New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
22
posted 9 months ago by linden687 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +22Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
multiformat on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
No, dispensationalism is far more specific than just vaguely thinking that Jews can be saved. Dispensationalism is set of beliefs that the Bible is to be divided into "dispensations" and that we're currently in the "church age" and then there's going to be a rapture at any minute, and then some remaining non-raptured Jews will miraculously be saved, and so forth. It also takes prophecies from around the Babylonian captivity of the Israelites and erroneously claims that not all of those have been fulfilled (hence why modern false-Israel must exist). This all started in the mid 1800s by John Nelson Darby, and it languished in total obscurity for a while until it was popularized in America by Cyrus Scofield and his shady Zionist financiers in the early 1900s, and then really gained traction after WWII when Zionist-funded book publishers began literally giving Scofield study bibles away for free. The overwhelming majority of Protestants had historically believed that born-again saved Christians were God's chosen people, and all this nonsense about dispensations and unfulfilled prophecies was nowhere to be found. The whole point of Protestantism was Biblical purity, not philosemitism.
devotech2 on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
I am 1000% aware of how dispensationalism started, the pseudo theology behind it, the Schofield Bible, everything you mentioned already.

But the philosemitism did not start with the Schofield Bible, that just fed it steroids. Dispensationalism didnt either, schofield just made it mainstream. It started with John Nelson Darby, a 19th century *british* priest. And I know the protestantism didn't start as a pro jewish current (luther hated jews more than possibly any other Christian leader there was). But the anglosphere was primed to become philosemitic because of the erroneous puritan belief that the jews would convert out of the goodness of their hearts.

Darby's teachings were the main influence for the Schofield Bible. Which spread throughout every other English speaking country by proxy.

America and every other country founded by white British colonists, as well as the motherland, were doomed to fall under jewish dominion because they were not aware enough. Or aware at all, really. The collective British people spent centuries having hardly any interaction with jews whatsoever, even when jews were permitted to live there for roughly 200 years after William the bastard. And we dont know what influence they had in norman/plantagenet leadership, but if it was notable i would not surprised. Most of them were elitist dickheads that should have been strung up. But I digress, the jews made little foray into English public life regardless.

The jews became a sort of mystical people that the British had no experience with and were not prepared to deal with properly. Notice how theres virtually no jewish type villain characters in british folklore unless its a borrowing from much later german folklore, as a for instance. The puritans opened the floodgates not even out of malice, but ignorance. The anglosphere has paid the consequences of this since then.

The Dutch though? Yeah I don't have an excuse for their acceptance of jews. I guess the short term huge financial gain of jewish dominated markets was enough to make them stop noticing.
Toast message