Consume Product

> If you still think the Catholic Church is Christianity you are completely lost and will be as manipulated as Poland will be.

No, the post-Vatican II Church is not really the Catholic Church anymore, that's the problem. It doesn't teach the Catholic faith anymore, at least in large parts.

Luther was the one who first chose the Judaist canon over the Church-defined one, he was the first Judaizer so to speak - not to mention the judaized Scofield Bible, the root of Protestant dispensationalism and "rapture" theology.

Catholic states like Spain kicked the Jews out many times. The Jews very well knew this and they were displeased - so they infiltrated the hierarchy from the inside, through the seminaries, from the 1700s onward. [There's a good writeup here of how they did it](https://dubia.cc/en/who-we-are).

There are still Catholics who will speak out against the Jews, but obviously, since the mainstream Church was taken over, they are persecuted.

> Babylon the Great is in big part the Catholic Church that sits on the cit of 7 hills (Rome),

That reference likely refers to Pagan Rome, not Catholic Rome.

> You put men between you God and the WORD.

No, that's a Lutheran invention.

It is very obvious that you need people to interpret scripture if a group of people are supposed to agree on anything. Before 1054, there was only the Catholic Church, there was no "Southern Baptist McPastor" who interpreted the Bible how he liked it (also, there was no Bible, the Bible came from the Catholic Church).

Lutherans disagree with Calvinists, who disagree with Anglicans, who disagree with Baptists, etc. "Sola scriptura" is a retarded concept because you can contradict Christ with the gospel if you really wanted to. It's obvious that there has to be an authoritative magisterium that interprets scripture, defines what even belongs to the Bible and what doesn't, etc. Luther just ursuped that authority and made himself the authority. Every single Protestant Church teaches something else and they are only united in "we are not Catholics".

Also, the "WORD" doesn't refer to the written scripture (which didn't even exist for the first 300 years and most people couldn't read), it refers to the LOGOS, Jesus himself, the Word become flesh, i.e. the Eucharist. To say that Catholics put men between the Logos and them is retarded. At every (valid) Mass we eat the real body, blood and divinity of Christ, according to John 6 ("this IS my body"). So those men bring us closer to God, they don't stand between us and God. Similar thing for confession: it's a useless act without repentance first. Etc.

To say that the priests block us from our connection with God is completely retarded. I say this as a former Protestant. The CC is merely a continuation of the OT, but with the perfect sacrifice (which is Jesus in the Eucharist, according to John 6).

> The entire reason Jesus died was so that you didn't need that middle men which went bad throughout history and lost the right to lead.

No, it was to even make it possible to atone for the original sin of Adam. He never said there will never be bad people in the Church or that everyone should interpret scripture in his bedroom however he / she likes. Sola scriptura is nowhere in the bible (neither is sola fide).

He even instituted a "middle man" called Peter in Matthew 16:18. The apostles, did they not exist or what? Jesus very well wanted us to confess our sins to men (Matthew 16:19, Matthew 18:18), those sentences would have no sense otherwise.

Now you could say that the pope lost his office because of his heresy (sedevacantism). Well, I just say he lost the authority, as the job description of the papacy is to "safeguard and keep Tradition". Right now the current pope is writing up a new Mass for climate change, which is absolutely nowhere in Tradition. So, we just don't follow him for now, but it doesn't invalidate all Catholic teaching.

> Example is that article. Everything in that article is a lie and the Jewish religion didn't even exist at the time of Christ.

Not everything in the article is a lie and yes, the Jewish (i.e. Torah) religion very well existed at the time of Christ, not sure where you got your history from. Jesus even taught in the temple to the rabbis, he knew Jewish law very well.

The article is wrong to merely see modern kabbalistic Judaism as "less perfect Judaism". The Jews killed Christ and then turned into the worst persecutors of Catholics, i.e. Anti-Christians. Jews were cursed and the Catholic Church is the only true continuation of the Old Testament Religion, but with the new, perfect sacrifice, which is Christ himself.

The article you posted is correct in that the Catholic Church is the continuation of the Law of Moses. "I came to fulfil the law, not to change it", said Jesus. Open any confession manual, it's just the 10 commandments, that's it. Jesus never abrogated or changed the 10 commandments. And we still need to keep the 10 commandments, they are not abrogated (Phillipians 2:12).

You should know that Trent Horn, the person who runs Catholic Answers is a Jew. So, he's a Judaist infiltrator speaking on behalf of Catholicism. He represents modernist, judaized Catholicism, which is NOT traditional Catholicism. The Jews tried many times over the centuries to infiltrate the Church, in the 1960s they sadly succeeded. Still, they failed to extinguish Catholicism entirely.

In other words, you are attacking "Catholicism" by reading what a Jewish "Catholic" writes about Catholicism. The current hierarchy is infiltrated by Jews, modernists, freemasons and communists. It doesn't invalidate Catholicism, it just makes it harder to find the truth.

> and that spiritual Israel is what matters (and is what the bless Israel scripture now refers to)

Half correct. There is no "spiritual Israel". The Catholic Church (the mystical body of its members, not the hierarchy per se) is the new Israel, after the Jews killed their king. Everyone who holds the Catholic Faith is part of that "Israel".

> Jesus said he is high priest, king and you are all brothers.

Correct. The pope is merely the vicar (= vice president) of the Church. Doesn't mean that there are no priests or bishops anymore (ex. 1 Timothy 5:22 clearly shows the institution of a bishop).