Consume Product

Back in the 1800s, all of the engineers and construction workers would have been White men. Even without considering if free energy is real or not, we've lost insane amounts of productivity by allowing women and minorities into our workplaces.

Of course, this also applies to nasa, they no longer have the right stuff. They didn't lose the technology, they lost the old German rocket scientists who made the technology work. And they would have gone far beyond Apollo if allowed, look into Project Orion and nuclear pulse propulsion.

Tartaria, Atlantis, mud floods, and more. Good luck finding any solid info. on them though, jews love to destroy and revise history.

We can no longer afford to make beautiful buildings because:

* our ((( usury central banking grift ))) consumes 1/3 of our tax dollars in interest fees

* ((( jew central bank inflation )))

* Greater Israel forever wars caused by our Epstein extorted and AIPAC bribed Congress

* The enormous expense of our ((( Military Industrial Complex ))) which make weapons of profit rather than effective weapons of war.

* Skyrocketing social program costs because jews have held open the gates of America to the entire world of inbred niggers.

This guy made a pretty on point video about it: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tWYxrowovts

The costs went from $200M at inception to $500M, today, in a year's time. It wouldn't surprise me if the final costs top $1B.

Most of the major donations have come from jewish donors and most of the companies that have been hired are also jewish.

There are probably a lot of pay-to-play schemes, tax loopholes, and grifting involved. A fine testament to what America has become. It should be named the Baalroom.

I don't understand why it has to be attached to the White House. A stand alone National Ballroom would probably see more use.

Look at an old Victorian house, the materials alone would cost several times more than buying a house of equivalent size filled with modern amenities. Then look how ornate it is, even if you can find a few people who can do the work they cost several times more than a bunch of Mexicans and kids. Those old Victorians usually have a turret (the round room at the front that goes all the way up. Those have curved glass, last I checked 10+ years ago only one company in the us still makes curved glass and it costs many times more than flat glass. Part of the quality comes from the fact that it was all made without power tools every piece was cut with a hand saw and every nail driven with a hammer. That will multiply the time and therefore the cost. In short our minds can hardly comprehend the real inflation numbers.

Modern building techniques are easier and cheaper than older techniques. Old buildings are made of lots on stone newer ones are wood and stucco.

Because there was a war between bean-counters and artisans over several decades that took place across many industries. The bean-counters won and now everything is done on a cost/benefit analysis. The primary goal is "how can we increase market capital?" or "How can we make more money for our shareholders?" not "How can we make something beautiful or better?"

This is a pretty American issue. Of course, Europeans also have flimsy modern construction, but there are so many extremely old buildings already in Europe that there is little necessity (in comparison) to build anything new. Especially not residential property. Nobody here lives in a building that was produced any time recently. In spain however there are a decent number of people that live in franco-era "commie blocks" (this wasn't a soviet only phenomenon), but these are made out of concrete and rebar. They aren't going anywhere any time soon. They are ugly flats, but they are strong and durable.

Now, as for when and why. American building quality started going downhill after ww2. Construction companies realized that it was easier and cheaper to build houses out of cheap lumber (not good lumber, but rather just wood composites) than it was to build them out of bricks, stones, and hardwood. It's even cheaper to just build a brand new house out of bullshit, should the previous house be destroyed for whatever reason, than it is to just build one out of stone and bricks. The baby boom, coupled with large amounts of unused land, hastened the building of suburbs constructed with shit-quality houses and mcmansions. By todays standards (in america) the baby-boom era houses are actually *high* quality constructions, but at the time they were the original manufactured houses and the worst quality buildings yet seen in the country. It got worse from there.

Now this is coupled with the following: the further streamlining of the process, the accessibility of even cheaper and even worse materials, the utterly outrageous price of a house vs what it costs to make it, and the fact that investors and speculators who have enough money will buy them anyways for that outrageous price. Regardless of how fast the house will end up falling apart, a massive profit will be gained from these enshittified houses anyways.

There is exactly 0 impetus for construction companies and realtors to shift to making higher quality, more expensive to produce houses, when they can rack up the price of a cheap piece of a shit to an absolutely ridiculous number and then sell off the house to Blackrock anyways. Having a house that falls apart also puts money into the hands of insurance companies, so there's that as well.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed

The ballroom includes a massive underground facility and extensive security features.