9 months ago22 points(+0/-0/+22Score on mirror)1 child
Man, if I lived during the golden years of this country, I'd be so well off at this point. It's absurd how much wealth has been stolen from us.
But I also think, that was the "carrot" generation. They needed shabbos goys on their side, so showered the boomer with rewards for selling out their country.
Here in the good ol' US two years of the average salary will get you either a modest new mobile home with no land, or one that's falling apart sitting on a quarter acre.
9 months ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
Even a few years ago this was still reasonable. Let's be honest, the houses in these ads were pretty stripped down and small by todays standards. Small lots I'm sure. So with an average annual wage of $50k? Surez 5-10 years ago you could have found a house like this in many areas for $125k or so. Now? That same house is $300k. It is insane.
Let's not forget that big two-car garage houses are a judeo-capitalist invention themselves. People have never *needed* large houses. Boomers came from families of like 7 and grew up with a couple bedrooms. The reason modern developments are all-house-no-yard is because jews squeeze out a higher price by building bigger. It's the same reason US car manufacturers stopped making sedans in favor of SUVs--not because people actually need them--but because the goyim are stupid and buy them anyway.
Yes, and no. The issue isn't so much the size of modern homes but the cheaply built, mass-produced, poorly designed nature of the McMansion. There are plenty of 100-150+ year old homes around me and many of them are actually quite large. Especially some of the older farmhouses where the good soil is. Home size was always driven by affluence. The problem is that modern home construction is only an ersatz-affluence.
Nah, there are still natural resources left uncollected which is why they need their slave army of retarded browns to work until the oil wells are empty and all the forests are cut down.