You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
3
devotech2 on scored.co
9 months ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)2 children
Christian zionism has its roots in puritan theology about the necessity of the conversion of the jews to bring about apocalypse. A false belief that led to cromwell erroneously allowing thousands of jews free passage into england under the impression that they would honestly convert to Christianity (they did not)
Eventually this devolved into dispensationalism and the belief that jews are "gods chosen people" because they say so. But the seeds were sown in England. Though, it goes back long before cromwell and was completed after his reign. Jews were first brought to England by William the bastard. They were given control over the banks by William of orange some 600 years later.
But cromwell's ignorance about jews led to philosemitism among the British, and by proxy, all anglophone people. Which is why they find refuge without issue in anglosphere nations. William the bastard brought them over in the first place. William of orange handed them full control of English society.
It's multifaceted, but you can find something resembling dispensationalism in any country in the anglosphere because all of these beliefs are descended from a common ancestor.
Dutch protestantism suffered a similar fate to english protestantism by the way. The Dutch are largely to blame for what happened in the anglosphere themselves (because of William of orange)
9 months ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
>puritan theology
Aka Neo-Judaization. Puritanism is an attempt to remove all "Pagan" influence (which they falsely claimed the Catholic Church was the result of) on Christianity, without realizing that they have mistaken the teaching of the Church Fathers for Paganism, and therefore have become tools for the Synagogue of Satan. Modern "Judaism" is itself a Pagan creed, but the Puritans were too blinded by their own hatred of the Catholic Church established by Christ Himself to realize they had thrown in their lot with the very people He had warned us to have no association with.
Because 99% of people are useless period, it only takes a small but dedicated group of people to enact sweeping change. Give me five men willing to be Martyrs for a cause over a million sheep who wont fight even for their own lives any day.
9 months ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
No, dispensationalism is far more specific than just vaguely thinking that Jews can be saved. Dispensationalism is set of beliefs that the Bible is to be divided into "dispensations" and that we're currently in the "church age" and then there's going to be a rapture at any minute, and then some remaining non-raptured Jews will miraculously be saved, and so forth. It also takes prophecies from around the Babylonian captivity of the Israelites and erroneously claims that not all of those have been fulfilled (hence why modern false-Israel must exist). This all started in the mid 1800s by John Nelson Darby, and it languished in total obscurity for a while until it was popularized in America by Cyrus Scofield and his shady Zionist financiers in the early 1900s, and then really gained traction after WWII when Zionist-funded book publishers began literally giving Scofield study bibles away for free. The overwhelming majority of Protestants had historically believed that born-again saved Christians were God's chosen people, and all this nonsense about dispensations and unfulfilled prophecies was nowhere to be found. The whole point of Protestantism was Biblical purity, not philosemitism.
I am 1000% aware of how dispensationalism started, the pseudo theology behind it, the Schofield Bible, everything you mentioned already.
But the philosemitism did not start with the Schofield Bible, that just fed it steroids. Dispensationalism didnt either, schofield just made it mainstream. It started with John Nelson Darby, a 19th century *british* priest. And I know the protestantism didn't start as a pro jewish current (luther hated jews more than possibly any other Christian leader there was). But the anglosphere was primed to become philosemitic because of the erroneous puritan belief that the jews would convert out of the goodness of their hearts.
Darby's teachings were the main influence for the Schofield Bible. Which spread throughout every other English speaking country by proxy.
America and every other country founded by white British colonists, as well as the motherland, were doomed to fall under jewish dominion because they were not aware enough. Or aware at all, really. The collective British people spent centuries having hardly any interaction with jews whatsoever, even when jews were permitted to live there for roughly 200 years after William the bastard. And we dont know what influence they had in norman/plantagenet leadership, but if it was notable i would not surprised. Most of them were elitist dickheads that should have been strung up. But I digress, the jews made little foray into English public life regardless.
The jews became a sort of mystical people that the British had no experience with and were not prepared to deal with properly. Notice how theres virtually no jewish type villain characters in british folklore unless its a borrowing from much later german folklore, as a for instance. The puritans opened the floodgates not even out of malice, but ignorance. The anglosphere has paid the consequences of this since then.
The Dutch though? Yeah I don't have an excuse for their acceptance of jews. I guess the short term huge financial gain of jewish dominated markets was enough to make them stop noticing.
Eventually this devolved into dispensationalism and the belief that jews are "gods chosen people" because they say so. But the seeds were sown in England. Though, it goes back long before cromwell and was completed after his reign. Jews were first brought to England by William the bastard. They were given control over the banks by William of orange some 600 years later.
But cromwell's ignorance about jews led to philosemitism among the British, and by proxy, all anglophone people. Which is why they find refuge without issue in anglosphere nations. William the bastard brought them over in the first place. William of orange handed them full control of English society.
It's multifaceted, but you can find something resembling dispensationalism in any country in the anglosphere because all of these beliefs are descended from a common ancestor.
Dutch protestantism suffered a similar fate to english protestantism by the way. The Dutch are largely to blame for what happened in the anglosphere themselves (because of William of orange)
Aka Neo-Judaization. Puritanism is an attempt to remove all "Pagan" influence (which they falsely claimed the Catholic Church was the result of) on Christianity, without realizing that they have mistaken the teaching of the Church Fathers for Paganism, and therefore have become tools for the Synagogue of Satan. Modern "Judaism" is itself a Pagan creed, but the Puritans were too blinded by their own hatred of the Catholic Church established by Christ Himself to realize they had thrown in their lot with the very people He had warned us to have no association with.
Christianity is a tool wielded by jews. Even if a tiny percentage refuse the jewish parts, they are vastly outnumbered.
But the philosemitism did not start with the Schofield Bible, that just fed it steroids. Dispensationalism didnt either, schofield just made it mainstream. It started with John Nelson Darby, a 19th century *british* priest. And I know the protestantism didn't start as a pro jewish current (luther hated jews more than possibly any other Christian leader there was). But the anglosphere was primed to become philosemitic because of the erroneous puritan belief that the jews would convert out of the goodness of their hearts.
Darby's teachings were the main influence for the Schofield Bible. Which spread throughout every other English speaking country by proxy.
America and every other country founded by white British colonists, as well as the motherland, were doomed to fall under jewish dominion because they were not aware enough. Or aware at all, really. The collective British people spent centuries having hardly any interaction with jews whatsoever, even when jews were permitted to live there for roughly 200 years after William the bastard. And we dont know what influence they had in norman/plantagenet leadership, but if it was notable i would not surprised. Most of them were elitist dickheads that should have been strung up. But I digress, the jews made little foray into English public life regardless.
The jews became a sort of mystical people that the British had no experience with and were not prepared to deal with properly. Notice how theres virtually no jewish type villain characters in british folklore unless its a borrowing from much later german folklore, as a for instance. The puritans opened the floodgates not even out of malice, but ignorance. The anglosphere has paid the consequences of this since then.
The Dutch though? Yeah I don't have an excuse for their acceptance of jews. I guess the short term huge financial gain of jewish dominated markets was enough to make them stop noticing.