Abolish prisons, execute violent criminals
(media.scored.co)
You're telling me that lynching actually works? But muh history books
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
40 comments:
Niggers kept to themselves and stayed in line when lynching was allowed. They weren't trashing convenience store or looting shops when they knew what would happen to them.
Lynchings were never allowed, and the niggers didn't keep to themselves even then. After the civil war, the north would actively allow southern whites to get assaulted by niggers and stop efforts for whites to organize to defend themselves, so lynchings had to go underground and were constantly hunted by the government.
It also wasn't enough to keep nigs in line, even with the threat of death. Remember that whites didn't hunt niggers for fun; lynchings were only in places that niggers did heinous enough shit that whites would risk their lives and families to get justice. So any place with lynchings had niggers already fucking around and ruining white lives.
It also wasn't enough to keep nigs in line, even with the threat of death. Remember that whites didn't hunt niggers for fun; lynchings were only in places that niggers did heinous enough shit that whites would risk their lives and families to get justice. So any place with lynchings had niggers already fucking around and ruining white lives.
"It's leftists" says people who can't see that there is no political solution. National Socialism or Fascism are the choices to save your people and mankind, those are the real left and right choices. The political choices we have right now are just kike puppets which don't revert any of the opposite parties changes when they get into power. There is no political solution, only might.
Biblically speaking, there are only three forms of lawful punishment:
1. Restitution
2. Public flogging
3. Execution
This would solve a lot of the West's issues, as all non-Whites would quickly be executed.
1. Restitution
2. Public flogging
3. Execution
This would solve a lot of the West's issues, as all non-Whites would quickly be executed.
And the punishment for corrupt police, people in positions of authority should be even worse.
If being wrongfully accused got you killed, that would suck but if the consequence were greater for liars, I think this may curb that type of behaviour.
If being wrongfully accused got you killed, that would suck but if the consequence were greater for liars, I think this may curb that type of behaviour.
Prison system of America seems rarted to me.
If someone spends years behind bars, the chances of them playing nice when finally released is quite low.
"But murders who get freed rarely re offfend!"
They rarley reoffend when it comes to murder, that doesn't mean they stop committing petty crimes.
And even freed criminals who never reoffend probably don't become good citizens, they are probably rude bums post freedom.
If someone spends years behind bars, the chances of them playing nice when finally released is quite low.
"But murders who get freed rarely re offfend!"
They rarley reoffend when it comes to murder, that doesn't mean they stop committing petty crimes.
And even freed criminals who never reoffend probably don't become good citizens, they are probably rude bums post freedom.
> basically zero downsides
false. history has shown time and time again that extreme authoritarianism virtually always devolves from small scale executions to genocide.
now don't get me wrong, i think we should be prosecuting crime FAR more than we currently do (especially in deep blue shitholes), and even that our threshold for the death penalty is too high.
but giving government nearly unchecked power to execute people by declaring them violent is wildly anti-american. and as most people have seen, they will absolutely bend over backwards to defame political opponents as criminals.
false. history has shown time and time again that extreme authoritarianism virtually always devolves from small scale executions to genocide.
now don't get me wrong, i think we should be prosecuting crime FAR more than we currently do (especially in deep blue shitholes), and even that our threshold for the death penalty is too high.
but giving government nearly unchecked power to execute people by declaring them violent is wildly anti-american. and as most people have seen, they will absolutely bend over backwards to defame political opponents as criminals.
The downside is that governments are retarded. If there were a way to guarantee that muderers, rapists, and mud sharks all got the rope, without either false positives *or* shifting the goal posts to enable executions for "hate" crimes, I'd be all for it.
That said, less than 1% of the population ever sees the defendant side of a court room. If those people were just gone...
That said, less than 1% of the population ever sees the defendant side of a court room. If those people were just gone...
sure, if you could guarantee it would never be able to be abused, and 100% of people subject to it were overwhelmingly guilty by a standard even higher than "reasonable doubt"... then sure. and at that rate, i'd say fuck appeals, just hold the execution immediately after conviction.
but we can't guarantee that. look at all the bullshit political persecutions of orange man.
but we can't guarantee that. look at all the bullshit political persecutions of orange man.
I don't like the idea of "the government" having the authority to execute people. But a penal colony would be great.
I would even be willing to concede that many violent crimes should carry a death sentence, but that should be up to the victims or a proxy they opt for if they can't handle the execution themselves, or they could opt for leniency if they want the trash to live in their house and be responsible for them. This would allow many leftists to virtue signal by living with their favorite criminals, and when they suffer the inevitable consequences we have eliminated a whole another set of social troublemakers.
I would even be willing to concede that many violent crimes should carry a death sentence, but that should be up to the victims or a proxy they opt for if they can't handle the execution themselves, or they could opt for leniency if they want the trash to live in their house and be responsible for them. This would allow many leftists to virtue signal by living with their favorite criminals, and when they suffer the inevitable consequences we have eliminated a whole another set of social troublemakers.
Lol, that would be too easy.
The way it works is they need to suffer and learn theyre wrong BEFORE THEY DIE.
If they dont learn before the die, they haven't learned and must come back to learn again.
The way it works is they need to suffer and learn theyre wrong BEFORE THEY DIE.
If they dont learn before the die, they haven't learned and must come back to learn again.
Two problems with that. Reincarnation isn't real and niggers are too dumb to learn in any case.
> ... niggers are too dumb to learn in any case.
In which case they're eventually all executed and we free ourselves of their tyranny.
Like the man said, "zero downsides."
In which case they're eventually all executed and we free ourselves of their tyranny.
Like the man said, "zero downsides."
Execute the sickos, predators, commies, rapists, frauds, imbezzlers, and anyone that kills a chicken after putting their sins in it, but prisons serve a purpose for some crimes. The Bible doesn't dictate everything with a death sentence.
Id argue anyone that deserves a life sentence should be ended after an failed appeal.
Id argue anyone that deserves a life sentence should be ended after an failed appeal.
The prison system is just torture for those who haven't committed capital crime (and often results in them becoming more criminal by being exposed to the most degenerate element of society) and unjustly extends the lives of those who can only repay their debt to society by forfeiting them. Execution or some form of community service should be the only punishments (besides restitution of stolen goods, of course), the only purpose prison should have is temporarily holding suspected violent felons for trial and execution, not permanently housing them at the expense of society.
Toast message
You cannot breed the nigger out of the nigger. It would take ~5 genocides of killing the bottom 90% with leaving not a single one of those alive, which would take around a century. Then MAYBE you have niggers that are aren't as fucking stupid, vile and aggressive. We are talking about full-on, completely ruthlessly efficient eugenics - with the purpose of dedicating a LOT of effort into making niggers less like niggers.
Compared to that, what you describe is a tiny course correction.
Btw, you are aware that there are Whites, right? You don't need multi-generational, century spanning eugenics programs to breed something more similar to us (inferior versions that is) when there are *us* already.
The main reason is base genetics though.