You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
7
multiformat on scored.co
10 months ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)2 children
I'm not demanding anything. You said the entire story was nothing and that absolutely nothing happened, ignoring the 2 arrests and what's already been proven about how Epstein and his wife are pedo human traffickers with elite clients like Prince Andrew, et al. Now you're moving the goalposts saying that because the FBI didn't turn up a list, then we just take the FBI's word for it because they have such a great record and aren't corrupt at all.
10 months ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
>Now you're moving the goalposts
You mean like me explaining everything Epstein and Maxwell were arraigned on, and now you don't want to talk about it? Like that??
>then we just take the FBI's word for it because they have such a great record and aren't corrupt at all.
You took their word for it on the cameras not working, didn't you? You took their word on the report saying that the nigger guards were sleeping on the job, didn't you? You took their word for it on the entire Maxwell/Epstein search, arrest, evidence collected, and arraignment, didn't you?
You believe the FBI when they say things you like to hear. You don't believe them if anything says something you don't. What's really astonishing about this mindset is that *you yourself are a nobody who knows nothing*. You just think you 'know' things even though you have no way of actually *knowing* anything, because it's not like you personally have ever investigated fuck-all yourself.
You read internet memes and actually believe they're real for no reason except you wish them to be real. And that's just goddamn pathetic.
It's genuinely beyond your capability to process that maybe you have ever once been wrong about anything. This is entirely an ego thing for you, and I've long maintained that conspiracy theory is mostly attractive to absolute fuckwits because it lets them feel like they're super-intelligent Jason Bournes 'outsmarting' everybody. Makes them feel smart to distract from the fact that they're dumb.
10 months ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)1 child
> You took their word for it on the cameras not working, didn't you?
No?
>You took their word for it on the entire Maxwell/Epstein search, arrest, evidence collected, and arraignment, didn't you?
Epstein was originally investigated and arrested by Florida Police. Much later, the FBI got involved, and then not long after Epstein was conveniently dead, and now there's claims that there's nothing more to the story.
>Epstein List was literally invented by 4chan
Epstein himself said he had dirt on people that could destroy their lives. There's also evidence that he rigged his home with cameras to record people. That's an implied list. Here, you fucking Mossad kike:
Which means it's "conjecture" which is literally the first thing I fucking said. And it's conjecture it even involved child porn in the first place. He was a socialite and knew tons of people. It literally could just be him memorizing and knowing lurid details of people's normal scandalous behaviors - "Remember that time you did a line of coke off that stripper's ass? Sure would be devastating to your mayoral campaign..."
Like you literally think that list of phone contacts was "the list". There's hundreds of names, practically everyone who is anyone is in there.
I know you're a fucking lunatic so it probably doesn't make sense to you, but sexual attraction to children isn't *so* prevalent that "magically" every single person (literally 100% of them, as you seem to think) who has any influence or power also is in to that shit.
Why is it that Randy Andy was the *only* one these victims mentioned?
---
Oh remember how you said "why weren't the victims sued for naming names"? Virginia Guillifre was sued by Dershowitz, lost, and then admitted she made it up. So basically what you stated didn't happen, actually happened.
>The list is implied by Epstein himself for fuck's sake.
According to the jew York Times and one single openly gay reporter who claims he spent money and time to go out of his way for a story, yet he "magically" sat on it for an entire year for no reason, until mere days after Epstein's death when he published it, just in time for nobody to be alive to refute that such an interview ever even happened?
Aren't conspiracy theorists supposed to be super-ultra-megaminds who notice strange coincidences like that?
Have you never in your life ever once considered that shit like "the Epstein list" is intentionally seeded into retarded right-wingers to drive them insane? Kind of like what was experimented with in MKULTRA and Operation Mockingbird?
10 months ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
>Oh remember how you said "why weren't the victims sued for naming names"? Virginia Guillifre was sued by Dershowitz, lost, and then admitted she made it up. So basically what you stated didn't happen, actually happened. I expect you to ignore that though.
Virginia Guillifre committed suicide not long after. Nothing suspicious about that at all, sure.
Also, if you don't trust the FBI, and certainly the FBI knows that the 'Epstein client list' is pop-culture "knowledge" now, why wouldn't the FBI fabricate a fake list (which you would believe) to incriminate their enemies?
Every goddamn position you have just invites more questions that have no more answers and it all started off with me asking a simple question:
"Do you accept that there is a possibility - no matter how remote - that there may actually never have been a 'list' and 'blackmail'?"
As in, maybe the kids were for him and for close friends, whose trust he had no intention of betraying since they'd all go down together?
Do you think there's even a fraction of a percent chance that that's actually possible?
You mean like me explaining everything Epstein and Maxwell were arraigned on, and now you don't want to talk about it? Like that??
>then we just take the FBI's word for it because they have such a great record and aren't corrupt at all.
You took their word for it on the cameras not working, didn't you? You took their word on the report saying that the nigger guards were sleeping on the job, didn't you? You took their word for it on the entire Maxwell/Epstein search, arrest, evidence collected, and arraignment, didn't you?
You believe the FBI when they say things you like to hear. You don't believe them if anything says something you don't. What's really astonishing about this mindset is that *you yourself are a nobody who knows nothing*. You just think you 'know' things even though you have no way of actually *knowing* anything, because it's not like you personally have ever investigated fuck-all yourself.
You read internet memes and actually believe they're real for no reason except you wish them to be real. And that's just goddamn pathetic.
It's genuinely beyond your capability to process that maybe you have ever once been wrong about anything. This is entirely an ego thing for you, and I've long maintained that conspiracy theory is mostly attractive to absolute fuckwits because it lets them feel like they're super-intelligent Jason Bournes 'outsmarting' everybody. Makes them feel smart to distract from the fact that they're dumb.
No?
>You took their word for it on the entire Maxwell/Epstein search, arrest, evidence collected, and arraignment, didn't you?
Epstein was originally investigated and arrested by Florida Police. Much later, the FBI got involved, and then not long after Epstein was conveniently dead, and now there's claims that there's nothing more to the story.
>Epstein List was literally invented by 4chan
Epstein himself said he had dirt on people that could destroy their lives. There's also evidence that he rigged his home with cameras to record people. That's an implied list. Here, you fucking Mossad kike:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/12/business/jeffrey-epstein-interview.html
https://www.ibtimes.com.au/prince-andrew-might-have-been-caught-tape-sex-slave-1407641
Which means it's "conjecture" which is literally the first thing I fucking said. And it's conjecture it even involved child porn in the first place. He was a socialite and knew tons of people. It literally could just be him memorizing and knowing lurid details of people's normal scandalous behaviors - "Remember that time you did a line of coke off that stripper's ass? Sure would be devastating to your mayoral campaign..."
Like you literally think that list of phone contacts was "the list". There's hundreds of names, practically everyone who is anyone is in there.
I know you're a fucking lunatic so it probably doesn't make sense to you, but sexual attraction to children isn't *so* prevalent that "magically" every single person (literally 100% of them, as you seem to think) who has any influence or power also is in to that shit.
Why is it that Randy Andy was the *only* one these victims mentioned?
---
Oh remember how you said "why weren't the victims sued for naming names"? Virginia Guillifre was sued by Dershowitz, lost, and then admitted she made it up. So basically what you stated didn't happen, actually happened.
I expect you to ignore that though.
You said the entire thing was hallucinated by 4chan and there was absolutely nothing to it.
According to the jew York Times and one single openly gay reporter who claims he spent money and time to go out of his way for a story, yet he "magically" sat on it for an entire year for no reason, until mere days after Epstein's death when he published it, just in time for nobody to be alive to refute that such an interview ever even happened?
Aren't conspiracy theorists supposed to be super-ultra-megaminds who notice strange coincidences like that?
Have you never in your life ever once considered that shit like "the Epstein list" is intentionally seeded into retarded right-wingers to drive them insane? Kind of like what was experimented with in MKULTRA and Operation Mockingbird?
Virginia Guillifre committed suicide not long after. Nothing suspicious about that at all, sure.
You don't think it's really weird that all these victims out there seem to allergic to naming names themselves, besides Prince Andrew?
Every goddamn position you have just invites more questions that have no more answers and it all started off with me asking a simple question:
"Do you accept that there is a possibility - no matter how remote - that there may actually never have been a 'list' and 'blackmail'?"
As in, maybe the kids were for him and for close friends, whose trust he had no intention of betraying since they'd all go down together?
Do you think there's even a fraction of a percent chance that that's actually possible?