New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
62
jews happened thats what (media.scored.co)
posted 9 months ago by derjudenjager on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +62Score on mirror )
20 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
19
derjudenjager on scored.co
9 months ago 19 points (+0 / -0 / +19Score on mirror ) 2 children
Sorry took me a minute.

This clipping is taken from 1955.

In 1955 the average wage was $3,400

A 3 bedroom house was worth about 2 and 1/4 years salary…
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
12
ScandinavianWhite on scored.co
9 months ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror )
Here in the good ol' US two years of the average salary will get you either a modest new mobile home with no land, or one that's falling apart sitting on a quarter acre.

Thanks jews!
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
7
HarlechMan on scored.co
9 months ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
Even a few years ago this was still reasonable. Let's be honest, the houses in these ads were pretty stripped down and small by todays standards. Small lots I'm sure. So with an average annual wage of $50k? Surez 5-10 years ago you could have found a house like this in many areas for $125k or so. Now? That same house is $300k. It is insane.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
systemthrowaway on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Let's not forget that big two-car garage houses are a judeo-capitalist invention themselves. People have never *needed* large houses. Boomers came from families of like 7 and grew up with a couple bedrooms. The reason modern developments are all-house-no-yard is because jews squeeze out a higher price by building bigger. It's the same reason US car manufacturers stopped making sedans in favor of SUVs--not because people actually need them--but because the goyim are stupid and buy them anyway.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
HarlechMan on scored.co
9 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Yes, and no. The issue isn't so much the size of modern homes but the cheaply built, mass-produced, poorly designed nature of the McMansion. There are plenty of 100-150+ year old homes around me and many of them are actually quite large. Especially some of the older farmhouses where the good soil is. Home size was always driven by affluence. The problem is that modern home construction is only an ersatz-affluence.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message