode, rather than just diving in like the we see Hezbollah doing.

Second question. One Ukrainian source I read was emphatic about the focused nature of the cumulative jet. According to the article if you hit the cab of a light vehicle it is not uncommon to only kill one man in the jet path, while the others get just a concussion. They said that warhead produces very little shrapnel. I guess if you pen the cab of a tank there would be spalling to kill the crew?

Can a Markeva really not take a frontal hit from a RPG7? That seems crazy to me.

**Edit:** After looking at your comment history I seriously doubt you are a war FPV pilot.

>I always avoid Walmart but recently had to go there to buy something.

>Reminds of some Canadian tourists whose ride broke down here a while back, so they were stuck. I offered to give them a ride and they agreed. But then they saw that I had rifles in my truck (I live in bumfuck nowhere country with wildlife everywhere)

What country on earth has daily driver trucks, and walmart, but is also currently participating in a war involving tanks? I'm calling bullshit. Even if you're in the US military you wouldn't have actual combat experience against tanks using FPV drones.
RussianWarCriminal on scored.co
2 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
UFDS is currently the most realistic drone sim on the market. I don't know what you're talking about, I can destroy a stationary T-72 in 15s in acro mode. You just need more practice.

Everyone uses acro mode on the front lines, again I have no idea where you see stable mode being used. Its easier to line up a hit in acro mode if you're a good operator. Much harder on a moving vehicle. Stable mode is easier to shoot down.

We use a lot of tandem warheads.

Merkavas have thick armor but not enough to prevent the engine from being disabled, especially with tandem warhead.

The rest I'm not answering for opsec reasons.
Delroy on scored.co
2 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I can kill a T72 that fast too in UFDS, but my point was that placement matters. You cant just hit it center mass.

Correct me if Im wrong here, but stable would not be used on a moving target, it would be used to sneek through narrow gaps and manuver in quarters barely larger than the drone. You do see this in the video footage. Example, enemy tank heavily covered in foliage. The pilot carefully manuvers through the branches and hits the driver hatch or similar. For this use stable is superior.

And I say that as someone who only flew acro prior to playing UFDS. Now I see that there are times where stable is superior.
steele2 on scored.co
2 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The Al‑Yassin 105 are based on RPG-7/PG-7VR.

I've seen video of countless tanks getting wrecked mostly from the Al‑Yassin 105 shoulder-fired launchers.

I've seen a few tank turret-toss from those missiles too.

They seem effective enough.
Toast message