English Civil War: For the first time, successfully, the people of England rose up against the king and killed him. They moved from having the king as the center of power to the parliament.
Puritan pilgrims: For some time the puritans ruled over England. However, the English people rejected them and their ideas. They fled to the Netherlands, and eventually found a way to flee Europe altogether, since Europe was not welcoming to their strict way of life. They were the first successful colonists in the Americas. Up until then, Europeans had only been able to trade or subjugate the native population. The pilgrims were actual Europeans (from England) moving to America to build their own towns and cities and spread their own way of life, without including the native population.
American Revolution: The same people who helped overthrow the king of England moved to the American continent, where they built their own homes on their own land. Multiple times the king of england tried to get them to stop taking land from the Indians but they wouldn't listen to him. When the king tried to use force, the Americans fought back. Eventually the Americans decided they could have their own parliament -- the Continental Congress. (The US constitution doesn't come around for some time later.)
American Civil War: Ostensibly fought over the question of slavery, the reality is that the Southern States wanted to be freed from the Northern States over various issues, including slavery but more importantly, they felt like they had the economic base and financial backing to win because there was a massive market crash that destroyed the northern economy. Lincoln won the war not because his men were better at fighting or smarter (they weren't) but because he figured out how to print his own money and get people to accept it. The North fought against the South and the rest of the world and the world banking conglomerate and won.
WWI / WWII: America showed the world that we were the only superpower that ever existed. Europeans who were smart understood this and built NATO, which was a vassal organization to the US. Because of US mismanagement, things had gotten out of control, but we are re-asserting ourselves and our interests, partly because we're sick of your shit but also because no amount of help from us is making your life better because you are all losers. We would help you fix it if we could, but we can't, so sayonara suckers.
Cromwell was an idealistic retard who had decent intentions but ended up flooding England with jews. The consequences of this are still felt today across the entire world. It also wasn't "the people of england". It was some of them, and cromwell and thomas fairfax were really good generals. The english Civil War was split into a number of different sides. Roundheads, cavaliers, Covenanters, and the true levelers, to name a few. It was nearly as complex as the russian civil war.
>They were the first successful colonists in the Americas. Up until then, Europeans had only been able to trade or subjugate the native population. The pilgrims were actual Europeans (from England) moving to America to build their own towns and cities and spread their own way of life, without including the native population.
Wrong, they werent the first successful colonists. The Jamestown colonists were. The jamestown colonists were anglicans. You are also forgetting every other religious colony that was created independently of the puritan ones in New England, such as Maryland or Pennsylvania specifically or the colonies in the southeast such as the carolina colony more broadly.
This is also changing goalposts for no reason. The Spanish and portuguese weren't unsuccessful at all. It isnt a lack of "being able to", they didnt even care about doing it at all. They didn't even want to colonize central and South America, they wanted to conquer it to spread religion and make money. They were 100% successful in everything they set out to do because they never wanted to colonize it anyways. And from the perspective of the king of England, he had exactly the same reason for colonization as iberia, England just happened to have a bunch of religious wars and multiple competing sects at the time that spain did not which caused a mass exodus from England because of persecution and violence. America's (former, as there are now iberian colonies more white than it) whiteness is more of a happy accident that was spurred on my a specific alignment of events than it was a conceited effort by the English. If there werent religious violence, it would have been mestizo too.
>The same people who helped overthrow the king of England moved to the American continent, where they built their own homes on their own land
Also the descendants of the: the cavaliers (mostly anglicans, some catholics), who made up a greater proportion of the colonies than the puritans did by percentage and number. Moreover, they were the first to go to the americas anyways. The 13 colonies and the early United States were both dominated by the Anglican church more than any other institution, politically and spiritually. The puritans were second place and puritanism splintered into about 5000 different religious sects that today are so heretical that they are absolutely disgusting mockeries.
>When the king tried to use force, the Americans fought back. Eventually the Americans decided they could have their own parliament -- the Continental Congress. (The US constitution doesn't come around for some time later.)
The king had no power to do shit. Britain was already a constitutional monarchy and king George had the same power as king Charles today (symbolic power, meaning basically none at all). The american revolution was fought over the bank of England and the British parliament. The king had virtually no political power.
>WWI / WWII: America showed the world that we were the only superpower that ever existed. Europeans who were smart understood this and built NATO, which was a vassal organization to the US. Because of US mismanagement, things had gotten out of control, but we are re-asserting ourselves and our interests, partly because we're sick of your shit but also because no amount of help from us is making your life better because you are all losers. We would help you fix it if we could, but we can't, so sayonara suckers.
This was all well after the United States was fully occupied by the worldly jew. It doesn't matter. The jews turned the United states into their own personal superpower to do whatever they want to do because the UK couldn't fill that role anymore. This is not a good thing, not even remotely close to it. This is actually the worst outcome that could have possibly happened.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Whether or not that is true (and based on my research on the topic it is) it does not change the fact that the fabric of my political history was formed in the English Civil War. The ideas that the regular English people had at the time were preserved in America and solidified.
> the first successful colony
The puritans became the backbone of America. Jamestown did not.
If you're going to trace the political history of America, it's going to go through Plymouth, not Jamestown.
Over half of the founding fathers were Anglican, a significant number descended from the Virginia, Pennsylvania, and southeastern colonies. Puritanism was already effectively dead by the time the first stirrings of revolutionary sentiment even occurred. It splintered into other denominations and competed with other denominations from Europe. They also assimilated and secularized. By contrast, anglicanism wouldn't be in decline until large numbers of Scots and ulster Scots made their way to the US en masse. Anglicanism and the Virginia colony in general were arguably far more important to American political history, as the puritans were forced to assimilate into this broader society or fall by the wayside. This is in no small part due to the fact that the Virginia colony actually enjoyed support from the crown while the puritans more or less had to fend for themselves, as they were political and religious enemies before and after cromwell, even after the stuarts were overthrown they still were not favored by the house of orange or the hanoverians, which still favored anglicanism and other protestants over the puritans.
>The ideas that the regular English people had at the time were preserved in America and solidified.
Only the ideas of cromwell? Because America itself was a plurality of people from all sides of that war. Even puritans that hated cromwell. Not only that war either, but also the jacobite conflict(s) and the glorious revolution as well. There were a lot of different sentiments in america, and they did not get along. The founding fathers represented this and couldn't agree on much of anything in reality. It really came to a head in the civil war, but the fact that 2 polar opposite parties existed immediately upon Washington's death should show this well enough. The south in particular was colonized almost exclusively by cavaliers and Covenanters (or at least those who aligned with them) who hated the puritans, in fact this rhetoric of anti puritanism was heavy during the Civil war. Even though by that point anglicanism was dead in the water and most southerners followed protestantism originating from scottish calvinism (Covenanters, who had eventually allied themselves with the royalists over cromwell anyways). The only thing stopping a civil war as early as immediately after the new England colony was founded was the fact that America is big. And the puritans still attempted to destroy Maryland for being catholic and Anglican anyways once during the english Civil War.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed