New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
English Civil War: For the first time, successfully, the people of England rose up against the king and killed him. They moved from having the king as the center of power to the parliament.

Puritan pilgrims: For some time the puritans ruled over England. However, the English people rejected them and their ideas. They fled to the Netherlands, and eventually found a way to flee Europe altogether, since Europe was not welcoming to their strict way of life. They were the first successful colonists in the Americas. Up until then, Europeans had only been able to trade or subjugate the native population. The pilgrims were actual Europeans (from England) moving to America to build their own towns and cities and spread their own way of life, without including the native population.

American Revolution: The same people who helped overthrow the king of England moved to the American continent, where they built their own homes on their own land. Multiple times the king of england tried to get them to stop taking land from the Indians but they wouldn't listen to him. When the king tried to use force, the Americans fought back. Eventually the Americans decided they could have their own parliament -- the Continental Congress. (The US constitution doesn't come around for some time later.)

American Civil War: Ostensibly fought over the question of slavery, the reality is that the Southern States wanted to be freed from the Northern States over various issues, including slavery but more importantly, they felt like they had the economic base and financial backing to win because there was a massive market crash that destroyed the northern economy. Lincoln won the war not because his men were better at fighting or smarter (they weren't) but because he figured out how to print his own money and get people to accept it. The North fought against the South and the rest of the world and the world banking conglomerate and won.

WWI / WWII: America showed the world that we were the only superpower that ever existed. Europeans who were smart understood this and built NATO, which was a vassal organization to the US. Because of US mismanagement, things had gotten out of control, but we are re-asserting ourselves and our interests, partly because we're sick of your shit but also because no amount of help from us is making your life better because you are all losers. We would help you fix it if we could, but we can't, so sayonara suckers.
You must log in or sign up to comment
21 comments:
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
1 day ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
>but we are re-asserting ourselves and our interests

what interests? israeli interests? or the interests of those who fuck little kids?

>partly because we're sick of your shit but also because no amount of help from us is making your life better because you are all losers. We would help you fix it if we could, but we can't, so sayonara suckers

why would Europe put their neck on the line of fire for israeli-american interests? its boomers/jews like you who are the cancer of the World and i would have zero qualms putting a bullet between your eyes.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 day ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
> because no amount of help from us is making your life better

The US is the pet of the devil. If the US wouldn't exist, we'd be much better off.

For example 3rd Reich Germany would have won and liberated Europe from the jewish problem. The Soviets would have failed and never conquered half of Europe. Europeans wouldn't face extinction through infinity niggers importation.

> We would help you fix it if we could

You mean serve israel and jewish interests? That's the #1 priority the US has for 2+ decades.
Uberen on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
That's exactly what I intend us foreign policy to be.

F Europe

F the rest of the world

Don't mess with us we'll leave you alone

Which is exactly what Americans tell each other every day
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> Don't mess with us we'll leave you alone

Tell that to the jews. They did the USS Liberty incident in an attempt to create a false flag, and they did 9/11 to entangle the US into the Middle East on their behalf.

Today it all depends on the US turning on them. As long as the US runs defense for jews, nobody can rise up against them.
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 day ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Since you’re only here for D&C, kindly fuck the hell off to Reddit where you belong.
zk3hf9dB on scored.co
1 day ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Europeans complain about America ALL THE TIME.

But only when an American points out that they have their own mess to clean up -- it's D&C?

Europeans need to shut up about America, PERIOD. I'm sick of it.

Yes, we have problems, but they have their own problems.
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 day ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
So don’t compound them.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 day ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
>English Civil War: For the first time, successfully, the people of England rose up against the king and killed him. They moved from having the king as the center of power to the parliament.

Cromwell was an idealistic retard who had decent intentions but ended up flooding England with jews. The consequences of this are still felt today across the entire world. It also wasn't "the people of england". It was some of them, and cromwell and thomas fairfax were really good generals. The english Civil War was split into a number of different sides. Roundheads, cavaliers, Covenanters, and the true levelers, to name a few. It was nearly as complex as the russian civil war.

>They were the first successful colonists in the Americas. Up until then, Europeans had only been able to trade or subjugate the native population. The pilgrims were actual Europeans (from England) moving to America to build their own towns and cities and spread their own way of life, without including the native population.

Wrong, they werent the first successful colonists. The Jamestown colonists were. The jamestown colonists were anglicans. You are also forgetting every other religious colony that was created independently of the puritan ones in New England, such as Maryland or Pennsylvania specifically or the colonies in the southeast such as the carolina colony more broadly.

This is also changing goalposts for no reason. The Spanish and portuguese weren't unsuccessful at all. It isnt a lack of "being able to", they didnt even care about doing it at all. They didn't even want to colonize central and South America, they wanted to conquer it to spread religion and make money. They were 100% successful in everything they set out to do because they never wanted to colonize it anyways. And from the perspective of the king of England, he had exactly the same reason for colonization as iberia, England just happened to have a bunch of religious wars and multiple competing sects at the time that spain did not which caused a mass exodus from England because of persecution and violence. America's (former, as there are now iberian colonies more white than it) whiteness is more of a happy accident that was spurred on my a specific alignment of events than it was a conceited effort by the English. If there werent religious violence, it would have been mestizo too.

>The same people who helped overthrow the king of England moved to the American continent, where they built their own homes on their own land

Also the descendants of the: the cavaliers (mostly anglicans, some catholics), who made up a greater proportion of the colonies than the puritans did by percentage and number. Moreover, they were the first to go to the americas anyways. The 13 colonies and the early United States were both dominated by the Anglican church more than any other institution, politically and spiritually. The puritans were second place and puritanism splintered into about 5000 different religious sects that today are so heretical that they are absolutely disgusting mockeries.

>When the king tried to use force, the Americans fought back. Eventually the Americans decided they could have their own parliament -- the Continental Congress. (The US constitution doesn't come around for some time later.)

The king had no power to do shit. Britain was already a constitutional monarchy and king George had the same power as king Charles today (symbolic power, meaning basically none at all). The american revolution was fought over the bank of England and the British parliament. The king had virtually no political power.

 >WWI / WWII: America showed the world that we were the only superpower that ever existed. Europeans who were smart understood this and built NATO, which was a vassal organization to the US. Because of US mismanagement, things had gotten out of control, but we are re-asserting ourselves and our interests, partly because we're sick of your shit but also because no amount of help from us is making your life better because you are all losers. We would help you fix it if we could, but we can't, so sayonara suckers.

This was all well after the United States was fully occupied by the worldly jew. It doesn't matter. The jews turned the United states into their own personal superpower to do whatever they want to do because the UK couldn't fill that role anymore. This is not a good thing, not even remotely close to it. This is actually the worst outcome that could have possibly happened.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed



zk3hf9dB on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> Cromwell was an idealistic retard who had decent intentions but ended up flooding England with jews.

Whether or not that is true (and based on my research on the topic it is) it does not change the fact that the fabric of my political history was formed in the English Civil War. The ideas that the regular English people had at the time were preserved in America and solidified.

> the first successful colony

The puritans became the backbone of America. Jamestown did not.

If you're going to trace the political history of America, it's going to go through Plymouth, not Jamestown.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
>If you're going to trace the political history of America, it's going to go through Plymouth, not Jamestown.

Over half of the founding fathers were Anglican, a significant number descended from the Virginia, Pennsylvania, and southeastern colonies. Puritanism was already effectively dead by the time the first stirrings of revolutionary sentiment even occurred. It splintered into other denominations and competed with other denominations from Europe. They also assimilated and secularized. By contrast, anglicanism wouldn't be in decline until large numbers of Scots and ulster Scots made their way to the US en masse. Anglicanism and the Virginia colony in general were arguably far more important to American political history, as the puritans were forced to assimilate into this broader society or fall by the wayside. This is in no small part due to the fact that the Virginia colony actually enjoyed support from the crown while the puritans more or less had to fend for themselves, as they were political and religious enemies before and after cromwell, even after the stuarts were overthrown they still were not favored by the house of orange or the hanoverians, which still favored anglicanism and other protestants over the puritans.

>The ideas that the regular English people had at the time were preserved in America and solidified.

Only the ideas of cromwell? Because America itself was a plurality of people from all sides of that war. Even puritans that hated cromwell. Not only that war either, but also the jacobite conflict(s) and the glorious revolution as well. There were a lot of different sentiments in america, and they did not get along. The founding fathers represented this and couldn't agree on much of anything in reality. It really came to a head in the civil war, but the fact that 2 polar opposite parties existed immediately upon Washington's death should show this well enough. The south in particular was colonized almost exclusively by cavaliers and Covenanters (or at least those who aligned with them) who hated the puritans, in fact this rhetoric of anti puritanism was heavy during the Civil war. Even though by that point anglicanism was dead in the water and most southerners followed protestantism originating from scottish calvinism (Covenanters, who had eventually allied themselves with the royalists over cromwell anyways). The only thing stopping a civil war as early as immediately after the new England colony was founded was the fact that America is big. And the puritans still attempted to destroy Maryland for being catholic and Anglican anyways once during the english Civil War.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
CaptainTrouble on scored.co
1 day ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
The USA fought on the wrong side in both world wars. The wrong side won America's civil war. The last time the USA did something right was in the 1700s. Europe is shit but the USA is king shit in modernity.
zk3hf9dB on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
So when I say something not-nice about Europe, it's D&C, but when a European says shit about my country, it's OK?

FUCK OFF YOU LOSER
CaptainTrouble on scored.co
1 day ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
I'm not European but I find it hilarious when Americans try to act like the good guys. America fucked up modernity far more than Europe did. The Germans tried to save us from this hellhole and nearly succeeded. The Americans are a good part of why they didn't succeed. The USA has been serving jewish interest for well over a century.
zk3hf9dB on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
What were Europeans doing while America messed everything up?

OH YEAH -- nothing, because they are incapable of doing anything and have to wait for an American to show up.

It's all our fault that we won WWII, sorry about that, I guess?
CaptainTrouble on scored.co
1 day ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Huh, the Germans were busy trying to breaks the shakels of jewish rule and the Americans came to the rescue of jews by siding with jewish communists and a British empire that sacrificed its whole empire to prop up jews.

Yes you should be sorry you won WWII. You should be ashamed that you did.
zk3hf9dB on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Yes, because Hitler was too kind.

He failed.

Now what?

Are Europeans who couldn't stand up to Hitler, and Hitler's wehrmacht that fell to American farmboys going to do something about it?

Apparently not.

I don't have time to waste with people who only see problems and don't know how to solve anything. I've got a country to save.
Hullohoomans on scored.co
1 day ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Wow you suck at this. Literally no one was taught this shit, cuz it's all wrong.
disoriented on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
You forgot about the American southern colonies, retard, not to mention the many, many other settlements in the northeast, including and particularly Manhattan. You wrote a carefully abridged version of US history to support your own agenda. Fuck off.
zk3hf9dB on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The southern colonies were not the nexus that made the nation.
devotech2 on scored.co
22 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Virginia alone was the birthplace of the majority of the founding fathers. So they pretty much were, particularly the Virginia colony (however to be fair, the other southern colonies were fairly loyalist)

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Toast message